all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I feel like if this passed we would end up using it as a free pass to nuke certain countries that we (not me, but you know) wanted to nuke anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago

    The US should start by defending LGBTQ rights in its own country first. They're not doing too great on that front lately.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    cant wait for america to invade algeria because they found oil they are homophobic, but saudi arabia "somehow" gets a pass

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'm LGBT. The US better stay in its fucking lane.

    I'm sick and tired of US overreach and I hope everyone who ever voted for or organised any military operation from the US suddenly dies of cardiac arrest in the most painful way possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    Same. I'm bi, and while I appreciate the idea/intent behind this move... I fully agree with you. We don't need the US to be policing anything beyond its borders, especially after they've proven to be an unreliable ally on literally anything and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Fortunately Trump is too homophobic to pass this.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    Yay pink washing American imperialism by a country that's eroding gay rights.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The defense of LGBTQ+ rights is in decline in the U.S, so the bill's only propose is for this headline. I guess gay politicans can be just as uselessly proformative as straight ones.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Typical American exceptionalism to believe that they should get to be the arbiter of right and wrong, when they do little else but get things wrong. Imagine the U.S. trying to bring "democracy" to other countries? Oh, wait...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Don't need worldwide, just USA. Like the military for example.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/queer_defense_front@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post
    [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    Nonono we're nat invading Venezuala for oil, we're invading Venezuala for twinks.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Can't even defend the rights of its own citizens.

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    It's not the color of your nukes that worries the world.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    That will involve a lot of war. Half the countries in the world will still jail or kill people for being gay let alone trans.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    This is perhaps one of the most absurd bills I have ever heard of, queer rights are not just under attack but literally being violated in this country. But no like a true American everyone else is the problem and we need to spread "freedom" abroad. This is the hight of liberal absurdity, they murder and rape as they please but when the bombs fall on civilians they have pretty pride flags painted on making it "progress".

    The tanks come smashing through homes and ruthlessly murdering the innocent but this time it has a pride flag on it so that makes it ok.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments