all 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Tyres specifically break down on hard surfaces that typically drain directly to a nearby waterway. Used tyres were/are popular for boat fenders and seawalls and the like. That and literally just dumping them. I’m not surprised.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 11 months ago* (43 children)

    In waters is consistently about a third from tires and a third from synthetic textiles (bcs washing).

    Eg

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Of course the 2% contributor has been addressed, personal care products now aren't allowed to have plastic "abrasives", which is a good change anyway as plastic is useless for improving scrubbing

    No other sources have had any work done to mitigate the problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    I'd like to see the numbers, but I imagine that the synthetic textiles chunk comes from the sheer volume of fast-fashion and trashion produced every year. I have synthetic shirts that are well over a decade old and still look and function as brand new. My cotton shirts under similar wear get ratty and frayed in that time frame (and require harsh chemicals for stains).

    If we stopped over-washing and over production, I wouldn't be surprised if the lifetime ecological footprint of synthetic garments is less than a cotton equivalent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    i would imagine most comes from shedding of the fabrics in regular use and washing+drying, basically the rate is mostly constant fast fashion or not. I would think the only viable solution would be limiting/stopping or finding alternatives to synthetic fibers. Also perhaps some kind of microplastic filter in washing machine outlets mandated by regulation could be a way to limit the emissions of new microplastics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So... Cotton/Linen/Wool? The technology is fine, its only downside in most applications is simply cost. Cotton clothes are more comfortable, less stinky, less polluting, and won't fuse with your skin and disfigure you for life if they accidentally catch on fire. On top of not making microplastics soup every wash cycle.

    If we cared to actually solve the problem of plastics in fast fashion we could ban them, with some exceptions for sportswear and shoes where synthetics have some actually useful uses. Hell, we could even make it an easy transition by gradually pulling back the allowable synthetic content for x years.

    But it would directly kneecap Shein and H&M's business model so we have to weigh all the pros against that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    I'm sure would find equivalent non-polluting alternative materials within a couple of years if we banned all plastics ("synthetic textiles").
    But only if we actually put the ban in place.
    Otherwise the answer is never.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Cotton/Linen/Wool

    There's also Hemp. And Lyocell, which is made from cellulose (Sourced from trees or bamboo).

    And yeah nice fully cotton clothes can be pricey. The upside is that they're generally much higher quality and very comfy. Annoyingly it is very common for stuff to be labeled "100% cotton" yet still be cotton/poly mix so always check the fabric breakdown on tags or website fine print.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes, this is how I understand it too, it's not like half of your shirt ends up in the ocean (and the amount of plastics that ends up in the landfills isn't really included in the microplastics that circle around - that's a problem for the future - so the vomit-inducing fast fashion/consumerism is a bigger problem from every other standpoint).

    And yes again on the only viable solution - it's stupid to try to slightly improve something you are gonna be producing more of every year. The "improvements" are just propaganda we are (successfully) fed for decades & it just muddies the discussions whilst keeping the current/same profiteers in power (without even changing the business model).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Last year I looked for a filter for my washer, and found a lot of inconsistencies and hocus pocus.

    This year it’s really hitting me how ratty my cotton t-shirts from pandemic look, especially compared to the rayon blend t-shirts from the same time. If the cotton is heavier and bulkier, doesn’t last as long, needs tons of water…. Is it really better?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    My decade old plastic shirts have faded, the linen ones last better, but yeah, they stain (and I'm not going to test them with plastic coatings to improve stain resistance!). I only get bold colours, so my pastel shirts are very faded

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (27 children)

    You don't have a good idea to replace synthetics in textiles, do you? I can't stand cotton shirts, but I would really like to skip synthetics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    If you live somewhere cold – wool.

    If you live somewhere hot – linen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    I think I have to give linen a second chance. Or maybe modal/lycocell/etc. Germany isn't sub Saharan warm, but I'm built like an oven 😐

    Edit: oh, this is why I gave up on them. I'm not paying 85€ for a single shirt 🫩

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Keep an eye out at thrift shops, maybe? I assume those exist near you. Probably much less availability that way, so you might have to look for a while, and fewer pattern options as a result, but cheaper and for a test maybe better because already pre-softened through wash and wear?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    If we banned plastics (gutting their lobbies affecting everything from taxes, laws/regulation, logistics, etc) we would have natural replacements in like 5 years & nobody would even think of the times before (except for environmental cleanup purposes).

    They said you can't have water-tight bags from non-fossil fuel sauces, now they are everywhere. The paper industry just like developed see-through water-tight "paper" (the lil windows in envelopes & some packaging) bcs they didn't want to deal with the petrol industry.

    The non-plastic drinking straws? Yeah, explain to me why they intentionally sux even tho we always had the materials for a seamless transition?

    (Also, just in case an fyi - cotton, like wool, can be processed and woven if very much different ways which makes for basically divergent materials, it's a whole science. The mainstream stuff is mostly the same tho.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The fact that some paper straws perform as well as plastic suggests that the bad ones are just cheaper and are used by companies that don't care. When I used to drink the sort of drinks that use straws I carried a steel straw to use in places that didn't supply good straws

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, logistics are hard & I imagine a small bar/café doesn't have the (kind of?) staff to think about straws or where else to search for the ones that don't fill costumes with nasty shit - they just pick whatever their usual supplier has on offer so it's less paperwork.

    And it's not like anyone blamed them for shitty straws anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Have you tried Rayon? It's a semi synthetic fabric made from cellulose and iirc biodegradades decently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    This is a really good point. Most of my synthetics clothes have been made of a rayon blend, so maybe they were not so bad after all.

    This would be an excellent point to clarify.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    People wore animal and plant based clothing for hundreds of thousands of years

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    And I can't stand how it feels. Cotton feels sweaty all the time and wool is just too warm. I'm starting to wear sweaters when temperatures hit single digits (Celsius) and jackets when below zero. I'm not made for warm and friendly. I need breathable. Cotton sucks here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Get yourself a merino wool base layer shirt, like a thin one not sweater thick. It'll be surprisingly cool.

    Try hemp or bamboo fibre (has different names like rayon, tencel, lyocell).

    You could try different thicknesses of cotton and see how it feels. Or cotton blended with the other materials. Some companies list their shirts as lightweight or heavyweight or give cloth weight in gsm (grams per square meter) or oz (ounces per square yard). A lightweight and oversized shirt will be good in the heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    I live in Australia and I wear 100% cotton very regularly, including summer. It was 39° today and I've been wearing a cotton shirt all day.

    It certainly does not feel sweaty all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Good thing how you perceive the world is how everyone perceives it. Thanks for helping me understand I don't know how I feel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    You're totally right, your perception is valid and should be fair to share, and mine should not. Put another way - where did I say your feelings are wrong, or that my perspective is universal.

    I hate seeing natural clothing fibres being slandered, especially under an article talking about how we're choking the planet with microplastics.. Seems like a good time to point out I have the opposite experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    some people are allergic to cotton, because of lanolin produced by sheep that is aprt of the wool, people are allergic to it. polyester also can cause rashes in some people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 17 points 11 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Using Tardises (is that the correct plural) wouldn't just cause a mess in space but also in time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I think the plural is tardii? Unclear, may need to rewatch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I don't think Gallifreyan has a Latin root

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    But Latin may have a Gallifreyan root?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Genuine question: is this canon?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    tssssssss like the sound of a perforated tire

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Mmm, yes, destroy people's tires so they have to buy new ones (at least a pair with 2WD cars, or an entire set if you destroy just one tire on a proper AWD/4WD car). Surely more tires being dumped in landfills and more new tires being manufactured is good for the planet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago

    I wonder as well how much comes to play from tires dumped in the ocean like the Osborne reefs as they’re degradation over time.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    🚅🚃🚃🚃

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yet this ass-backwards emoji exists: 🚳.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    I mean, it's just a road sign not some kind of anti-bike statement. There's no equivalent anti-car emoji because places where cars aren't allowed usually are impossible to access in one so no signage is needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    🌈 Yet another problem EVs don't address 🌈

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    That actually surprises me. I was to understand that abandoned fishing net was the major issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Tires are made of rubber, not plastic. U can't fool me, science.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You had me for a second there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    From the wikipedia page: "Styrene-butadiene or styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) describe families of synthetic rubbers derived from styrene and butadiene..... About 50% of car tires are made from various types of SBR." Styrene should sound familiar is the base of polystyrene used to make styrofoam

  • source
  • parent