We forced ourselves onto you after you repeatedly said no. Why are you so upset? Look how many jobs we replaced!

-Microsoft CEO right before the guillotine's blade falls

Edit: This cross-post about AI potentially replacing almost 12% of jobs off the bat seems relevant.

all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 60 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    "Guy whose day is filled with ass-kissers who say AI is useful is confused when presented with something contrary"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 11 months ago
    [–] 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    AI CEO has to be one of the dumbest sounding bullshit job titles Ive heard in a good long while.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    I hope every one of these brain dead CEOs catches some sort of STD that turns their dick into hamburger meat.

    Fuck them for creating this dystopian hell we live in.

    #freeluigi

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I swear every current problem from dumb shit head decisions has got to be because all of these things are being run by dumb shit head nepo babies now. They get this shit handed to them and they’re too fucking stupid to do anything right or they just legitimately don’t care and are just trying to make themselves as much money as they can get away with before everything collapses below them.

    Either that or tech bros really are just all this fucking dumb.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 8 points 11 months ago

    they just legitimately don’t care and are just trying to make themselves as much money as they can get away with before everything collapses below them.

    This one. In addition to their greed, publically-traded corporations are stautorily required to maximize profits for the shareholder. So, if there's a thing that will replace workers for less than it costs to have workers, they will do that thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Here's my explanation: how you treat ChatGPT today, is how people at the top end of silicone valley have ALWAYS treated their assistants, and anyone "below" them.

    They're surprised that you don't enjoy having the simulation of someone you can hurl abuse at, make demands of, and call an idiot - who has to stick around and take it. The perfect underling.

    They're reproducing their own lack of empathy, and surprised that YOU don't want to be like them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Where's the microsoft dick sucking CEO?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Co Pilot ommitted whole lines from a summary I asked for, then argued that they werem't left out. I guess gaslighting is built in from the top.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    I was more impressed with that skeleton hand coming out of a box to grab my coin. Different times.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    This sounds like a dysfunctional relationship, doesn't it?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago*

    Just about every site now has some barely functional chatbot that hijacks the screen and demands your attention. I want to read the content on the site, not interact with a poorly programmed simulacrum that can give me inaccurate and nonsensical info.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I wonder how much HE uses this wonderful AI...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Probably all day. His job isn't that hard and he clearly has the personality type for ai psychosis. I'm sure he's having long nonsensical conversations about his grand ideas while the chatbot eggs him on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    He should accessorise that jumper with a combadge

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago*

    Honestly I think LLMs are impressive pieces of kit. However, they have huge flaws which means they are only really applicable to a very very small subset of applications and need both ai expert and subject matter expert supervision.

    If I were to run a devastating anti-LLM campaign, I’d go around telling people they are perfect (which they clearly are not), and shove them into all applications imaginable (to drive the point home that they suck) and wait for the revolution.

    So, welcome to the resistance, Mr Suleyman.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    More non-tech people need to watch Silicon Valley and understand how close to reality it is.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    How are we supposed to take someone seriously when they're wearing a Wesley Crusher Season 1 sweater?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Of course people are unimpressed by failures. What did he expect?

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    All three are equally stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Metaverse is infinitely stupider. They set their money on fire to make an uncanny, family employer-friendly vrchat. NFTs are just a grift nowadays

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Man, this should have not be in the headline.

  • source
  • 37 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    33 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    12 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post