...I could have told you that 🤷

Source: https://x.com/BriannaWu/status/1984574165643403370

Not my usual kind of source (Xitter), but I want any centrists out there who ask trans people to "just get along" / compromise with actual hate groups that want them eradicated to know that it doesn't work.

There is no such thing as a reasonable bigot, by definition.

top 81 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

This is why advocating for "finding middle ground", or centrism, or this repackaged warmed over Abundance crap is so toxic.

You can't match these people half way. you have to beat them

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most arguments have a middle ground, but its a case by case basis. In this case the sides are:

    • let a marginalized group experience a little joy and feel comfortable in their bodies

    • refuse to accept that a middle school understanding of gender and biology might not be totally correct.

    Meeting in the middle here is how you get second class citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I see a lot of (often well deserved) shit talk about centrists/middle ground. Honestly, it IS silly to talk about middle ground between reason and raw hate. I do, however, doubt myself if I look around and find myself spouting the most extreme ideas on a given topic. How isnt that scary to people? I dont want to be the fanatic. I was raised with talk about the middle path and the golden mean. Virtue in courage is found between recklessness and cowardice. I still subscribe to that notion, but absolutely recognize how one can lull themselves into false means based on the prevailing culture (Overton window). Still, I dont see how it is that hard to have some bedrock principals, and use those to anchor a true middle ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "The problem is, they are getting crazier and crazier."

    They're not, they just don't feel the need to hide those parts of their goals any more, and you should have listened to us when we warned you about those goals.

    And you should be listening to us now about their future goals.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    They kinda are. Not at the fringes, there used to be targeted outing campaigns in the hopes of getting trans people fired or killed back in the day, but what was once extreme personal bigotry has become a pipeline and is increasingly legitimized by mainstream right wing politics. If you ask the average bush era republican if the medical establishment should be forced to institutionalize trans people, they'd reply with a slur for sure but they'd not support overriding medical institutions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago

    Goldwater was absolute dogwater but he was right about republicans in 1981…

    “On religious issues there can be little or no compromise. There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs."

    "Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them."

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Even after all of that, she still doesn't get it:

    I think many of our most extreme ideas are bad. But theirs are worse.

    The problem is that "our" (using quotes as I'm only progressive, not LGBTQ+) most extreme ideas are only held by a minority of progressive people, and meanwhile the things she thinks are their "most extreme ideas" are the ones that she saw personally, while interacting with people who don't mind interacting with a trans-woman. Those aren't their "most extreme ideas." They're their mainstream ideas.

    She's comparing our most extreme ideas against their mainstream ideas.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure who she's referring to when she says our there but whoever it is would be insane to invite her in with that take

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Also, she doesn't say what our most extreme ideas are. The most extreme idea she mentions is allowing trans-women to compete in women's sports. But I think that's probably a mainstream belief, and also the one that is best supported by science.

    (Meanwhile, the most extreme idea of theirs that she mentions is that trans-women should face non-stop violent rape if they go to prison.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Also, she doesn’t say what our most extreme ideas are.

    If I were to try to define the most extreme positions held by any in our community (in regards to trans issues), they might be:

    1. Bathroom access based on identity only. Very few people are actually like this. But some folks would say that all that is needed to switch bathrooms is identifying as a different gender. So it's perfectly acceptable for a person dressed in male clothing, with a beard, using a deep voice, etc. to use the women's restroom as long as they identify as female. Very few trans folks would be caught dead doing that. Most recognize that there is a certain give and take, a negotiation of social spaces. I imagine most would say you shouldn't have to pass in order to use the bathroom, but most would recognize that it's going to cause a ton of unnecessary friction and hate if someone fully masculine-presenting uses the women's restroom. I don't think people who can't pass should be banished from the bathroom that matches their identity. But I myself would be very uncomfortable sharing the women's restroom with an entirely masculine-presenting person, trans or not.

    2. Unrealistic/impractical pronoun expectations. Some folks confuse "gender is a social construct" with "nothing is real and nothing matters." Pronouns are a social construct. That doesn't mean they mean nothing; it means they have socially constructed definitions. If I invent a new pronoun tomorrow and start demanding others call me it, that isn't a social construction. That's just something I invented and am now imposing on others without their participation or consent. In order to socially construct something, there must be a meeting of the minds, a shared milieu of understanding. A pronoun, if you expect people to actually use it, can't be something you just invented. It has to be something negotiated among a large number of people. This is why the pronouns people tend to actually use are he, she, and they. Most others get little use beyond extremely online teenagers. Pronouns are meant to be shorthand for characteristics of your identity. If your pronoun is so unique that no one has any idea what the hell it means, you're not using a pronoun, you're just using a nickname.

    3. Sports based purely on identity with no qualifiers. I support trans women playing on women's teams and trans men playing on men's teams. But that's not just because of identity, but because I recognize that the science says that trans women don't have any advantages after a few years on HRT. I wouldn't however support trans women who still have male testosterone levels competing on women's teams. That's just about basic fairness. But, some would say that it's just sports, and that respect for identity matters more than athletic fairness, and that no one should have to seek out medical treatment they may not otherwise want. Fair enough, but I would disagree.

    Still, these are extremes. The vast, vast majority of trans people wouldn't switch bathrooms before at least changing their presentation, use pronouns they can actually expect other people to use, and wouldn't expect to switch sports teams without altering their own hormones. If TERFs really were interested in compromise, these are the issues we could compromise on. So maybe we restrict bathrooms based on legal identity, but in turn we make it really easy to change your legal identity, say up to once per year. And we have clear social expectations about the rules of bathrooms. So it's OK if you don't fully pass, but you shouldn't be rocking a beard in the women's restroom. Or, we come to a compromise on pronouns. You can have your close friends call you whatever you want, but the only pronouns you should expect others to recognize are the broad and generic he, she, and they. We compromise by, for example, making it workplace harassment to not respect someone's pronouns. But in turn we trans people also don't demand that people learn hundreds of new pronouns or start referring to human beings as inanimate objects. Or, we regulate sports, but we don't try to ban trans people from sports all together. We follow the science that says trans women have no advantage after a few years on E. You can't change your teams based purely on self-ID, but we do give trans men and women a clear and open path to participate fully and equally in athletics.

    If TERFs and other conservatives really were just looking for a reasonable compromise, these are the types of issues we could compromise on. But, as the post notes, you give these bastards an inch and they'll take a mile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • My proposition to solve the bathroom issue is making gendered bathrooms illegal and mandating proper cubicle walls that guarantee privacy. The harassment that gender neutral bathrooms are claimed to cause is vastly exagerrated by the right wing. It does not outweigh the harassment towards gender minorities that gendered bathrooms cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago

    once again ignoring entirely that trans masc people exist and we are impacted by the bullshit she spouts as well. what impacts one of us affects all of us, and I am not your fucking sister.

  • source
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago

    First off, Brianna Wu is not my sister or comrade, so she can write that down.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    In a negotiation its important to ask for more than you want. Compromise is what you reach during negotiations. If you start your negotiations from a pre-compromised position, you're just ceding ground to the other side.

    Support the extremists. Support those who go too far and ask too much, as that's the only way to reach a fair and reasonable compromise.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Is Brianna wu grifting to the left because she realizes there isn't a place for her on the right anymore? I'm a bit too cynical to believe this is legitimate since the right has been like this for quite a while. Just with the trump admin the center right position on the trans movement is not a profitable option for pundits anymore

    If this truly is a come to Jesus moment, I'll believe it if she can back it up over time

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    A good compromise is never just halfway between two policies. It requires understanding both perspectives and addressing their actual problems. So the compromise here would be trans rights for trans people, and free mental health care for anti-trans people.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The Trans Athlete debate also never seems to address the fact that it's all unfair from the get go. Being born to a poor family? Being born with a birth defect? Being born into an unsupportive family/community? Being born at the wrong time of year?

    It also shouldn't matter how well someone does in sports. No athlete is using their skills in the work place and students shouldn't need athletics scholarships to pay for school. It should just be for fun with nothing on the line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    In the real world, it doesn't even cause a real fairness issue. The Olympics started allowing trans competitors in the 90s, but there's never been a trans medal winner. If there was a real advantage, then you'd expect the best person at some sports in some counties to be trans, so there to be trans athletes competing, and their advantage to put them on the podium. You'd also potentially expect some countries to pad their team with trans people to get more medals. This hasn't happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting are also biologically male

    This is a lie. Wikipedia links to no fewer than 3 sources that confirm this is a lie. I will be blocking you.

    "Those cheering fans have embraced Khelif throughout her run in Paris even as she faced an extraordinary amount of scrutiny from world leaders, major celebrities and others who have questioned her eligibility or falsely claimed she was a man." -- https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/algerian-boxer-imane-khelif-fights-for-olympic-gold-after-enduring-abuse-fueled-by-misinformation

    'The participation of Algeria's Khelif and Taiwan's Lin has proved controversial given they were disqualified from the 2023 World Championships.

    "Let's be very clear, we are talking about women's boxing," said Bach at Saturday's daily IOC briefing.

    "We have two boxers who are born as a woman, who have been raised as a woman, who have a passport as a woman and who have competed for many years as a woman.

    "This is the clear definition of a woman. There was never any doubt about them being a woman."' -- https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/articles/c28e88jdprno

    'Khelif and a second boxer, Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, fell foul of IBA eligibility rules [...].

    [...] a March 2023 IBA board meeting stated that "the athletes do not meet one of the eligibility criteria", without stating which one.' -- https://www.reuters.com/sports/olympics/who-is-algerian-boxer-imane-khelif-2024-08-03/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    The sources people cite for Imane Khelif being biologically male are:

    • an opponent with a history of forfeiting after a single punch and claiming after the fact that her opponent was cheating and that was why she was forced to forfeit did it again. When she did that in the past with other opponents, there wasn't any assumption that the baseless cheating allegations were on gender/sex grounds.
    • The IBA, an infamously corrupt organisation with the infamously corrupt Gazprom as its majority owner disqualified her from a tournament without saying why. There are enough historic allegations of them disqualifying people for refusing to throw matches that it's plausible that the only reason she was disqualified was that she refused to throw a match they wanted to rig.
    • JK Rowling said she looked like a man. She does this a lot with a lot of cisgender women due to internalising unrealistic femenine beauty standards.

    People have claimed sex testing was done by an accreddited independent lab, but chasing that citation just leads to the IBA saying she was disqualified without elaborating why, which doesn't support the claim.

    There's no actual evidence to support the speculation. That doesn't mean it's untrue, but does mean it's unreasonable to present it as fact - there's just as much evidence for alternative speculation, e.g. that she bribed the opponent to forfeit and was disqualified by the IBA because they found she'd bribed people to forfeit in the past, and it would be just as unreasonable to spread that rumour I just invented around as if it were fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    An article with half a screenshot and a claim that they're the only media outlet that's seen the half a screenshot isn't the slam dunk you're presenting it as. There's no way to verify or debunk it, as they could have made it up or their source could have made it up, and if it weren't made up, the legal consequences for publishing medical information like that would be worse than the consequences for just making it up.

    If it is real, the article's still disengenuously pushing its own narrative, as the medical profession would still consider someone with those results a woman when the rest of their phenotype resembled a woman, but the article claims otherwise. There's no single test that definitively determines biological sex as there are too many factors that influence it, and about 1% of people are some kind of intersex, so would exhibit a mix of traits or have something they could be tested for that gave an obviously wrong answer.

    Either way, this whole discussion only strengthens my original point about the integrity of women's sports not being undermined by trans athletes - they're still permitted and not winning anything despite that, and other people generally recognised as cisgender women have bigger advantages while still being able to compete and having been able to compete since the inception of women's sport.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    The trans athlete debate was a solved problem before the right wing learned about it. Let the professional authority body of whatever sport, in collaboration with relevant medical professionals, determine what hormone levels or transition progress is qualifying or unqualifying in each individual sport in a case by case basis. Because we tried this before, with genetic testing of Olympic female athletes and enough turned out intersex or androgyn disordered that they stopped doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "You know, I'm starting to think these ethnicity-critical Nazis can't be reasoned with."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Wu is just the latest poster child for Reactionary Uncle Tom washouts. There's internet graveyards full of would-be pundits and ex-liberal turncoats who realized far too late that The Log Cabin Republicans and Blacks for Trump weren't going to protect them when fascists came knocking.

    The thing you need to recognize about Wu - more than anything else - is that she comes from money. Look at my Porsche collection money. She's reactionary because that's where she eats. And pivoting her identity as a Trans Woman into an income stream as a reactionary poster is just the path failkids of the GenZ+ generations are trained into.

    Brianna Wu is a product of her material conditions. In a better world, she wouldn't be able to horde wealth at her neighbors' expense. And she wouldn't have an economic incentive to fuck over her Trans peers in hopes of maintaining her precarious position among the wealthy elites.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Though I agree with you, i think there has to be a pragmatic aspect to this

    I want MORE right wing idiots to realize they're wrong and join our camp. The more the better. Remember, these people are still our neighbors, they still exist and we will have to interact with them outside our homes. I want more reasonable people, so when we do have converts, please receive them with open arms.

    Okay, you were a huge idiot, but welcome to sanity part 1. Of they're big enough to realize they were wrong (and they've had a LOT of brainwashing, it takes a lot for them to snap out of the crazy) we should be big enough to say bygones.

    If we don't we'll make it harder for people to move out of the right wing camp, and I want muchuch less people in the right wing camp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I want MORE right wing idiots to realize they’re wrong and join our camp.

    I don't think she's a "right wing idiot" or that she's seriously joining anyone's camp. She's just an influencer trying to pull a new source of revenue.

    Okay, you were a huge idiot

    She was wrong, certainly. But the play - sucking up to right-wing oligarchs in hopes of a six or seven digit payday down the line - wasn't stupid. It was a calculated risk that failed to pay out.

    If we don’t we’ll make it harder for people to move out of the right wing camp, and I want muchuch less people in the right wing camp

    This isn't an issue of physical camps. She's not joining a military and putting on a uniform. She's fishing for dupes to send her money, because her old income streams have dried up.

    This is less "winning someone over to a camp" and more "trying to bribe an unreliable mercenary".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 98 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It’s sad she’s so close but still on ‘I want a middle ground on these issues’ really? Like…. She is okay with a little disrespect? A little discrimination?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    She is desperate for a place that she can be considered "one of the good ones" with the implicit idea of "there are bad ones and they deserve to be treated worse than the good ones". She doesn't understand that the world builds rules on foundational ideas that are just straw men dressed in stereotypes - no one bothers with distinction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Not my sister.

  • source
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    You don't move the Overton window in the direction you want by preemptively moderating yourself. You move it by taking a more extreme position perhaps even than you actually want, in order to normalize it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For those who are not familiar with Brianna Wu: She has tried to be a left-wing grifter, before she discovered that it got her nowhere and thus decided to be a right-wing grifter instead. She tried to the right-wing's "good trans woman", agreeing with everything they said, until the above message. And yeah, she is already trying to spin this yet again...

    And if you think that all of that is rather weird, she is also the creator of this masterpiece.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    The problem with compromising for a “middle ground” is that, when the right decide to re-litigate the issue (if they ever stop litigating to begin with), your starting position is now that middle ground. Compromising for a middle ground simply moves the Overton window to the right.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I just replied to another comment with this but I'll put it as a top level comment here because I think it's important.

    I want MORE right wing idiots to realize they're wrong and join our camp. The more the better. Remember, these people are still our neighbors, they still exist and we will have to interact with them outside our homes. I want more reasonable people, so when we do have converts, please receive them with open arms.

    Okay, you were a huge idiot, but welcome to sanity part 1. Of they're big enough to realize they were wrong (and they've had a LOT of brainwashing, it takes a lot for them to snap out of the crazy) we should be big enough to say bygones.

    I understand the want for revenge because they were "the enemy". I understand, they were a huge asshole and now we have to play nice with them? That doesn't sound fair! But I think we have to, we want to welcome more idiots into sanity and reason. The less idiots out there, the better. And for what it's worth, there are people that listen to her, if they can now be on the side of reason, they can pull a lot more people with them.

    If we don't we'll make it harder for people to move out of the right wing camp, and I want much much less people in the right wing camp

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Part of the problem is, this is not the first time this assault on minorities has happened; and many of the people who voted for Trump were previously thought of as allies who were reformed.

    We can even scare our own allies by “making nice” with villains. I remember hearing out a very betrayed voter whose core issue of dismay was hearing Gavin Newsom get cowed by Joe Rogan into saying supporting Trans people was a mistake.

    People like Joe Rogan have HURT them. I want you to picture having someone that ruined your life, and picture what it’s like to have them sleeping in your home, based on nothing more than “Hey, bud. We’re good now, right?”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Importantly there is an immediate follow up tweet,

    2/ I consider my business settled with all trans sisters. If anyone wants to reset things, unblock and move forward, I am happy to do that

    I'm glad she was able to admit she was wrong, that's absolutely a step in the right direction, but it's just a step. I don't want to speak of behalf of "trans sisters", but I certainly wouldn't consider the matter closed. She's apologized, great, but there is A LOT more work to be done.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ah, Brianna Wu. Theres a name Ive not heard in a while. Always looking to grift off something or other for her own gain. I wonder what she needs money for this time...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, I have been so dissappointed after her turn in the past few years. Like WTF was she even thinking was going to happen. These assholes are not ever going to be anything but assholes.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    i like how she’s still worried about "our extreme ideas"

    what extreme ideas??? that trans women should compete in women’s sports??? the extreme idea that trans women are women???

    i’d say my most extreme idea is that trans kids should be able to start HRT when they (and their cis peers) start puberty. and that’s only an extreme idea if you believe that trans kids are less deserving of a normal puberty than cis kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I realize this isn't exactly the point of the thread but you offered the opinion so I assume you're OK with expanding on it. If not that's alright too.

    How do you reconcile the ideas that children:

    1. Aren't mature enough to consent to sex
    2. Are mature enough to consent to permanently altering their bodies through HRT

    To be clear, this isn't meant to be an antagonistic question in any way. I haven't given much thought to the topic and it seems like you have so I am interested in hearing your perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    You're right. We should put all teenagers on puberty blockers until age 18. The high E or T spikes that occur with natal puberty dramatically change the body. And, we know that people absolutely can have puberty safely delayed for a long time. The AVERAGE age for girls to reach menarche was 17-18 before the industrial revolution. We actually have kids going through puberty at an age that is radically young by historical standards.

    So we should put all kids, cis or trans, on puberty blockers. That way we don't have to worry about a cis kid mistakenly starting transition, or a trans kid not realizing they're trans in time and having to go through a natal puberty. Everyone just puts off puberty until they're done with high school. As a bonus, no more teen pregnancy!

    /s

    But really, the answer to your question is that it's poorly framed. We do let children, well specifically teenagers, consent to sex. But, just like trans healthcare, we do it in very carefully controlled settings. Teenagers are going to have sex. That's something that is simply going to happen. So in sane places, we have kids go through sex education. We teach them safe sex practices and teach them on healthy relationship patterns. And we try to encourage any teens that do choose to be sexually active to use protection and get on birth control. Oh, and we legally regulate teen sex without trying to ban it. We pass Romeo and Juliet laws that try to thread the needle. You don't want 40 year olds sleeping with 12 year olds, but you also don't want to put a 15-year old on the sex offender registry for sleeping with their 14-year old classmate. You use your brain, don't fall for moral panics, and try to design systems that navigate a very complex ethical landscape.

    And really it's the same here. We're talking about people in the exact same age range - people 12-18. And we handle gender-affirming care for minors with a similar complexity and intelligence. We don't let 12 year old trans boys go on Amazon and order up vials of T shots. But we also don't infantilize trans kids either. We have them go through therapy and clinical assessment. We have clinical guidelines on what treatment is appropriate when. And most importantly, we don't fall for the naturalistic fallacy, which you have done. We recognize that just because something is natural does not mean it is good or desirable. Forcing a trans kid to go through a natal puberty is just as cruel and barbaric as dosing a cis kid with cross-sex hormones against their will. And we recognize that barbarity of telling 100 trans kids that they simply have to go through the trauma of natal puberty, just in case one of them happens to regret it later. In other words, we place equal value on the lives and well-being of cis kids and trans kids. You, however, seem to follow the rule of "it is acceptable for a hundred trans kids to suffer through Hell on Earth if it prevents one cis kid from mistakenly transitioning." You fundamentally do not place equal value on the lives of cis and trans people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It works the same way that children approach other invasive medical interventions. If there's great harm and a costly intervention, then child, parents, and doctors work to decide if the intervention is appropriate. As a nice black and white example, it would be unthinkable to avoid giving a young leukemia patient chemotherapy where necessary.

    Thus, the threat of harm has to be measured, and the danger of the treatment has to be measured. This happens. We understand that cases of gender dysphoria can cause real harm. These are only diagnosed when a child demonstrates a "persistent, insistent, and consistent" transgender identity. The doctors working with these children do the due diligence to ensure these are real cases with a strong need: the cases where we would be doing harm by failing to act.

    Puberty blockers, despite unwarranted infamy, are excellent for buying a little time to ensure the proper judgement. These do not usually have permanent consequences. Other HRT treatments can be applied when we have high confidence that they are preventing harm. Again, that's pretty much like any other invasive pediatric treatment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Underage sex and HRT are not really comparable.

    That said I advocate for puberty blockers rather than HRT for adolescents myself. That allows them to safely postpone their decision if they are unsure and lets them decide when they are adults.

    I'm not a doctor though, it's best to ask an endocrinologist (I think) to determine what's best for a child.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Some people need to learn about the alt-right’s cultivated ignorance via hard experience.

    The rest of us work just fine via observation.

    “Meet me halfway”, says the unreasonable man.

    You take one step forward, and they take one step backwards.

    “Why can’t you meet me halfway?”, complains the unreasonable man.

    And thus, conservatism in a nutshell.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Better late than never but bitch we ALL warned you

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Here is what you should do, Brianna:

    Delete your twitter and never post about trans issues again. When you have been so consistently wrong about about something for such a long time, it is the best thing for everyone to simply accept that you shouldn't be part of the conversation anymore rather than trying to claw your way back into it.

    (I know she isn't actually reading.)

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I feel like I'd rather die for having to much faith in humanity than too little. And on that metric, I can't help but think BriannaWu was doing something right approaching right-wing nutjobs the way she did.

    But more importantly, I'd rather not die in either of the aforementioned ways. What she did was definitely done out of (perhaps admirable) naïveté. And she's clearly grown as a person from the experience.

    All that said, I don't know that she's got the best positions on everything. She says she believes that "trans women don't belong in women's sports" and she wants a "middle ground on bathrooms", both of which seem... problematic (even if the right wing wasn't so maximalist and radical about things.) And that part makes me wonder if the rest of the tweet was made in good faith, honestly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Naaaah, she was throwing around the Cass Review last I checked (a year ago). This wasn't a virtuous arbitration between two differently informed parties. She's always done reactionary politicking and shouted "lalala cant hear you" whenever forced to break bread with mainstream trans advocacy.

    Cheers to her if she's opened her eyes a bit, but I'm not holding my breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Even if it is, she needs to sit her ass down and talk to other trans people irl. Like, this is terminally ill online brainrot and it's internet famous brainrot. Ms Wu needs therapy, she needs to go to a day of remembrance ceremony, and she needs to delete Twitter.

    She comes to us as a sister again, but she still ain't treating us as one. We don't call each other family because it's some quirky thing, we do it because our community is filled with people who lost our families over this, where people we know will be buried with the wrong name. So yeah, she's my sister, but I don't think she thinks of us as such and I think she's been very out of touch with us for a long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Progressives have given so much ground that their encampment is on middle-ground.

  • source
  • Fuck the middleground.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Genuinely surprised this was not in Leopards Ate My Face

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Someone lived under a rock.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I don’t think she’s right wing. Maybe in the same way that I jokingly call people right wing when they’re wrong, but I don’t think she’s actually traitor lunatic.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    The fact that this is dated Nov 1st... How the hell could it take you this long to figure it out??

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I remember a long time ago someone told me “you can’t reason with crazy.” These people are living in a completely unrealistic universe and do not have their wits about them. You can call them evil or whatever, but even so, they should be getting help from a medical professional because whatever is going on with these people is completely toxic, unhealthy, and destructive, even for themselves. I’ve pretty much written off anyone who still supports this administration a couple of years ago, as any reasonable person has already abandoned Trump and anyone else he associates with.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Oh… I know… I’ll walk through the chainsaw robot cave… they are triggered by motion… they tear anything that moves to shreds… yeah, that’s where I’m going to walk…

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I honestly don't understand how you can be conservative LGBTQ+. You existence is progressive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›