all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago*

Oh, FLAT hub!

  • source
  • [–] 140 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's just me distro hopping sorry guys

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    surprisingly russia is at 5th.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Linux has always had a strong showing over there. If I had the misfortune of living there I'd certainly want all the privacy and autonomy I could get...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Speaking of countries, I'm surprised that China isn't in the top 10, especially considering their efforts to reduce reliance on US tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They likely have their own homegrown alternatives, you think Xi the Poo would allow such corruption of his people by giving them access to corrupting capitalist software such as non approved encrypted messaging services?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    And it's not like it didn't have a reason. A lot of closed "capitalist" software has been seen in not very good and honest actions. And the penalties for this were very light. Yes open source mostly is a different story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I'm sure the authoritarian dictator is being benevolent and looking out for the good of his people when building the firewall and locking down the internet.

    Don't be a fool. Just because you can point to closed sourced bad actors doesn't mean it was done for anything less than control.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    honestly surprised more than half of the apps on Flathub are verified! I expected it to be less

    back before the redesign, it felt like most apps had "note: this wrapper is not made by, or affiliated with the original developers" somewhere

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How does flatpak make money? I feel like I should be paying for the bandwidth im using since it can't be cheap.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago*

    They don't. They have a CDN sponsor.

    Flathub wouldn't be possible without the generous support of the following organizations and individuals. Organizations & Infrastructure

    • Codethink
    • Cloud Native Computing Foundation
    • Fastly
    • Mythic Beasts
    • Prerender.io
    • Scaleway
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Cool! It's the main way I install GUI apps now.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I'm doing my part.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    I don't like Flatpaks, but I guess this is better than nothing.

    I'm surprised China doesn't have a lot. Are they not using Flathub, or perhaps Flatpaks?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    I don't like flatpaks or snaps or anything like it either, but I think they help a lot in situations like the Steam Deck or PinePhone where you want the base to be able to move slowly and be stable, while letting the apps on top move quickly.

    The problems with flatpaks and similar is that it allows and even encourages developers to stick with horrendously outdated libraries, and your system is only as safe as the container's isolation defenses.

    They also make it more difficult to go in and directly modify or tweak the program as the user.

    And many developers are no longer offering bare-metal options.

  • source
  • parent
  • Looks like Java finally has company in the exclusive 3 billion club

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post

    Using a monochrome colorscale with no reference to what zero is. This map is atrocious. Germany has half as many downloads as the US, but it barely stands out against the background.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I’m very, very late to the party. Why is Flatpak the latest shit? What’s wrong with the classic *.deb viz. *.rpm distribution?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It fulfills a different purpose than system packages. First, it can be run without privileges/system modification, so it works on immutable distributions. Second, it doesn't share libraries between apps (with some exceptions) or the system, so you don't have to package separately for each. It essentially takes some of the container philosophy/tech and brings it to desktop apps. This also gives it some ability to do some sandboxing that isn't as easy with system installed apps.

    This approach comes with some downsides. Particularly larger storage requirement for apps, sometimes less integration with the system, and lack of ability for apps to easily call/interact each other unless they're packaged together.

    It's meant for complete GUI apps and not small tools/packages that are the standard in system package managers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments