Interesting, could be because it can expose kids to sex, incest and violence (via the bible stories)
post
Yes, most religious content is not appropriate to discuss at work. As it should be
I've never read the quran but the bible is absolutely nsfw and anyone who disagrees hadn't read the damned thing
...so then these sisters get super horny, get their elderly father drunk, and repeatedly rape him until they get pregnant and give birth to their own brothers.
It's the holiest of books.
Its kind of funny, but if thats the threshold for NSFW then basically any fediverse or wiki app on F-Droid needs to be marked as NSFW...
Maybe add an antifeature for "cult content" :D
Probably does. That being said most fediverse and Wikipedia do not feature stories of young teens getting their father drunk to pass on the genes after seeing their mother turned to salt because some angels got lost in rapesville.
Wikipedia has literally anything you can imagine on it, so of course it does have that. Just the article about the bible itself probably contains all the fucked up things that appear in the bible.
And the fediverse has every kind of porn from incest to zoophilia on it.
That's bullshit. Other atheists can be so fucking stupid when the Bible is brought up. Can't ever discuss it because it's fiction even though we can write 1000 page essays on Bloodborne lore. Shakespeare is a bunch of people putting humanity into some stories and we appreciate that but because morons created religion that means the Bible is useless.
And the "Bible has rape, obviously it's bad, duh!!" shit. Just change it to "LGBT book has rape, ban it!" and join your people. What's the point of leaving religion when you're so dogmatic? You're literally built to be a crusader. Posers.
The difference is in the endorsement of horrible behaviour. So, if the same horrible things were encouraged in an LGBTQ+ book, I would expect it to get the same response as what the bible is getting.
Endorsement? Or depictions?
It's historical fiction. The Bible predates religion: straight from the cult era. Christians, Muslims, and Jews are just dingle berries stuck to our cultural relics. These books belong to secular people. And since when are secular people using this stuff to promote rape?
For that reason, plus being against such puritan attitudes toward content, is why I think censoring this stuff is bullshit.
People are going to stoop to hyper literal interpretations of a NSFW label and ignore the subject of cens*rsh*p... Because religious people suck? I get it, but this is our shit. Fuck what they say or think about our fiction.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I also don't think the bible should be censored. It's just that the bible does endorse bad behaviour, such as how to treat slaves (and thus owning slaves). It is not just a piece of fiction that nobody believes in, and it wasn't written by people who just wanted to entertain their friends. A lot of the bible is about morality.
The alternative is having an exemption for religious texts. If the Bible was judged by the standards of secular literature, it would not be made available to children.
The alternative is having an exemption for religious texts.
People would protest this by claiming 50 shades is their religious text or something
Have you actually read the bible? If anyone takes tagging for sex, crime, and violence seriously, of course they will block the bible. Just because your pastor skips the offending parts does not mean they don't exist. Same applies to the Quran.
No religious text should ever be taught to any child.
This is an insult to erotic literature. The Bible has an automatic censor built in. It's boring as fuck to actually read it. No one reads that shit.
Blatant targeting whether you like the Bible or not lololol
Based on what? Religious smut and violence should be treated the same as non-religious smut and violence.
Why aren't the violent games marked NSFW?
What violent games are on f-droid?
Thank you for reaponding with specific claims. Others have already addressed the technicals (the packages themselves don't include NSFW offending material, they are merely engines or interfaces), but I thought I would point out that in American workplaces talking about violence is absolutely commonplace, as it is in the rest of the prevailing culture surrounding us.
It's absolutely common for people to be descriptive about the violence they see in entertainment, or to discuss violent real world matters.
Even if you set aside the critique of violence espoused in the Christian Bible, there is a mountain of adult themes and sexually explicit abuses which our categorically not safe for work in most places.
Doom/quake clones and spin-offs, plenty of war games, Pokemon clones, generic shooters.
The doom 'game' idTech4a++ is actually only a game engine that you have to provide the Doom/wolf/etc game files for if you want to use. Therefore, the engine itself is not NSFW. The pokemon 'game' I see is 'Pokeverse' which is a deckbuilder/trainer app that just accesses an API online to access that data. Not NSFW. I don't see how Pokemon would be NSFW anyway.
Got any actual concrete examples because I'm seeing nothing that would fall in the bounds of NSFW?
top 14 comments