top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 1 year ago

It was an abusive exwife in my case, but yes. It's abuse all the same. It does the same thing.

It isolates, it breaks you down, it makes you forget who you were, and then when you least expect it, they are no longer dependable for anything and you have nothing left.

And they feel nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yup, that's why tate sold the worst dating advice in the world while being a sex trafficker, ensuring repeat business.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Study on men who are chronically single showed the common denominator: having extremely low confidence. Now that I think about it, this post corroborates the target profile of negging by abusers-- victims who have low self-esteem.

    There are, for the lack of a better word, not so good looking men or short men having relationships, in one form or another, with ridiculously good looking women because these men have confidence without being too bragadacious. Of course, there are shallow women who go for looks alone (same as men), but there are just as many kind-hearted and less shallow women who prefer men with personality over looks and vice versa.

    Low confidence and self-critical thoughts are what impedes chronically single men. Sometimes, it is indeed on the state of mind. And this vulnerability of lonely men is exploited by manosphere to create incels. I don't have a solution to address the problem but this is a general observation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    yea, incelism is all about blaming women for all thier inadquecies, the reason they dont have a job, or they not tall, or they dont have large dong. or they are not hot. they could be looking the wrong places, if a psychopath can have a SO, so can "incels"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    This is essentially cult tactics, yeah. As much as I loathe incels... Some of them genuinely need help.

    The ones who are in too deep to literally start calling women "foids" tho? Throw them in the woodchipper. Dick first.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ive never heard that term before. I'm guessing it's some sort of shortening of "femoid" (a word I believe to have made up right now, but can imagine incels using regularly)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yes, that's literally a shortening of that, and "femoid" was a word they DID use constantly. And then they shortened it further to disguise it more, I guess. I'm sorry you had to find it out this way :|

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    they are so chickenshit they cant even admit they are woman haters, aka mysogynists. they dont like being called out being a mysogynist, so they disguise it as something else, like blaming them for causing thier own problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Isn't this basically what religion does, as well?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 1 year ago

    Some religions.

    At-will employment too.

    "You're nothing special - easily replaceable. I'm doing you a favour by letting you have this job."

    Basically anywhere where a power imbalance is an intended feature, not a necessary evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Some religions do, yes, and it works, which is why they do it. The important thing is to identify these behaviors and find social groups that will empower you instead of disempowering you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Unfortunately, humanity is better at making people feel small than building them up. And the folks who succumb to this are likely already in a compromised state so it will be hard, if not impossible, for them to pull themselves out alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    5'8" (1.73m) here. Married for 13 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A touch shorter and celebrated 24 years married last month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've seen 5'2" guys who are regularly seeing incredibly attractive women.

    I also know a guy whose face is not what one would call conventionally attractive but his personality means he's often had his pick of men and women because he just feels good to spend time with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    even 5ft men can get with girls. girls can detect thirsty desperate , creepy men(nice guys) very easily. i had unfortunate experience of hearing and watching my olders bro pickup videos he always binged on. they all sound desperate and creepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Women always had height requirements, you just started seeing them written down.

    Online dating certainly brought some new problems, but most women hate it too so if it doesn't work for you the old staples of finding a partner through friends, a hobby or at work are still there, as well as specific dating activities.

    Or just don't put your height in your bio and be funny. Those "non negotiable height requirements" turn out to be very negotiable in a lot of cases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    if men have requirements of woman, its only fair for women to have standards and requirements of thier own. its not a one way relationship, that only breeds toxicity, and women not dating you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I hope you find someone for you soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Look at the username. You are falling for bait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    1. Stop lying. No you don't. You look like a Baptist saying he loves Jesus. Just who are you trying to fool? Whose brownie points do you think you're earning?

    2. I don't. I haven't tried looking for a date since the pandemic and I don't plan to start again. Women don't want me, they want the quarter million dollars of real estate I own and the 2 million dollars of real estate I'm heir to. Well guess what? Unlike the majority of married men, I'm not losing my home in a divorce. I'm gonna die right there on my grandfather's land on my grandfather's couch and my three month rotted corpse will be found by police on a wellness check initiated by the town water company. I'm not gonna be taken to the hospital, forced to keep my heart beating after the stroke and live to be an 86 year old shambling corpse of a social security check for others to cash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Podcast episode #120 (Invicil) from Reply All should be required listening in this day and age.

    Invicil: How a shy, queer Canadian woman accidentally invented one of the internet’s most toxic male communities.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    this post brings up some good points, but I want to be clear that turning men into women hating incels who will die alone is the GOAL of all this rhetoric. it doesn't have to be that way.

    if your reaction to this post is "women bad" you should take a step back and realize they've already gotten you to take the first step down the pipeline.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    so many comments claiming this post blames or makes fun of men and incels that i went back and reread the whole thing... what the fuck are the lot of you even responding to‽ there's nothing like that in the post, and on the contrary it says men are victimized by this. Jesus, some of you are really willing to take anything as a slight. beats self reflection i guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    it doesn't blame men

    Is your point that manosphere is not "men" but... Idk, a subspecies of a very aggressive and mean bear?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    manosphere refers to the online cult created by influencers like Rogan, Tate, etc.

    you're literally doing the "if you criticize Israel you're antisemitic" bullshit for manosphere and misandry instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (9 children)

    It doesn't blame men, except those specific men and all the men who listened or fell for them

    Is that your point?

    (I'm going to ignore your personal attacks.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    please point to the personal attack in my comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    you’re literally doing the “if you criticize Israel you’re antisemitic” bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    calling out your bullshit is not a personal attack. a personal attack is an attack on someone's person, not their actions. i commented on your actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    If that were true, you wouldn't be trying to derail that conversation but you'd got back to what exactly is your point here? Because I called your point bullshit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    ... what? you're the one who doesn't even know what a personal insult is, let alone understand my point. i didn't bring the conversation there. you did.

    my point is clear and was made already, no matter how badly you want to interpret it in a way that makes you feel persecuted. no one blamed "men" for the loneliness epidemic. they blamed the cult that preys on men. it's literally a post about men being victims to the manosphere. the fact that you take offense to what's directed at the sex criminal Tator or the grifter piece of shit Rogan personally tells more about you than me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And pray tell me where did I

    the fact that you take offense to what’s directed at the sex criminal Tator or the grifter piece of shit Rogan personally tells more about you than me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It doesn't blame men, except those specific men and all the men who listened or fell for them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Manosphere being a toxic shitshow of harmful beliefs and self-sabotag is nothing new.

    But in 1 way, it is very different to an abusive boyfriend. The abusive bf doesn't necessarily start off being abusive or not as obviously so. The bf adapts to you and slowly undermines your confidence. The manosphere has it in their advertising material. The people fall for the manosphere are not slowly manipulated and abused by the manosphere. The manosphere is the new abusive boyfriend after the breakup with the last abuser. When the abuse already has been normalised and kinda wanted because at least it is "familiar".

    So what is the first "abusive boyfriend"?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    So what is the first “abusive boyfriend”?

    For me it was high school. Constantly being treated like shit by my peers for being weird and quiet really fucked me up. Fortunately things got better in college and I didn't fall into the manosphere crap but I very easily could have had I not found people to give me a break and help me learn to act more "normal" without being abusive towards me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    From what I could witness, most likely the "first abuser" is most likely a close family member, either the (step-)father or some uncle or grandfather - people who themselves believe in such values they call "traditional".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Yeah, but also (step-)mother or some aunt or grandmother, maybe even girlfriend. Not only men are pushing these "traditional" values.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    maybe in a ultra conservative household. but more than not its the man of the house that influences the male children more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    In my life, I made a very different experience.

    And I believe:

    Sexist beliefs, traditions and norms are not only held up by men and ultra conservative women. We all do it together and as long as we act that we don't do it as a collective, we will continue to fail young man and women and turn more people into toxic sexist idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Eh, I agree and disagree with the image text. There are similarities, yes, but I wouldn't view it quite as closely connected as the post implies. Main reason being that there's a difference between using verbal abuse to control someone's actions -- like what it implies an abusive boyfriend would do to control his gf -- and using generally third party reference points to construct an admittedly grim world view for a broad demographic group. The manosphere approach is closer, I'd say, to the marketing done by the women's beauty industry in this regard.

    Ie. there are certain trends / norms that women tend to cycle through, and certain beauty standards that people generally seem to expect from women (without digging in to that!). The beauty industry leverages that and puts out products re-enforcing those norms / helping ppl align to those norms. There are lots of people that find alternative body types attractive, and/or that have more realistic expectations. But if you're a woman who's obsessed with beauty trends, it can become an unhealthy obsession leading to potential issues like anorexia.

    In that it's toxic when taken to an extreme, and in that its fundamentals are based in "reality", the beauty industry's similar to manosphere rhetoric. The manosphere's "short guys get no girls" mentality is backed by many short guys experiences with dating (especially online, where they're pre-filtered!); similarly, a fat girl with lopsided facial features will have difficulty, making the beauty industries products/message more enticing/convincing. They both leverage the generally negative real world experiences of their target audiences to 'ground' their message. Both movements also have equatable super stars -- "Supermodels"/OnlyFans girls/Twitch Streamers/Whatever who are deemed the most beautiful women, and "Tech bros" who are fathering armies of children and touting right wing eugenics-like ideals.

    Mostly pointing this alternative comparison out, because I think there's a bit of grey on the manosphere stuff. An obsession with beauty standards/industry stuff is unhealthy, but in moderation its ok/beneficial; an obsession with "men's rights"/"men's issues" is unhealthy, but in moderation it's likely a good thing. More guys being more conscious about their health, and getting more exercise, isn't a bad thing after all -- and that's one of the themes in that manosphere clusterfuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Kinda reminds me of boot camp, using psychological attacks to break down men's will and have him disregulated and complient

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    be 5' 7"

    not attractive to most women (aww)

    every airplane seat feels like first class

    live longer on average (aww)

    workout once a week and look buff

    no car is too small

    sleep like a king in beds of any size

    women generally trust you more easily cos your presence is non-threatening

    You know it's not that bad of a trade. Y'all sixfooters have fun with the girls.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I'm not quite 5'8, and I was in the Marines, where obviously size was made to be something, especially in the infantry, but I always used to just tell dudes that I'm harder to shoot, and in the unlikely event they get me before you, I'm easier to carry to safety. Fucking win-win as far as I'm concerned.

    And with those days long behind me, and married with a short wife and hort kids of my own, I'm the biggest thing in the world to them. So just find an equally short person to spend your life with. Or don't, nothing matter!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's true. Women trust me partially because...wtf am I going to do to them? Sit on her head? Bite her ankles? So, I'm one of the only two being driven by my co-worker nowadays. Bonus points for having given up on relationships, because even if I was in the mood for those, I don't have time for no personal life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [+] 8 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    "Incel losers" commits a horrific crime because they were treated like they have no worth and deserve to die

    What makes you think that was why a particular crime was committed? There are lots and lots of people who get bullied and are treated like shit and they don't act out in some horrible, violent way.

    I think it's these communities that they're in that encourage that kind of behavior. We need better support structures for our society so that people who need community can find something healthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    A part that complicates things is that incels, contrary to what the name implies, choose to be incels. Also, working with incels specifically could end up giving a perverse incentive (or whatever it's called when an effort to reduce something instead becomes an incentive to increase it) to be an incel to get help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I realize you're probably just making a joke but the reality is that there are few people so ugly that no one would have sex with them. Even if you keep your standards high, I'm sure there's many cases of someone whose own mother would cry at the sight of that managed attract a model who is just into that.

    But the attitude is very off-putting, more so than whatever physical characteristics they think disqualifies them from love or sex (and a good number of them aren't even unattractive but just have no self-esteem and hate themselves so much they either can't believe someone else would like them or that someone who does must have big problems of their own or is lying to use them).

    Even the niceguy attitude is offputting, and the incel attitude is pretty much that but replace the sadness with anger and the depression with rage, and add a bunch of BS masquerading as the science of attraction that proves they aren't attractive and ignores that it's subjective and that there's this weird "so ugly it's cute" category that some/many people seem to have (though it usually applies to animals rather than people).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is the Just World Fallacy. Saying "You can't get laid because you have a bad attitude" isn't any different from saying "The reason why you're homeless is because of your bad attitude."

    Okay. Does that help at all? Abso-fucking-lutely not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I disagree that it's unhelpful. I'll agree that it's not an easy thing like "just smile more, you'll get laid!" But step 1 for any incel to actually get laid would be to stop being a fucking incel and recognize that no one owes them sex, affection, or even a moment of their time to hear them out or explain why they won't.

    If you choose to wallow in something, whether it be inceldom or depression, you're going to find it very difficult or impossible to come out of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Incels sound like a toxic cult, and I'm not sure how much you can blame people for getting indoctrinated into a cult.

    Depression is a disease which is treated with medication and therapy, so I don't see that as similar at all.

    What I find interesting is that most people try to counter this with "Just do this, and then maybe you'll get laid", instead of pointing out how self-centered the entire concept is in the first place.

    But step 1 for any incel to actually get laid would be to stop being a fucking incel and recognize that no one owes them sex, affection, or even a moment of their time to hear them out or explain why they won't.

    No, that is not step 1 for actually getting laid, because there is no step 1 for that. Some people are doomed to be alone and miserable, and for some of them, that's never going to change. That's just how it is. I wish we'd built a better society which actually takes care of people, but that isn't the one we live in. I just do my best to try to make things better.

    What we really need is legalized sex work, but there'd have to be protections for the workers so they wouldn't have to worry about being abused by their clientele. Legalized sex work with strong sex workers' unions would be ideal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well, you choose whether or not to identify as an incel. Which is what you mean, I assume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, inceldom is a mindset, choosing to be bitter about their state of affairs and lash out at others for not wanting them. I don't frequent their areas, but some of them blame various ratios of their facial positioning when their face is fine, it's just their attitude that is shitty.

    I guess it could be argued how much one can change their personality to be less off-putting, but I've known some real ugly dudes that have had fine dating lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    37 comments in c/mentalhealth@lemmy.world view that post