Google’s Gemini team is apparently sending out emails about an upcoming change to how Gemini interacts with apps on Android devices. The email informs users that, come July 7, 2025, Gemini will be able to “help you use Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities on your phone, whether your Gemini Apps Activity is on or off.” Naturally, this has raised some privacy concerns among those who’ve received the email and those using the AI assistant on their Android devices.

top 93 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

im using OP12R and uses google, but i dont if it has gemini as integrated in it as a pixel does?

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    I swear all of this was predicted to happen by open source advocates of the 80s and they'd be called alarmists/whatever and then 30 years later you had Snowden leaks and all the surveillance bills and now Microsoft, Google, and Apple are all advertisement companies mining data through the software and devices they sell

    The best people can do is just keep using and advocating for Linux adoption. Try out degoogled Android or a more traditional Linux phone device. Need more users and funding to get the software kinks worked out. They're not as good as the high end Android and Apple stuff, but it's a process

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I've been struggling with figuring out how to get google off my phone. I don't know if I'm doing a bad job of searching or if I'm just dumb, but are there any good communities in Lemmy you can recommend on the topic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Just searched degoogle in Lemmy

    https://lemmy.world/c/degoogle@lemmy.ml

    There are levels to it. The advanced level is using a custom Android ROM for your phone that has no Google play services/apps on it and that'll depend on what's available for your phone from community ROM makers. You can see if any of these support your phone or plan any future phone of yours around these

    https://itsfoss.com/android-distributions-roms/

    An easier first step is just starting with non-Google apps. You can start with replacing Google apps like replace Maps with Organic Maps or something similar. Replace Gmail with something like Proton Mail. Same with calendar and cloud storage. Proton has alternatives. They even have an okay Google docs feature. Use a different search engine like duckduckgo rather than Google.

    F-droid as an app store. Instead of Google authenticator use Aegis. Instead of Chrome use Firefox or a fork of it.

    It's difficult so a process over time of lessening dependency on Google applications

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    But what about banking apps and surch?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That is an issue that I imagine only being solved with a larger user base that banks don't feel like they can ignore anymore

    As the other guy mentioned, the website. All these apps are usually web wrappers anyways or some sort of cross platform software dev framework that does web/mobile so the website is usually pretty much the same as the apps

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Do you have any good material to degoogle Android??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just saw there's a sort of large Lemmy degoogle community

    https://lemmy.world/c/degoogle@lemmy.ml

    Personally I think it's a good start to just replace Google applications. Organic Maps over Google Maps. Proton Mail/Drive/VPN/Calendar over Google stuff. Firefox and forks over Chrome. Duckduckgo over Google search. After that you can maybe find an old old Google Pixel phone and then start flashing ROMs off XDA forums as practice before you try a newer more expensive phone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Pretty sure I disabled Gemini as one of the first things I did when I got my phone. But, yes when I read that, to me it did seem like a serious overreach for something that was going to be "on by default" for most users.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    How, its baked in? Gemini isnt installed on my phone but its there. Like the circle to search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Gemini is an app, I disabled that. I also shut off the key press and there's some other places you can turn off some of the automatic AI features, and also there's a setting to disable the "online" AI in general.

    But that's why in another comment I said, I am still not sure I turned it all off (or even if it is possible to).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You might be thinking of the normal Google Assistant

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Didn't Google replace the normal Google Assistant with Gemini on newer phones?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    At least on my pixel 7, they rolled out Gemini replacement but you could revert it to the classic assistant. It was slow, none of my normal commands worked, and it wouldn't find anything I was looking for just "answer my question". I asked it how to disable itself and it couldn't answer that though. You can probably find documentation online if you use an actual search engine

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can remove most apps using ADB. Universal Android Debloater is helpful for this, just make sure you read the comments for each app so you dont remove something you need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    I agree it would be concerning if I allowed Gemini access to my phone. Fuck that. This shit is exactly why I am on GrapheneOS.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Can you tell me about Graphene?

    I got bank and government ID apps (manditory. Denmark uses MitID for all government related things), but they require things like locked bootloaders and Google security features.

    Would those apps be functional on GrapheneOS?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    ew. Tell your government to stop mandating spyware.

    Graphene does let you re-lock the bootloader. IIRC, whether an app works depends on whether they require SafetyNet full, or just basic. I have so far only found one app that refuses to work. However... it looks like MitID was recently updated and no longer works.

    https://gist.github.com/lbschenkel/4199be415f2a139b64688ae74c92a7fc

    Starting on 2024-06-12, MitID have started using Google Play Integrity API during activation. This means that new installations will no longer work in GrapheneOS nor any other non-stock Android, as they are not certified by Google and will not pass the required checks. The app still works (for now) if you managed to get it activated before that date.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I can also recommend CalyxOS. Locked bootloaders, open source emulation of all Google's play services (meaning an open source binary running on your phone, filtering requests to Google's servers with absolutely minimal/random info).

    Basically I have anonymized access to the play store, and any apps I install other than Google pay work, no issue. I believe even Google's secure features work. There's a reddit post about MitID: https://www.reddit.com/r/CalyxOS/comments/w2ordg/a_proven_way_to_use_calyxos_and_banking_apps_etc/

    E: having read through the technical comments on graphene's forums, looks like play integrity prevents MitID from running. The service offers free code generators which hang on your keys though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    how do they make it mandatory? what happens if you don't have a smartphone?

    is it strictly mandatory, or is the alternative intentionally very inconvenient?

    I'm asking because it is very weird to me. but also, in my country also in the EU, there's this misunderstanding that it is mandatory, while actually it can be replaced with any 2FA code generator app. and then it has a bunch of administrative features in one place for convenience

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    MitID is hard-required to sign into anything government or personal information required. Previously people would be handed a key-card (a white, fold-out card with a bunch of numbers on it. The numbers were one-time use, so the card would eventually run out, requiring a replacement after a few months).

    These key-cards have been completely phased out. Now there is the MitID app or a key-device that is almost impossible to get (you'll basically have to prove that you don't have/can't use a smart phone).

    The MitID app has almost no features at all. It's specifically used for authentication. You log into the gooberment website or bank website, then a encrypted, constantly changing QR code pops up. You open the MitID app on your phone, scan the QR code, and then you gain access.

    This is all run through the private security company the Danish government has hired, called "NETS".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 217 points 1 year ago (31 children)

    Linux has become good enough to replace desktop operating systems.

    Now, we are back at square one. I’ll be the first to inaccurately declare, “This will be the year of the Linux phone.”

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    All I need is a good enough emulation of android apps to fool them (eg for banking).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Can you get by with web access? That's what I do and it's fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Depends who you bank with. Some desktop websites suck on mobile and some don't even allow certain actions on desktop. For some ungodly reason Wealthsimple requires me to do almost everything via app. It's one of the reasons I barely utilise their services.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Looking at postmarketOS for my phone too, so sick of this shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    PostmarketOS is cool, but as an actual phone replacement it is tough, at least last time I tried.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm looking at a Volla phone https://volla.online/en/

    But I also have no experience of Linux in general yet so I have no idea if this is a good move.

    I just really want to get away from android/apple/windows on all of my devices.

    I want SteamOS for desktop, because quite frankly gaming is all I really use a desktop for anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Isn't Android using a Linux kernel already?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, but the kernel is a low-level module that handles hardware, memory, and processes—it’s not what users interact with directly, so sharing the same kernel doesn’t make it all that similar as you’d think.

    What makes Linux feel like ‘Linux’ to users is the stuff on top: the userland—bash, coreutils, package managers, X11/Wayland, etc. Android replaces almost all of that, so even though it uses the Linux kernel, it doesn’t feel like Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Yes. IIRC it's based on latest LTS kernel with Google patches. So it's been "year of the Linux phone" for a while now.

    It's unfortunate that the slop they put on top of it is such a privacy nightmare. PostmarketOS is trying to change that and supports Plasma, Gnome, etc. But it's early days yet and still rough around the edges from what I've been reading.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I use Linux since debian 3.0 and I don't think Linux is ready to replace desktop os yet. The universe has come up with bigger and more powerful idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Linux had reached idiot parity with windows at least. Idiot proof OS is a fable that cannot be reached.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Maybe in "appliances" like the steam deck. There are still driver and software support issues. There's a big "familiarity" gap. There's a lack of pre-installed systems. We are not at parity yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You think there aren't driver and software support issues in windows 11?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 year ago

    "We spent a lot of money on this, so you're going to have it."

  • source
  • [–] 199 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

    Dear tech bros,

    We, the people, don't want to use your AI shit. Please stop shoving it down our throats. Thank you.

    Sincerely,

    -The people

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Is it really the people or just a subset of people that use Lemmy, the vast majority of people seemingly don’t care as is evidenced by the sheer number of people using things like social media.

    What might be important to use in this echo chamber isn’t reflective of society on the whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    It's mainly tech savy people who don't use it. Tons of people in companies use this shit. The number of people who use "ai" to take auto notes in meetings is insane. It's a massive security risk but they do it anyways thinking it won't be stored.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    It's mostly lemmy. In real life people go from amused to indifferent. I have never met anyone as hostile as the lemmy consensus seems to be. If a feature is useful people will use it, be it AI or not AI. Some AI features are gimmicks and they largely get ignored, unless very intrusive (in which case the intrusivity, not the AI, is the problem).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    If a feature is useful people will use it, be it AI or not AI.

    People will also use it if it's not useful, if it's the default.

    A friend of mine did a search the other day to find the hour of something, and google's AI lied to her. Top of the page, just completely wrong.

    Luckily I said, "That doesn't sound right" and checked the official site, where we found the truth.

    Google is definitely forcing this out, even when it's inferior to other products. Hell, it's inferior to their own, existing product.

    But people will keep using AI, because it's there, and it's right most of the time.

    Google sucks. They should be broken up, and their leadership barred from working in tech. We could have had a better future. Instead we have this hallucinatory hellhole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    They need a tech ethics board, and people need a license to operate or work in decision-making capacities. Also, anyone above the person's head making an unethical decision loses their license, too. License should be cheap to prevent monopoly, but you have to have one to handle data. Don't have a license. Don't have a company. Plant shitty surveillance without separate, noticeable, succinctly presented agreements that are clear and understandable, with warnings about currently misunderstood uses, then you lose license. First offense.

    Edit: Also mandatory audits with preformulated and separate, and succint notifications are applied. "This company sells your info to the government and police forces. Any private information, even sexual in nature, can be used against you. Your information will be used by several companies to build your complete psychological profile to sell you things you wouldn't normally purchase and predict crimes you might commit."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    How are you evaluating inferior? I like the AI search. It's my opinion. You have yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Well, in this example, the information provided by the AI was simply wrong. If it had done the traditional search method of pointing to the organization's website where they had the hours listed, it would have worked fine.

    This idea that "we're all entitled to our opinion" is nonsense. That's for when you're a child and the topic is what flavor Jelly Bean you like. It's not for like policy or things that matter. You can't just "it's my opinion" your way through "this algorithm is O(n^2) but I like it better than O(n) so I'm going to use it for my big website". Or more on topic, you can't use it for "these results are wrong but I like them better"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Traditional search often is also wrong, showing some 3rd party website or a link farm.

    With AI search I get a summary AND the result list, so I have more info to make a decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Well, yes, Google has been becoming shittier for years as they prioritize ads and fail to deal with SEO slop. You have to know what's a good source, but that was true even when we were doing research in libraries.

    The AI summary is making the problem worse. The information it provides is not trustworthy. It also deprives site owners from traffic. It's really bad on like every metric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    The AI summary is additive, I don't see how it makes it worse. I find it useful to save time and it's right in most cases, if I need something of vital importance (like the opening time for a shop) I don't use search results anyway, I go to maps where I expect to find a link to their official website (not trusting the opening hours on maps either).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't think it saves time on net if you have to read it and then go verify it anyway. Might as well go directly to the more trustworthy source in the first place! And if you don't care if your answer is correct, why even search? Just make something up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's just more convenient. I'm not usually Googling if a mushroom is poisonous, I'm Googling how to get the length of an array in python or something similar. If it doesn't work, I come back and look at the second result, which happens less than once a week.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I imagine even the fk_ai crowd appreciate the non-gimmick stuff as long as it is nothing like a chatbot

    Tiny example from Gmail:

    This is all over, and it can be super useful from time to time.

    They say “f AI!” but I mean sure they don’t want better searches than were possible five years ago? If it’s not sycophantic and confabulatory etc. etc.

    Good point on intrusivity

    PS

    PS: I translated news from Iran this week using AI tools and using traditional translators. Who would advocate for the garbage traditional translation—soon as I went the “AI” route, it was suddenly possible to understand what the journalists were trying to say. That doesn’t mean I want translators to lose their jobs, it just means I know what the best available technology is and how to use it to get a job done. (And does not mean just because it translates well that I will also trust it to summarize the article for me.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    The majority of people eat at McDonalds. It doesn't make it a good idea on your finances or health. Sheep gonna baa.

    If you for some reason think that megacorporations and big tech aren't monetizing the literal majority to the fullest extent of every single law they can break while getting away with it, you need to wake the fuck up. Big time. I don't know if this is some psyop from leddit or what but my doors stay closed, my android plays tablet mode with no sim. Thanks tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I've been trying to tell people for 15 years. It hasn't worked a single bit. It's frustrating that people think they have nothing to hide when their carelessness and lack of tech knowledge is ruining the future of the next generations. I just can't try to explain it to everyone. They don't link the relation at all. I thought maybe eventually, they would just get it, but here we still are...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The problem is there’s a fair amount of tech CEOs that insist this is the future and everyone needs to hop on which between the hype train, the amount of software peeps out of a job because of layoffs and the amount of snake oils salesmen out of a job because this eats google’s lunch this bubble is just ballooning. You have a lot of people hitching on this bandwagon hoping to sell shovels to the next gold rush.

    And for awhile everything is just gonna get shittier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago*

    yes but what if a company has the ability to create billions of close friends who can recommend sponsored products to you? why would it care about whether you want that or not?

    also bard was a way better name for google's LLM. it has its origins in an isaac asimov story about a robot who is programmed to tell random stories.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The companies keep preloading it on new tech, updating old tech so its there, preventing the option from disabling it from even being there, and disabling tech that can't use it.

    This. Shit. Can. Fuck. All. The. Way. Off!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›
    3 comments in c/degoogle@europe.pub view that post