all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What else would you need that many ports for? Genuinely don't know

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In industrial settings you often need to collect data from lots of low bandwidth devices. 36 usb-to-serial adapters or something.

    I can imagine a lot of other stuff too, like some kind of interactive display in a museum or art exhibition, with lots of IO and little computation. Anything that outgrows a Raspberry Pi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It could be useful if you need to load documents on a large number of flash drives to hand out for some event. It could also be used with a bunch of SDR dongles for monitoring a lot of different radio signals.

    I would assume they have multiple USB controllers, so there would be a lot more bandwidth available than just using USB hubs with a normal PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    No USB-C :(

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Note how they are all old school USB ports, and not USB C.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It's actually cheaper to use the USB 3 A ports then it is to use the USB C ports. There's a lot less wiring (and circuitry) that needs to be done for this amount of ports. A full spec USB C port has somewhere between 20-24 pins that are all used if you need USB 3.x speeds. A USB 3 A port has 9 that are used for full data speed. It's orders of magnitude less annoying to run that many traces on a board and keep the data speeds where they need to be.

  • source
  • parent