I get it. I think it would have been more convincing if they pulled headlines from the same sources for the left and the right columns.

I get the message but like these are just different news media.

If they want to have an effective message they should gather the same before and after from the same sites.

I guarantee the new york post never wrote a fawning article about this girl in the first place.

This screenshot is stupid as fuck. You're comparing The New Yorker and The Guardian to Forbes and the New York Post, and presenting that as evidence of some grand conspiracy? At least try...

And to be clear, Forbes and the New York Post are absolutely not "pro-climate change" unless that means "let's keep making climate change worse."

Should've had comments from the same sites. Would make the point better.

She got on a boat to bring food to people in a country that isn't iarael

While I'm not saying that it's not true, wouldn't you use the same companies in both columns?

Look how the pro-climate change media

The what now ?

Eh, they are saying more about themselves than they are about Greta.

Fuck genocide apologists.

Getting named "Antisemite of the week" by another genocide supporting advocacy group? Wear it with pride, girl!

You must have a short memory. There was a lot of "Greta bad" stories when she was first getting on the scene, many from the same outlets you cite on the left this time.

Lots of conservative usernames in the comments. Get tagging

Syrian Girl became famous for simping for Assad.

I'm sorry, but even despite everything that's happening, calling Israel the real enemy of humanity is suspect as fuck to me.

Dawg get this nazi hasbaroid out of my feed go away blocked lmao