Doesn't have to be a binary file, toss the string in a txt file and the AV still throws a fit.

01001000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 00101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 01100110 01100101 01100011 01110100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01110000 01101000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01110000 01110101 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100110 01110101 01110010 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01101110 00101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101100 00101110 00101110 00101110 00100000 01000100 01101111 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01100001 01101100 00100000 01110011 01110100 01101111 01110010 01100001 01100111 01100101 00101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01100001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01111000 01101111 01111000 01101111

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EICAR_test_file

X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

A specific string of text that you can use to test your AV without actually grabbing a virus.

They actually thought it through, huh?

For some reason that surprises me from the AV vendors

But then add comma's what?

Almost line for line. A wall of XML popped up when I hit submit. Looks like yours went through.

Friend, we're still seeing publicly exposed plaintext credentials in 2025...

Is that an instruction?

SHIT

As observed by that legendary grammarian Dave Barry.

Don't

We live in a society!

It's OK for people to be offended by lazy editing. This isn't a language barrier problem, which would be an acceptable excuse. This is lack of attention.

Should work alright if the server handles Unicode correctly, and isn't one of those ass sites that put restrictions on the password's length and composition. Hashing functions don't even care if you're feeding them raw binary.

Everything you can use for a password can be escaped out of a csv. Partially because csvs have to be interoperable with databases for a bunch of different reasons, and databases are where your passwords are stored (though ideally not in plaintext). There's no way that I can think of to poison your password for a data breach that wouldn't also poison the password database for the service you're trying to log into.

If you're manually checking the 12 million username password pairs in the leaked database you aren't really going to breach many accounts before people update their passwords, are you?

Yup. Tis a joke.

Then I'm f'd because it's really hard to enter tabs in most password text fields.

Depending on the Interface, its gonna be CSV or more likely txt for burp or cred tools.