top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The ceo makes $96.5 million a year. Where’s the “accountability margins” when that was decided? These companies and their decisions really show how stupid the stock market really is. At least that’s the way I see it being uneducated from the outside

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The ceo makes $96.5 million a year.

    This should be severely punishable by the law. It causes more societal harm than many crimes with serious penalties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Cap executive pay at 12x the lowest paid employee in the company. You can't make more in one month than the drones make in a year. If you want a raise make sure everyone else gets one too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can't wait to see the exemption for "part time workers" and suddenly everyone making less than a triple digit salary has exactly 32 hours a week, or whatever is legally permissible to pass as "part time work" in your country.

    You've provided a fantastic common-sense solution designed off the simple premise that no one needs 12x of a living wage, and I can't agree enough, but I know the capitalists would fuck it up at every stage possible, while simultaneously arguing that they're justified in doing so because the method of economy that they worships has given them moral purchase to look down on the poors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Make it 12x the lowest paid by hourly rate. Then maybe it’s 32 hours, or less, but you’ll be paid no more than 12x less than the highest paid employee on an hourly basis.

    Also, the hourly wage should include all compensation, including benefits and stock options, so they don’t try to stuff their benefit and stock packages (eg private plane and company car).

    Also, tax all wealth above 20x the median wealth of the nearest 100,000 people at 90%.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    In support of the move in spirit, but: Any ideas to prevent a company from circumventing this via dummying up contractor firms? Eg, “We employ this software company started by our founder to write our code. Coincidentally, their pay is .1% of the pay at Microsoft”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Like any proposal you would have to word it in a way that minimizes loopholes initially, as well as muster the political will to close any new loopholes that come up.

    Off the top of my head, you would probably want to use averages in some way. Perhaps use the median income of the bottom 20% of domestic wage earners in a given company, with some sort of multiplier or additional penalty for offshore employees. You would also want to ensure all forms of executive compensation like bonuses and stock options are included in the equation.

    There's probably more you would need to include but those 3 things would minimize the most obvious loopholes I can see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They are asking the impossible. If they refuse to take any risks on new titles they will not have breakout hits like they are wanting. They have enough studios that you can have some stinker releases that get offset by the surprise hits.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Ah the gamers will pay for the AI data centers!

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    We made decisions that have absolutely decimated the value of our brand. Now go make money from the ashes!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Soooooo they've crippled their game making divisions with layoffs that obliterated employee morale so that they had more money to throw at AI, and now they're demanding that this same section of the company offset even more of their AI costs because it's one of the few parts of the company that actually makes money?

    Reminds me of how Hasbro is milking WotC for all they're worth while destroying faith in the brand.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    makes me wonder if the acquisitions were just a win/win strategy - acquire all these studios, milk them with unreasonable demands, cut the workforces constantly, then close up the studio but keep all the ip.

    because that's how it's fucking going

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Xbox division: making money

    Microsoft execs:

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    lol MS customers are going to get screwed. They’re making Sony and Nintendo look pro-consumer.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    just kill xbox already man

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Let the enshittification commence!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's gonna be hard, hell I won't even unpack my X, it's not worth playing

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Number must go up!

  • source