all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 11 months ago

I was going to make a snarky comment about this obviously being true due to different infrastructure priorities in the EU vs the US. The article is right, though, about the deficiencies in US auto standards and their likely impact if applied to Europe.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    What "US standards"? They don't fucking HAVE standards.

    FUCK US STANDARDS. Who gives a shit about that failed fucking country?! We do our own thing, thank you, don't come back.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    "Risk" You mean waste, kill, demolish, guarantee the loss of, wreck, harm, fuck over.

    The US has seen incredible increases in physical harm to people from these monstrosities. They've been seeing damage to cities as roads are widened. Families consistently lose family memories or have someone harmed by injuries due to oversized vanity vehicles being significantly more dangerous to everyone around them.

    Add in the increased pollution, road wear, plastics in the air from tires, new waves of loan debt to finance that shit, and the noise pollution that's just starting to be researched (the results to date demonstrate massive issues for communities from the noise alone). Allowing these shit box machines into the EU would be horrible for the continent.

    Source: yes, I do pay attention to the research. Yes, I do work with advocacy groups to improve city infrastructure and reduce car dependency. Yes, I did live in the US for 45 years. Yes, I did have family and friends lost to these oversized vehicles. Yes, I moved out of the US, partially to escape the road-car-truck-storad shithole my cities became ot accommodate cars over people. Don't let it happen here, EU.

    In the words of the Australian Transportation Secretary: "when deciding what to do, look at the Americans and don't do that".

  • source
  • 16 comments in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 35 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    how about they just learn how to build cars properly ffs.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Not much chance

    President Trump is set to announce a rollback of fuel economy standards that were tightened under the Biden administration, aiming to reduce vehicle costs and increase consumer choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    "Reducing vehicle costs" lmao?

    Cars this big are WAY more expensive, especially on fuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    how about Europeans just learn that corporate profits are more important that a few peasant lives ffs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    Keep those SPCV’s (small-penis-compensation vehicles) off our roads! https://youtu.be/--832LV9a3I

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    All those big, hated parking companies should really lobby against this. They'll have to rebuild most of the parking houses and repaint/mark all the parking lots to make room for these monstrosities. That would cost them quite a lot and result in fewer spaces. 🫣

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    They wouldn't, it would be self regulating. If you can't park (for example in an underground garage) you can't shop at your fav store. Usually the only other viable parking in the big cities is blocks aways. People would catch on quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Hard to imagine Europeans will buy these tanks at $7.50 a gallon for gas, narrow roads and very tight parking spaces, even for subcompacts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Let's not do that.

  • source