Are millennials also the first generation to have lower standards of living than their parents? I think housing costs is the biggest part of that.
post
I was repeatedly told that when I got older I would "understand" why policy makers made the terrible decisions they did, and that it was immature to believe they were cartoonishly evil.
Instead, I learnt that the reality was even worse than cartoonishly evil.
A lot of things suddenly get explained when one becomes aware of the traits associated with Psychopathy and Sociopathy and how around 5% of humans are high in the spectrum for one or the other.
In my own experience, certain kinds of behaviors are incredibly hard to believe in (deep down, emotionally, even if intellectually one does) when a person has an average or above average level of empathy: when you have a normal level of empathy it's pretty hard to put yourself in the shoes of and naturally accept that some people are casually and without any feeling of guilt the kind of person who, for example, couldn't care less if their personal-upside-maximizing actions hurt even little children or puppies as long as they didn't get reprisals from others for doing it.
Instead, I learnt that the reality was even worse than cartoonishly evil.
Yeah, it's saying something when you figure that IRL villains are very often worse than the mustache-twirling villains featured in comic books.
The banality of evil.
Probably because they've yet to see a right-wing government complete a 4 year term without a calamity occurring.
I'm 100% serious.
What generation has seen that, though?
I asked an AI:
when was thr last time a Republican president completed a 4 year term without a catastrophic event happening
Calvin Coolidge (1923–1929)
Calvin Coolidge, a Republican, completed a full four-year term from August 1923 to March 1929 after succeeding Warren G. Harding, followed by winning election in 1924 for a nearly full second term.[1][2] His presidency occurred during the Roaring Twenties, marked by economic prosperity rather than immediate catastrophe, though the Great Mississippi Flood in 1927 prompted limited federal response.[3][4] Scandals from the prior administration lingered but did not erupt into a defining crisis under Coolidge, who distanced himself effectively.[5]
No Republican president since Coolidge has completed a full four-year term without a major event widely viewed as catastrophic. Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961) managed two terms amid Cold War tensions like the U-2 incident, Suez Crisis, and civil rights struggles, but these defined his era as turbulent.[6][7] William Howard Taft (1909–1913) finished one term but alienated progressives, leading to party splits without a singular disaster.[8]
Earlier examples like Chester A. Arthur (1881–1885) involved party defeats and reform pushes post-assassination, not uneventful stability.[9] Defining "catastrophic" as economic collapse, war, scandal, or disaster, Coolidge stands as the last with relative calm before the 1929 crash under Hoover.[10][3]
Citations: [1] List of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States [2] Presidency of Calvin Coolidge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Calvin_Coolidge [3] Calvin Coolidge: Impact and Legacy - Miller Center https://millercenter.org/president/coolidge/impact-and-legacy [4] In 1927, Calvin Coolidge refused to provide aid during the Great Mississippi Flood, despite six governors requesting it. He also refused to visit the disaster zone. https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidents/comments/1m5q805/in_1927_calvin_coolidge_refused_to_provide_aid/ [5] The Last Time a President Got a Pass on a Scandal- ... https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/06/calvin-coolidge-scandals-donald-trump-226576 [6] Dwight D. Eisenhower - Key Events - Miller Center https://millercenter.org/president/dwight-d-eisenhower/key-events [7] Presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Dwight_D._Eisenhower [8] William Howard Taft | Biography, Accomplishments, Presidency ... https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Howard-Taft [9] Presidency of Chester A... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Chester_A._Arthur [10] Major Crises During Every US Presidency | Stacker https://stacker.com/stories/politics/major-crises-during-every-us-presidency [11] What Happened the Last Time Republicans Had a Majority ... https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/1928-congress-last-time-republicans-had-a-majority-this-huge-112913 [12] Presidents Who Didn't Win a Second Term https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0812/5-presidents-who-couldnt-secure-a-second-term.aspx [13] Presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Lyndon_B._Johnson [14] 50 Worst Decisions In American Politics' Last 50 Years ... https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-lists/worst-decisions-american-politics-1974-2024-1234940313/ [15] Every single republican president since Theodore ... https://www.reddit.com/r/AskConservatives/comments/16uufz4/every_single_republican_president_since_theodore/ [16] Life-changing disasters have shaped our modern presidents https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3848362-life-changing-disasters-have-shaped-our-modern-presidents/ [17] Remember last time a republican president had their 2nd term? https://www.reddit.com/r/economy/comments/1lq8kqn/remember_last_time_a_republican_president_had/ [18] Main Events of the Eisenhower Presidency, 1953-61 http://www.kansasheritage.org/abilene/ikeeven.html [19] William Taft - Key Events - Miller Center https://millercenter.org/president/william-taft/key-events [20] Chester A. Arthur: Impact and Legacy | Miller Center https://millercenter.org/president/arthur/impact-and-legacy [21] Calvin Coolidge - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin_Coolidge [22] Timeline of the William McKinley presidency - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_William_McKinley_presidency [23] List of Republican Presidents https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-republican-presidents.html [24] Benjamin Harrison https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Harrison [25] William McKinley Event Timeline https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/william-mckinley-event-timeline [26] List of presidents of the United States https://www.britannica.com/topic/Presidents-of-the-United-States-1846696 [27] A String of 6 Forgettable U.S. Presidents https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/history/american/a-string-of-6-forgettable-u-s-presidents-151452/
umm? gen x here. lefterer every day.
The author probably forgot about Gen X like almost everybody else.
Badum tish!
Though I think at this point most of us are comfortable being stealth mode.
I doubt it.
Gen X Features Musk, Bezos and Joe Rogan. Can’t think of any significant leftists ATM (I could if I took more time and didn’t have confirmation bias for the purposes of this response, lol). AOC & Mandahmi…Millenials.
Note: I’m Gen X.
Me too, but half my senior class has gone bugfuck MAGA. That's why I left FaceBook in 2016 or so.
Atari Gen here . Born in 1980. I'm in rural Tennessee. Started out super right... As I've gotten older I've moved further and further left.
My political views these days are summed up by this..
I want my gay married neighbors and their adopted trans kids to be able to defend their land and their legal pot plants with full auto imported ak47s. And of course if something happens.. they can go to the hospital and use their universal health care.
It goes a little further than that.. it that's a good start.
I know a few people in rural US who made the jump from a super right US Libertarian position in late-teens/early adulthood all the way over to Marxist positions. I'm not certain, but I suspect that the US Libertarian and Republican mindsets are often normalised there so people are raised with them by default, but a lot of the underlying ideas that validate the US Libertarian position, like individualism and "freedom", work better as abstract ideas and tend to break down upon inspection. Most of the additional freedoms of the US don't matter when people don't have the money, health and other resources to make use of them. It just allows the rich and powerful to trample the rest.
Me too…but we’re outliers.
SO many people who I thought were cool turned out to be morons…an alarming amount of them were radicalized in the pandemic. Even many of the people I know that think they’re devout leftists seem to feel they need to have one or more “edgy” views that cause them to caucus with radical centrists or right wingers. Like…my bi hippie friend started voting conservative because Palestine…my own lefty brother started voting conservative because of guns. Just found out a very poor ex girlfriend voted conservative because of right wing views on addiction. Then you have all the insane tankies…if you explained horshoe theory to them their heads might explode from the cognitive dissonance.
Quite easily explained: older generations accumulated wealth as they got older, so the central message of the right "I got mine, fuck you" (paraphrased) resonated more with them.
Newer generations only accumulate debt.
Id say, in addition to your very valid point, that this generation is the first to have this level of access to the un-skewed plight of those able enough to voice or show their situation. The Internet, social media, direct messaging around the world, is giving a very cold view of the world to an increasing number (as the older generations die out and new generations are becoming more cynical and media literate or aware) and it is highlighting how the gears of the world, too large enough to visualise on your own, actually turn and for whom they turn.
This is important to emphasise. Older generations were, generally, in more of a bubble, it wasn't easy to spread word with the same reach and authority as national mass media before the Internet.
Similar situation with other communication advances, like the telegraph, which allowed news of the world and the people around a country to learn and co-ordinate much better than before.
It was a baby boomer/greatest generation thing. The generation that served in ww2 benefitted greatly from massive programs to aid returning veterans, thus fueling both education, home ownership, and post-war consumerism. They were able to pass that onto the generation that came after, the baby boomers.
By the time the youngest baby boomers became adults the systems that allowed them and their parents to accumulate wealth began to be dismantled. Neoliberalism didnt happen in a day. It took years to fully tear the old system apart and years before the effect would be fully felt and visible. By then the older people cannot associate the 'now' with the events of several years ago, and younger people have never experienced the things that their parents did.
In short. The version of capitalism that WW2 veterans in the West lived with after the war 'worked' for them, while Communist regimes, most of which were built on exploited colonial holdings, or war torn nations that were never developed to begin with... Eastern Europe was much poorer than Western Europe even before WW2, and after WW2 they were both poor and bombed to hell and back. Vietnam was a French colony and the Vietnamese were fighting the French for liberation before they got taken over by the Japanese, who the Vietnamese also fought, before fighting the French and the Americans afterward. China was the USSR of the East... and also extremely underdeveloped.
This means seeing authoritarianism and poverty in 'Communist' regimes while seeing wealth in the US, Canada, the UK, and France after ww2 (which were built heavily on US aid and some where never bombed, like the US and Canada... and France adopted a fuckload of government intervention that fueled their growth) was something that people of that time would associate with those regimes, making it easier for them to think that the socialism there is what caused the poverty when in reality that was simply their starting position and not the end result.
The shit we are seeing now is basically disproving all of it. Russia has been 'capitalist' for 35 years now and they are still heavily underdeveloped in addition to being more authoritarian than it was under certain soviet regimes. Shit that was affordable and easy in the West, even in bad economic times, is now becoming prohibitively expensive. Food production is still extremely high and food waste is incredible... but food prices are continuing to get worse and worse.
Also for those who care to look at things from an actual historic perspective, it is becoming apparent that the reason why shit was good in the past was not due to endless economic growth but social policy and legislation.
Building more houses and apartments is pointless. There are too many apartments and too many houses. They are expensive because housing turned from making places to live to a speculative market. This is why Canadian cities are unlivable now.
Exactly. Boomers had the privilege of owning a home, building up savings, got pensions, and got to retire early. Gen x got most of those privileges, except maybe pensions... now millenials are pouring all their savings just to own a home, and social security is unlikely to exist by "retirement". And gen alpha are going be entering adult hood with 50 year mortgages? Gee, wonder why the young population is questioning the economic system.
I was just talking with my dad at Thanksgiving. He mentioned that a lot of young soldiers bought expensive cars when he just joined the army. I said that's definitely true. He said that he didn't.... he paid off his college.
So he put off buying a new car.... for 6 months. 😑
Exactly.
Even greedy millennials who are very low on the whole "wanting for others to be well, not just myself" kind of feeling and personal principles are themselves experiencing how it is to be born under the boot and realizing one is destined to be under it until the day one dies, and that feels bad, it feels unfair, it makes you want to "fuck this shit up".
It's not that millennials are inherently better or worse than other age groups, it's that they're far more likely than older generations to be familiar with being relentlessly victimize by present day society, through no fault of their own and merely due to something they were born with (specifically the "when they were born").
Basically far more of them know how it feels to be born poor in a society that gives you almost zero chances to climb up from that no matter how capable you are and how hard you work, than previous generations.
You know which countries had Communist revolutions? The kind with lots and lots of poor people with zero chance of improving their lot, such as Czarist Russia.
Because everything is fucking my shit up and family is worth less than nothing. Older generations got some personal benefit from fasch policy as they aged.
Me, I just see it proven evil and stupid literally every single day. Hard work just gets you more debt. Ownership is fake unless youre already wealthy. The law doesn't protect me. The government is not my friend. The people in charge dont know what they're fucking doing unless there's a child in the room-and in that case I'd rather not know, but keep finding the fuck out. We know we don't get to retire.
It's a material interest thing. And at this point a lot of us aren't dumb enough to betray our comrades for the scraps our grandparents go6 by age 30.
I’m doing pretty well, personally. I’m in my late 30s, I own a condo that I bought myself - not inherited, and I have a good job with job security. I’m not saying this to brag but I am saying this to say that anecdotally, I have never understood the notion that as you get older, the more conservative/Republican one becomes. And just to heep en the anecdotes, the above is pretty much everyone I work with and everyone I know professionally.
Maybe all these so called lefties that came out of the sexual revolution/hippie/peace and love-era and turned conservative…just weren’t particularly good people to begin with. Maybe being a hippie and smoking weed and being sexually adventurous in your younger years, was just that. Fun. The political ideology was just ‘fashion’ that enabled the lifestyle. But then they got bored or it became more fun to be wealthy when mom and dad handed them the keys to the house and got them the cushy corporate job - but they were always shit bags, even when they were young, so called “liberals”.
I don’t know. I didn’t live through what Boomers and Gen-X modern conservatives, formally liberals, lived through. I just have a hard time believing anyone in 2025, that lines up ideologically with modern day Republicans, can possibly be a good person. It would need thorough explanation to convince me that they formally had an ideology that lined up with mine. I can’t even begin to comprehend a justified rationale for becoming conservative. It seems like horseshit to me.
How do you think the hippies afforded that lifestyle? Most of them had rich parents. They were kumbaya because they didn't have to worry about anything, not because they had any sort of solidarity.
Maybe all these so called lefties that came out of the sexual revolution/hippie/peace and love-era and turned conservative…just weren’t particularly good people to begin with.
This is what the past year has taught me about my ex-hippie father. It was always just an aesthetic for him. Major bummer.
Yeah but I'd rather find why they sucked than pat myself on the back and congratulate myself for being a good person.
This. I was born middle class to a family who was first generation to go to Uni. Left Uni with $1,000 in the bank (no debt), and ended up a millionaire in my 30s due to hard work and a lot of luck.
I'm pretty damn progressive. Fuck the Republican/Democratic party. We need UBI for free food and housing. And a wealth tax.
Right wing parties feed on fear: the fear of losing what you have.
Millenials have had no chance to build anything to lose. They're not self contained fiefdoms jealously guarding Whats Mine Is Mine, they rely heavily on social groups and community.
Heh... as Marx got older, he moved from around -5,-5 on the political compass, to around -10,0.
Yeah. Maybe age alone is not the driving criteria. ;)
Maybe people just say that to make those prone to following do that.
That and the money. "No. It's mine."
We millennials were deprived of all of that.
It me. I have always considered my self “left” in the American sense, but high school me would have scoffed at my adult self adopting the socialist label.
This. I was a... "centrist" until I got a job. Now I hate capitalism as a system. Full stop.
If you're American, what you are experiencing is oligarchy. (And now kakistocracy. 🙄) You're making the same mistake as conservatives who point to the Soviet Union saying, "See! Socialism doesn't work!"
This horseshit is not what Adam Smith was talking about. In fact he warned that capitalism would be utterly broken were monopolies allowed. And here we are.
Look at our media, news, social media, entertainment, banking; all monopolies owned and controlled by oligarchs. We've let them slide into these mergers because of our overstrict definition of a monopoly, one company in control of a sector. We basically have two phone types to choose from. That's a monopoly.
Lina Khan, Biden's FTC Chair, was our last, best hope of walking this back. But be of good cheer! Mamdani has hired her, so she's still in the game!
EDIT: Forgot to go off about union busting and their near-total lack of power. Unions are perhaps the most powerful tool for healthy capitalism.
It’s all capitalism.
Healthy capitalism is like saying healthy cancer.
It's strange to treat oligarchy and the trend of capital towards consolidation (monopolisation) as if they're distinct from capitalism and not mechanically promoted by captialism itself.
To do what Adam Smith demands, putting a leach on capital under capitalism, is a contradiction that is difficult or impossible to maintain, as we've seen. When a company has enough money to punch above the rest, they have the power to buy stakes in mass media news and other propaganda, they can bribe politicians or use their power to promote and empower the ones they can bribe, and they can do the same with institutional anti-corruption systems like lawmakers, judges, police. To inoculate a society against this power of the rich basically requires a departure from liberalism/capitalism itself, revoking the "freedom" of private capital owners to exclude others and abuse their position.
It me.
Leftists NOT_RICK, who does 509642577 leftisims a day, is an outlier and should not have been included in the study.
Maybe because concervativism went from stay at home mom's to ethnic cleansing and genocide.
"First generation to be worth a damn"
No matter how good or bad your situation is, turning right is like gouging your own eyes out. It makes the situation worse for literally everyone. Even the hyper rich would be better off under a more left paradigm.
No shit. We are living in a worse time of inequality than the gilded age.
Saw our boomer and genX parents ride the rise, told it'd be ours too, only to witness everything taken away, revealing only the lies remaining; the false promises that daddy corporation would take care of us all.
On a personal note, saw my parents throw away their entire 2 million, cost me a million in effort through blackmail, slavery, torture and fraud, and then inverted my efforts, so it's like they managed to throw away 4 million, and then I'm there with the government doing waves of culls of the disabled poor by cutting them off to starve, denying them even the pittance (~ I've heard said, disabled people's costs of living are 4-10 times higher, and, so, why is the top rate of disability support income less than half what they say is the living wage?)... yeah, the inequality keeps going down all the way. Not just comparing the billionaires and trillionaires to the working class and upper precariat. ... All while knowing the technology exists to emancipate everybody to lush abundance... Buuuut, is suppressed, because, ' gotta keep those rents and regressive tax extortion and usury flowing, eh?
Sucks being dependent on your abuser.
... Will not be televised.
I know anecdotes aren't data, but I'm a millennial who moved further left with age.
I started left, but am now more vehemently so.
Maybe as a group ? but I am cis white Gen X and started out as middling conservative in my eary 20s, now green environmentalist and anarcho-socalist at 58.
How anyone can age, look around at the enviormental devestation, including climate change enhanced catastrophes that are going to get much much worse along with vast inequality and think this is good lets keep doing this, is bemusing beyond my ability to understand.
We're in the post-truth era. People have been taught that scientific consensus is equal in weight to their feelings on an issue. Climate change can be dismissed as fake news even though there is abundant evidence, it's a disturbing thought so it can just be thrown out.
They’re out there. Go check out comedians.
“Uhhh, you can’t say anything anymore. PC police will come cancel you.”
No. You suck. Your misogynistic and racist jokes aren’t funny. No one owes you their money.
If those same comedians woke up in the 1980s or 1960s they would still be booed out of venues. They aren't funny. Just not fucking funny at all. Hell even if they went back in time to the 1920s when blackface was 'normal' they would still not be popular since all they would do is make racist jokes for the sake of racism and audiences would not be amused. Not because they wouldn't be racist, but because the jokes just suck.
If the problem is that they aren't funny then why isn't the solution to simply not listen to their jokes?
Because they keep getting multimillion Netflix deals years after being “cancelled”:
Gen X I've only gotten more liberal as I've aged
Less uptight, more open-minded in general.
Really? Because they are the generation most likely to vote republican
I have an in-law that fits the bill, "closet MAGA" you could even say. But I'm in the South US, so skewed right is common here
I remember a health care video interviewing someone that got cancer. They said "we did everything right and we're bankrupt." Everything right meaning getting a degree, good job, etc and they got fucked.
This, exactly. Boomer hippies were all about "sex, drugs, and rock and roll." And as they got older, they watched their friends OD or burn out or just get tired of it and settle down, and when they sold out they actually got a decent price for it. And so they say, "ah, progressivism might sound fun when you're young, but you'll grow out of it, like we did."
Millennial progressivism is a different thing entirely. Here in the US (the article is about Australia, but the trends are similar), our progressive movement focused on healthcare. Some journos even commented on how it was strange that all these young, healthy people were rallying around that. It's because we understand that we're all walking on a tightrope over a fucking abyss and all it takes is one thing going wrong and everything will go to shit and you'll be left begging for scraps on the sidewalk, because there is no safety net, because society doesn't take care of anybody. It's a sort of mentality that hasn't really been seen since people lived through the Depression. And we're hardly going to get less concerned with healthcare as we get older.
I don't see my friends burning out on sex, drugs, and rock and roll. I see my friends burning out on working back-to-back 60's at Amazon. I get older, and I see more and more people working hard, doing everything right, and still getting screwed over by capitalism, in one way or another. And what do you even get for selling out these days? They stiffed the fucking guy who turned in Luigi.
PSA: Stop calling it a safety net.
It's a system. You're supposed to pay into the system, and then the system is supposed to work for you. You're supposed to use it. A safety net you're never supposed to use. I think conservatives like to call it that to paint the idea that you're not supposed to use it, if you use it that means you failed, and that it shouldn't be the primary system.
Millennials are the first generation to move left as they age
I told you boomers I was gonna do that, when I was 17, already coming out of my corporate-fanboi phase of my teens. "Afukinatoadaso"
Glad there are millennials who came after me doing so too. Unsurprising, given what we went through. Well done capitalism, selling out our futures.
Now I just hope more remembered it's freedom too, and not just jumping boat from Big Baron into the arms of Big Brother (or Big Bully, or Big Bank, or Big Blight, or Big Bot).
Like ol Mikey Bakunin said: "We are convinced that freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality." -- Mikhail Bakunin https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakunin
[Edit... it's only early to mid 40s for the first Millennials so far... We'll see if that sticks. As the saying goes, "60's the new 40".]
Spending several decades of my life hearing right-wing politicians and voters tell me that my "lifestyle choice" is bad, that I'm a degenerate who is ruining the country, that I don't deserve equal rights, that I deserve to be executed, and so so many other repulsive things like that definitely pushed me towards the other direction, politically.
Truthfully though, even if I weren't a part of the LGBT+ population, all the other ridiculous stuff would have been more than enough on its own to turn me off to right-wing politics.
Realistically, I think it's the authoritarian core of it mixed with the anti-intellectual principles that I always found off-putting. Although I never would have guessed we'd end up where we are in the USA back when I was a kid, this all honestly makes sense.

top 98 comments