BREAKING NEWS: Liberal Party leader sells out entire country's future to save their own career.

BREAKING NEWS: Liberal Party leader sells out entire country's future to save their own career.

The government has claimed that reaching net zero is impossible.
Meanwhile, South Australia is on track to reach net zero early, and other states are accelerating their uptake of renewable technologies.
This government is not compatible with reality.
Net zero includes products made from oil too, right? Like, plastic.
For this specific case it means net zero carbon emissions into the atmosphere. Plastic isn't carbon in the atmosphere, so it isn't included in these figures.
Net zero is just the first step anyway. Once we reach net zero, we still need to work really hard to get to actual zero, then we still need to find a way to be significantly carbon negative if we want to try to slow the worsening rate of climate related disasters.
Hopefully, somewhere in that process, oil products will become non-viable.
Actual zero is impossible. "Actual net zero" is what we should aim for (climate accounting with offsets can get a bit freaky)
Plastic isn't carbon in the atmosphere, so it isn't included in these figures.
Sure is. Either by fire or by sun. Not yet, but in the same way that wood is only temporary bound CO2. With the difference that plastic is made from oil, not from already circulating C.
Edit: i should read the rest first, before answering, my bad.
Haha like they ever earnestly support any kind of climate target beyond selling off as much coal as possible to their pals
Can we change the title to:
How can the party look at the success of the Teal movement, which is essentially 'Liberals who care about climate', and not see the picture being painted? Surely you should look at all the seats you didn't win and ask "why?"
Because the party is more and more filled with right wingers as the moderates lose power.
I was so happy to hear about this! The Libs are digging their electoral grave deeper and deeper. I had an inkling that, because most of their seats lost at the last election were moderates, the remaining voices would all swing conservative and pull the party even further to the right. With this kind of rhetoric the Coalition isn’t going to be a viable option for government for at least another couple of election cycles.
I just really, really hope that votes for them move towards independents and other parties as opposed to bolstering Labor’s current lead.
The really stupid thing is that they aren't getting into government in the next election and probably not in the one after, so the energy transition is going to be mostly done by then. The elderly coal plants that the LNP wants to pour money into are going to be gone.
Coal power stations wear out, and we haven't built any new ones in 20 years or so. Many of them were built in the 80s and nobody's looking to fund new ones.
“The reason we lost the last election was because we weren’t enough like Trump” mouths the Coalition with Gina Rineharts arm up there arse.
In fairness to Gina, I don’t think she owns a coal mine or gas plant, but your point is still valid. They aren’t doing this for the environment or the people.
Gina Rinehart’s oil and gas investments include private firms Warrego Energy in Western Australia and Senex Energy in Queensland
Na, she does. In her defense I think her investments aren't the causal driver behind her whacko beliefs, i think it's the contextual bubble she has always lived within.
They must have a lot of faith in Gina being able to buy enough AI bots to swing elections for them without the Teal-voting former heartland seats or something.
Should change their name to Facebook Party because that appears to be who they're targeting
Time for us all to formally abandon the liberal party then...
I mean, we mostly already have. What I think they should be doing is looking at this simple fact and asking themselves what they can do to make themselves more attractive to the electorate. I don't think they're doing that, and that's a pity. I happen to want multiple viable choices for government. By taking themselves so far off the table as a choice they're limiting everyone's options.
I like the way you phrased it as - all the elected members got to vote, but not the unelected ones for obvious reasons.
Reminds me of the story about returning planes and bullet holes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
Gotta love "pledges"
Get all the credit for promising something you'll do in the future, don't actually have to do jack-shit when the time comes--simply abandon the pledge. It's too late for those that bought into the hype to get any sort of refund for their votes or support etc.
I think we are about to have the next generation of folks have the epiphany that the "climate change disaster" isnt what they have been told for the last 20 years. Ive seen many liberals eyes opened and realize they had been lied to for decades about "global warming".
Eh, they weren't gonna win the next election anyway. This is just gonna reinforce that. Hopefully the fully implode by then.
top 31 comments