It's just a primary guys. Let's hope he wins the seat.
post
Apparently, Faux News calls him "Zohran the Destroyer". This is exactly the sort of name that I want with progressive leadership. 🤩
The number of opinion pieces having meltdowns over Mamdani is simply off the charts. The fascists and neolibs are losing their minds about this. It’s incredible.
Mamdani isn’t even remotely radical as far as leftists go. What’s he’s proposing is just the bare minimum of common sense as far as the rest of the world is concerned.
They're acting like Luigi broke out and started making the world a better place one capitalist at a time again.
allegedly
Right? I don’t get this at all. The guy gets elected, offers a couple things via social policy change, and everyone loses their shit. Even the title of the article this is about calls it “socialism” when it’s a far cry from it.
Social Democracy is not the same as Socialism. But, I wasn’t following the race, maybe he does want the public to own the means of production.
I get the hesitation since in US politics they often get conflated and I can’t say I’ve followed him very closely but someone else shared this. I know he’s also advocating for city owned grocery stores.

so he is a socialist?
The word gets used so often as a pejorative it's weird to see it used accurately by that crowd.
Quite a lot of red states have state owned liquor stores,[0] so city owned grocery stores doesn't sound that radical. Apparently, Atlanta is doing it.[1] I hadn't heard of this idea before, but web search shows it is a thing. I'd consider it socialism if he also wants to close down the privately run grocery stores. He doesn't seem to be doing that
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoholic_beverage_control_state
Apparently, Atlanta is doing it.[1]
I'm an Atlantan and this is the first I'm hearing of it. Neat!
Reading the article, though, it's really just that the city is subsidizing a private business (and in one of the two cases, acting as its landlord) in order to create an incentive to open in a food desert, not actually getting into the business of operating a grocery store directly itself.
I mean, I got a loan from Invest Atlanta to help with the down payment on my house, but that doesn't mean the city owns my house or that it's some kind of 'government housing.'
I mean, I got a loan from Invest Atlanta to help with the down payment on my house, but that doesn't mean the city owns my house or that it's some kind of 'government housing.'
That really depends on who you ask these days doesn't it.
Well, they sent me a letter a few years back saying the loan had been forgiven since I'd owner-occupied the home for a decade, so now the only other entity that might claim to own it is the creditor for my regular first mortgage. And the state (in the sense that my title is 'fee simple' and not 'allodial' so I'm still subject to things like taxes and eminent domain), I guess.
That's a fair criticism. Usually with public-private partnerships there's requirements they have to meet though. I'm curious what those are planned to look like. It could be something as lax as "continue operating at this location" or it could be "prices cannot exceed this value, and employees must have these things, etc."
It could be a good start to actual state operated grocery stores, but starting from scratch and setting up the logistics is an insane barrier, and it's also part of the issue. It's too hard to compete with existing companies, so they can do whatever they want and no one else can reasonably enter the market to compete with them.
I see. Question then is whether the store operator gets to set the prices. Donald Trump of course lives in government housing right now, so that's ok too.
The government running public alternatives isn't socialism. Socialism is specifically about control of the means of production. The only people who think socialism is when the government does stuff are Bernie bros who think Sweden is socialist and MAGA who also think Sweden is socialist. Basically, if someone think that Sweden is socialist then they have no idea what they're talking about.
I'm OK with it because maybe when they realize he's just a guy making decisions to help his community, it will remove a smidge of the ZOMG SOCIALISM reaction to folks like not only him, but also Bernie, and maybe others who might like to call themselves social democrats instead of democrats.
If Bernie and AOC start the social democrat party tomorrow with Mamdani and others, I'm registering before the ink is dry.
Also Democratic Socialism (Mamdani's beliefs) are not the same as Social Democracy. They are slightly different.
That kind of depends. Bernie claims to be a Democratic Socialist, but Europeans have said that his stated beliefs align more with Social Democracy. This may be another case of us Americans having a different definition than the rest of the world (like with liberal).
also the red underlined section of this post: https://lemmy.ml/post/32229216
Everyone's talking like he's won the mayorship already.
He hasn’t technically but don’t stop the vibes. Fuck it, Mamdani FTW bitches!!!!! Woot woot! LFG for round two! For the people!
Agreed. Lets wait and see
What has made me hopeful and excited though, is that the Democratic voters are going against the DNC.
"Socialism" lol
It is a win though, it shows people are willing to vote for change through alternative parties and thats fucking huge
He's a Democrat, not 3rd party.
Shit I will amend that. Forgot he won the democratic primary. He is still heavily associated with DSA though and this is well known.
Because he had to run in the democratic primary in order to have a shot. He’s a member of the DSA tho—I feel like it’s disingenuous to call him just “a Democrat” (same with AOC)
AOC is a Democrat too, what is the issue? There are factions within the Democrats and she's in one of them but afaict she is nowhere near as radical as she was depicted as being. Part of that is from getting slapped around by the leadership I'm sure.
Yeah, he's not corporate enough. Let's kick him out. Why do we keep losing? Must be the progressives we keep insisting aren't welcome.
Funny how the gop are calling him socialist when it’s they who have free healthcare and live off public money.
"socialism" in the sense of the french revolution, where they executed lots of people with the guillotine, must never happen again.
The problem with killing people is that it's a lot like eating potato chips: Once you start, it's impossible to stop.
Look at the Reign of Terror that immediately followed the French Revolution. They basically continued to kill people after all of the nobles were gone. These actions discouraged a lot of people and were one big factor that scared potential revolutionaries in other countries away from trying a revolution in their home country as well.
Take the rich's resources, but don't kill them.
"Tax the rich", not "eat the rich".
That is socialism for the 21st century.
The french revolution, atleast the one you are referring to, was a bourgeois revolution and decidedly not socialist. It was the rising merchant class overthrowing the feudal class structures that held back their ability to obtain capital. It was not the proletariat overthrowing the capitalist class structures which hold us back. If you try and take property from the rich they will kill you for it. This has been endlessly proven throughout history, every workers revolution has a violent counter revolution from the bourgeois. Will you roll over and take it? Or will you defend yourself and the revolution?
I have seen too many rich assholes actually go to jail, then just get out a few years later and continue the same grift.
Fuck this softy nonsense.
Keep talking in ways that highlight progressive values, and you'll get more of this.
The status quo is garbage and has been degrading rapidly for most of my life. Here's hoping the rest of this country gets its shit together in time.
top 87 comments