all 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 1 year ago

We're getting neither .... we're getting this instead ...

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, that's not what we're getting. Say what you will about the Terran Confederation, at least they built a space empire under a unified common goal. At least those humans were outrageously evil.

    Instead, what we're getting is this:

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That map projection though

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    I might be mistaken but I think that the comparison is wrong. Starfleet and the federation are not the same.

    We want the federation and we are getting the terrain empire.

    We want starfleet and we are getting space force

  • source
  • I mean, looking on the bright side: Even the Federation universe had to go through two civil wars, World War III, and the eugenics war to get to where they ended up.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Yep, were stuck with this shitty timeline

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    I mean, the Star Trek timeline was incredibly shitty for humans up until it wasn’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    True. But eventually human empathy succeeded. Call me pessimistic -- the barista sure likes to -- but I just don't see that happening for this timeline!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    We have to go through at least two major conflicts first, ww3 and the eugenics wars, according to trek.

    At least we are on track for those i suppose 🀧

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Didn’t we go through it already like, last week?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    No, that was the Bell Riots. WWIII is scheduled to start in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Did you see the gallery at the trial in Encounter at Farpoint? Mid-21st humanity seems right on track for Star Trek future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Call me pessimistic -- the barista sure likes to

    Highpoint of Hawkgirl's day, in fact!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Nah, that's Hawkman. Ben Aflac is Duckman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    WTF is a Hawkman? Isn't that Billy Chrystal in that movie Birdman?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nah, a Hawkman is a semi-immortal Egyptian who keeps getting reincarnated only to be murdered by the same jerk again and again for thousands of years.

    Also: the worst character of the main ones in Legends of Tomorrow

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    That sounds kind of interesting! Is it a series or movie saga?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's their origin story according to Legends of Tomorrow, an ensemble DC Comics show where the aforementioned hawk people are on the team. There's also time travel!

    It doesn't feature the best writing or acting ever, but it's pretty fun if you're into that kind of thing 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Strange that the Space Force logo is a combination of both…

    Not sure how they can just steal the Star Trek logo tho…

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The original NASA logo was the inspiration for the star trek insignia.

    So really this is more like a nod to a nodder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That reminds me, does anyone know where I could get an agonizer repaired for cheap?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • what we wanted:

    what we got:

    i will weep for the futures lost, but i will not weep for getting mirror kira

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We don't know that yet. First we have to go through the nuclear war before we can get to Starfleet. We're speed running it now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Shouldn't the Eugenics Wars have already happened?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    *squinting*

    We're getting the Might and Magic devs? Is that why Q was a secret boss in MM6?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's ok. It just means we can cross over to the brighter side.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    You say that, but we seem to be at least on track to a better 2050 than they had.

    We've not had a eugenics war, drug-controlled supersoldiers, nuclear conflagration, nor a mutant genocide campaign, and we may not get the second and fourth.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah in the Star Trek universe they praised Elon Musk

    Guess we have already split off from that timeline. Unless of course the fascists will rewrite history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I feel like people overblow the Elon Musk reference. Even putting aside the plot twist, it's been nearly 200 years from now, and they had the whole nuclear apocalypse in the early 2000s, which would only further muddle things.

    People today praise Thomas Edison, and he was not that much better in many respects.

    It's entirely reasonable for someone in the 23rd century to lose some of the details that we might have today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    What we wanted

    What we're getting

    I guess the silver lining is we'll kill ourselves off before we ever make it off the planet to spread our violence elsewhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    The word Utopia translates to "No place".

    There is no such thing as a utopia. The point of stories about utopias is just to get people to think about how to improve things. Not to make people upset they aren't living in a place that can never exist.

    The world presented by Star Trek isn't telling you how things should be, how could it? It's wildly inconsistent about how things work, like do they have money or not? It seems it's just conveying they have an ideal future economy, but since the writers don't know what that will be, it's deliberately vague.

    The point is to show various problems we have today from the perspective of people in a better future so we can understand that our problems as solvable and motivate us to solve them.

    If you're giving up on solving the problems we have today because they seem impossible to solve or you believe they should magically solve themselves, then you're missing the point of Star Trek.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Swords in space??

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Starfleet command now that's a cool name for your space agency

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What does that mean? What's the second icon?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Even Roddenberry knew by the end that his dream wasnt possible. Humans aren’t that good and altruistic, we are conquerors

  • source