To be clear: There is nothing wrong with getting your suck on so long as all parties involved consent

(also shamelessly stolen from Strike at resetera)

all 64 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Absolute historical fact: Trump's (and Roger Stone's) political mentor was the psychopathic mob lawyer Roy Cohn, who died of AIDS in the 90s, denying he was gay to very end. One Republican leader said that Cohn wasn't gay, he just enjoyed sexually dominating young blonde men. Apparently that isn't gay in MAGA circles. Whatever you have to tell yourself...

Anyway, it should be noted that when Trump and Roger Stone were under Cohn's mentorship, they were both young blonde men.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (14 children)

    Unacceptable revisionism. We all know it's Russia. Russia here, Russia there, Russia everywhere, under the table, under the bed, behind the dryer, in the dishwasher.

    Everything except home-grown causes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    Go get a kalash enema pissant. The Ruskies can be enflaming pre existing issue and be creating them, this is often how long term espionage operations work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Uh isn't it spelled Ruzzkie? And you do realize you're just as much in a self-reinforcing fact-free conspiracy theory as any anti-vaxxer or UFO fan?

    You are fascinating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    You are fascinating.

    Here we see the average internet debatebro. They do not possess the necessary skills to participate in a discussion, so they instead attempt to use derogatory language to place themselves above their perceived opponents, where they are free to continue their delusions of grandeur.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    It's the Americanized spelling pissant, unless you are talking to a person from a Germantown or a similar minority language population folks ain't pronouncing an S with a Z.

    Second piss off with that "yous a conspiracist shit" both the CIA and KGB were confirmed to be doing such shit throughout the Cold war, now it's just some kid named Ivan being paid like it's McDonald's to convince meemaw that medbeds are real. Is it really so fucken hard to conceptualize that maybe just maybe a country historically and currently aligned against the West may just use agitators online to further enflame social issues? Because that's all they're fucking doing it's just piss easy when the lowest common denominators, scammers, and general asshats are all interacting online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, I'm beyond fed up with the "Russia Hoax" nonsense. It's not a "conspiracy theory," it is proven fact that the Russians have been manipulating not just our elections, but any elections that threaten to grow democracy and suppress oppressive right-wing extremism.

    None of this is new, we have been actively conflicting with them since the end of WWII. "The Cold War" wasn't just a marketing phrase, we really have been actively at war with the Soviet Union/Russia since 1945. The Russians have spent literally every second of every day, ATTACKING us in every way they can, short of weaponry. After all these decades, their widespread efforts have begun to coalesce, and bear fruit. Brexit, for instance, has been proven to have been driven primarily by Russian propaganda.

    For another instance, we also know for a fact that the Russians hacked into the DNC emails, because Dutch intelligence secretly had control of the security cameras in the room where the Russian hackers were operating, and literally saw the moment they started hacking (Immediately after he stopped his usual word salad speech, and turned to the camera, and clearly said "Russia, if you are listening...", obviously a signal that he was accepting their help), and their celebration when the hack succeeded. Dutch intelligence thought it was important enough to let American intelligence know about, so they burned their source to inform us, losing any chance to monitor the hacking room in the future. And what did the Obama administration do with this information, in combination with all the other intelligence they had about the Russians actively interfering in the 2016 election? Absolutely NOTHING. The Dutch burned an amazing source to inform us, for nothing. I'm sure they won't bother the next time.

    These things have been proven by our intelligence services, and intelligence services from around the world. It isn't just a political position taken just to be contrary to the other side, it is written history, and it is as stupid as stupid gets to deny it, and really really stupid to make childish fun of those who actually understand the Russian role in the modern world. You might as well be making fun of people who think the Earth is round. Denying the Russian Conspiracy make a person sound just as stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Thanks for going over the more direct examples that aren't just there to generally inflame societal bullshit to cause general conflict. I was mostly just going over the shit that everyone knows is already bot run which is far easier for me to recall info on and more or less wield Occam's Razor to make my point. One of the most flawed elements of my argumentative style is that I'm bad at specific information recall so I just default to attacking the logic instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I have a history degree, so it's my natural inclination to tell the story by highlighting all the important steps, so people can see how the situation developed. I might not remember exact dates or names, but the general story will be accurate.

    Early on, I learned that history is just the story of interesting people and events. I never understood why it wasn't everybody's favorite subject.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Fair enough, I guess if you have been taught how to do that on a practical level it comes more naturally. I can do that with story telling pretty easy but when I'm in an argument my recall ability may as well not exist so I just default to logic teardown, though that probably has more to do with me arguing with creationist and conspiracy theorist since attacking their data is pointless oftentimes while attacking the structure of their logic at least pisses them off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Valid. Some people do not respond to logical discourse because they don't possess Critical Thinking Skills, so they develop a chaotic ad hoc form of thinking that is difficult to interact with without trying to get them to control their logic first.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Only a Russian would misspell 'bed' as 'bad'. Nice try kaputchnik.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Trump has met every president since Nixon except for Ford. The US has been treating this wretched excuse for a human being like royalty his whole life.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago

    Oh fuck that took me a second

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (24 children)

    Who are these people? This one is going over my head.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (23 children)
    • Donald Trump (Blue suit; sitting US President)
    • Nancy Reagan (Pink dress; former US First Lady)

    It is alleged that in her day Nancy enjoyed giving head. Nacent revelations allege that Donald sucked off "Bubba" (presumably Bill Clinton, former US president) and that Putin has pics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Nacent revelations allege that Donald sucked off "Bubba" (presumably Bill Clinton, former US president) and that Putin has pics.

    ಠ⁠_ಠ

    What...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    What…?

    It has indeed been an amazing news day.

    My bingo card says Bubba was someone else, but not any less creepy and it being Clinton does make this the greatest timeline for now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    FYI, Bubba is predominantly/originally an African American nickname, originating in creole/mixed black communities of Louisiana meaning Brother, though there was widespread "cultural appropriation" in white south. So 50/50 on race if its not Clinton, but 90/10 on black or redneck vs Clinton.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    What the almighty fuck.

    The least plausible thing about this is that Putin has been able to keep his mouth shut about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The Putin part might have been an inside joke if they were aware of some blackmail. Then again, if he's blackmailing people... he'd have to be quiet about it... and it sure as hell appeared he had some kind of leverage on Trump around his rise to the presidency, we just all assumed it was russian tampering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, but imagine in 2016 claiming that the reason trump bows down to putin is because he has pics of trump sucking clintons dick.

    Do you have any idea how crazy that would sound, even yesterday? In 2016 you'd just have your post deleted for spreading false info.

    Except, it wouldn't have been false.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Shit. Can you imagine half the bingo carts we've seen since then?

    I mean, you're in the 80s and 90s and 00s, we were all blabbering on oh this would never fly back then. Yada yada, but since COVID... It just seems there's been a never ending stream of what the actual fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I'm honestly surprised trump hasn't in secret ordered someone to write "the Weinstein Files". A set of "government documents" about Harvey Weinstein.

    trump voice

    "There. I did it. I released the Weinstein files. Everybody asked for them, and I provided in a great way! Now everybody is happy, and we can all stop asking for the Weinstein Files. Horrible things in those files. Lots of sex stuff. Filthy perverts. But it's all out there now!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Not joining in with the actual reality here, because i struggle telling jokes and plants from truth, so whatever, but :

    If you release your blackmail material, you no longer have any control over the person youre blackmailing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    So wouldn't a picture of Trump with Monica Lewiński make more sense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    I don't know about "more." It would still make sense, but Nancy's head game was not an all together foreign concept.

    I'm guessing this picture was chosen for the "Game recognize Game" meme more because it's easier to find than a photo of Trump with Monica.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

    Okay I'm drawing a blank on this, who is she?

    Edit: Jesus what's with the downvotes? You guys do realise that not everything revolves around US politics and not everyone will be familiar with every single "famous" person you consider well known?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Nancy Reagan, President Ronald Reagan's wife. She had a Hollywood reputation for being the GOAT for blowjobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    The Men Who Rent Their Throats

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Looks like Ron is wearing a tan suit, uh oh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago
    [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    NO WAY! 🤣 How did you know they met?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Look at her face. I don't even have to know what he is saying to know that it was wildly inappropriate, but he thought it was really clever, and demonstrated how roguishly charming he is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    And are of consenting age.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Is it gay to blow Nancy Regan? I don't really get any references to the text, other than the look on her face could be "you're gonna be giving me head soon".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment