Well, differently from the movie, she can always "unchoose".

So she's actually as repugnant as he is, and her views are just as bad. I can't remember her name and I can't be bothered to look it up because fuck her, but she's a minor influencer in the Conservative sphere. She goes on the streets and does those stupid shock value "interviews" with strangers.

For anyone curious, this is from a series that a Lefty political commentator, Luke Beasley, did, where he and her sat together and tried to have measured discussions about their views. It was interesting, but it only went on for about 6 episodes, and it was rocky the entire way.

Its all up on YouTube. And I watched. And despite her showing the smallest glimmer of understanding occasionally, she ultimately could not be convinced to change her views. It didnt help that her vile ass husband was behind the camera the entire time.

Lastly, her husband didnt overtly say the above quote verbatim, but it was definitely heavily implied. This wasn't putting words in his mouth, its a legit view he has.

So long as she kept her mouth shut.
To talk.

also specifying, he only giving her orgasms, so theres no enjoyment on his end.

people only have a right to exist as long as they’re useful to society in one way or another.

And the view of the current conservatives in power in the US is that you can only be useful to society in very specific ways: For women, it's reproduction and home making, and if you dare break out of that you are "destroying society".

people only have a right to exist as long as they're useful to society in one way or another

Capitalism, you say? :-D

As an econometrician / data wonk, I'm pretty sure we are past 'plausible', more like well into 'you could do a legitimate scientific paper on this and essentially prove it, and now we're arguing over error bounds and precise methodology'.

Religion does this to them, the systematic and merciless repression of sexuality causes it to become an immense burden.

Not just for the ones in the closet either. Hetero people are told their entire lives that sex is bad and internalize that their desires are evil, then they get married and you expect them to suddenly have a healthy sexual relationship?

If you fail to get him boipreg, then it just means you are not masculine enough, and need to try again. And again. Until you get that butt baby.

Also the Roman elites literally only had sex with their wives to procreate. For pleasure they went to the brothel or fuck a slave or concubine.

I think they just romanticize Western antiquity which often saw sex as a manifestation of power and control rather than an expression of intimate connection.

But I like little puppy videos...

Really? All I need is that quote to know.

The only way to stop being gay is to never touch her again, otherwise you're touching someone who has touched a dick and by the transitive property that makes you gay. Touching your wife is gay.

If you interpret gay in the original meaning ("full of joy, merry, light-hearted, carefree") then yes, having sex with your wife can be gay sex.

someone warn the bees

You said dick three times in your letter. If you say the word dick that means you're thinking of a dick, and that makes you gay.

I don't really think it does. I'd think an awful bigoted woman would want to have an orgasm during sex just as much as anyone else.

Want and deserve, tho, are very different.

I pity his wife.

But he can get her off without his dick if he wanted