Possibly the same way Fallout Boy and System of a down can be grouped. There is a phenomenon in music 'similarity' systems (remember Pandora?) that, because the process of actually analyzing music and classifying it is work, tries to offload the work to elsewhere, and often what really happens is things get grouped not by qualitative similarities like mood, rhythmic complexity, tone etc. but by the quantitative and easy 'these two were liked by the same group of people, aged X~Y, so they must be similar.'
post
U2 is considered grunge for the same reason Black Sabbath is considered reggae.
I've never heard of or seen that.
The only thing U2 has in common with grunge is that both were popular in roughly the same time period (give or take 5 years or so).
Yeah if U2 is grunge based on time period, then Motley Crue and Michael Jackson is grunge.
Don't forget about the grunge artists Dire Straights, Phil Collins, MC Hammer and Whitney Houston...
I would be more okay hearing Motley Crue on such a playlist than the other two, tbh.
I’m starting to think you don’t understand how to identify grunge music.
I'm not saying it fits, just that it would be less jarring.
Who the fuck considers U2 to be grunge? Kenny G?
Prob U2.
"Look at us kids, were cool grunge music just like that Nirvana band on the shirt you're wearing!"
Some people thought that the band was somewhat Edge-y?
Bono you didn't!
I'm Mullen over whether to take part in this punathon.
They have never been considered grunge by anybody. They released the album Achtung Baby in 1991, which recieved much critical acclaim, but so did a lot of other non-grunge bands. Just because a band released popular music in the early 1990s, doesn't mean they are grunge.
I have never heard of U2 being considered Grunge. If anything they were Pop.
They first broke during the New Wave era, and were considered one of the quintessential New Wave superstars, along with The Cars, Talking Heads, Duran Duran, Flock of Seagulls, etc.
Eh. I'd give them Alternative Rock. The thing that would likely classify them as pop is that they were so famous for a part of their career.
They’re not. They’re basically the one band out of the Echo & The Bunnymen, Teardrop Explodes, Flock Of Seagulls mini-genre that really broke into the mainstream.
They are absolutely not and I find it sus you make this bizarre claim without providing a single example.
Link and shame them. I will fight every one of their authors in a 1v1 dual to the death
in Helldivers 2
Genre identifiers are mostly nonsense anyway. U2 have been many things over the years. 'Boy' is a very different album from 'Zootopia'.
Also, how the fuck are Biffy Clyro always in metal magazines, on Kerrang TV, and at metal festivals? They’re basically the same thing as Idlewild. Is it because the singer got a tattoo?
I'm sorry, what??? I'm just as perplexed as you are, where are you seeing this and can you drop a link?
top 46 comments