1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 11 months ago

The best moment was when Denise tells him about a better app. NJ publishes its routes as open data, so you aren't limited to the "official" app.

  • source
  • 14 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 11 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    I always find it interesting how Americans name public transport as "the" bus. As in singular.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Is this uncommon?
    Expression is the same in German, even in the places with really good public transport: "Sollen wir den Bus nehmen?" - "Should we take the bus?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, I imagine it's the same most places. You aren't taking all the busses. You're only taking the one. Multiple may exist, but they aren't the one you're on.

    It's the same for cars, trains, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    At least where I am from, yes. Maybe very specific, but I always notice it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    How do you phrase it? Is it "take a bus/buses"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Where I live we usually just say the station name. And because you have multiple fast lines to get to said station, it doesn't make sense to say, I take the bus, or I take the underground, or I take the train. Because all of them take you there. It's mostly about preference.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    It's because if you say you take the bus it implies that you only need one and have no transfers. If somebody needs to go two cardinal directions to get to their destination they need two buses, ie they are lost to the American public transportation system and won't be seen until archeologists find their remains.

    The hubris of those who wish to travel 7 kilometers or more using public transit in the States is punished. Those who wish to travel 5 miles swiftly learn that feat is only attainable in a a minimum of 4 hours or alternatively you can walk or bike and get run over at a crosswalk by a pickup with more blindspots than a Abrams tank.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Wait what, the US has distance based transit pricing?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    For some systems. The NYC subway and buses you pay once to get on and you can go as far as you want. NJ Transit right over the river you buy a ticket specific for your start and end, and it costs more if you go farther.

    (I didn't watch the video because I'm supposed to be working and I don't like video as a format, but hopefully this is what you meant)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    The San Francisco systems have at least some of that. You're supposed to use a card to get in and out of the trains and you're charged by distance.

    Most systems don't really have such a thing, though many have one way or time-based tickets (like 2 hours).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I did not watch the video but suburbs accessibility is a global issue that needs real politic implication (I mean money) to be solved.

    Here, 15km from a medium euro city, an express and affordable bus line arrived only last year thanks to a global metropolitan project. Before that there was only an overpriced line that was pretty far from many districts, it was faster and more convenient to go by bike, that's how I realised 15km is 20 min by car (without congestion), 40 by bike, 3h by feet, and random by bus.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I would say "take the bus", in the same way I'd say I'm taking the car, or the bike.

  • source