all 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Benny Safdie doesn't make box-office-numbers kinds of movies.

Besides, Johnson's producing it. It's his money. He wanted Oscar bait and got Oscar bait.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, from what I've seen it looks great, it's just not a blockbuster or even trying to be one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Looked cringe to me. Throwing on a wig doesn’t automatically make you a “serious actor”. And a bad wig at that. Like someone else said, the whole thing reeks of Oscar bait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    If Dewayne gets an Oscar then the whole thing is a sham.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Hollywood running its own rewards shows has always been the Obama putting a medal on Obama meme...

    In fact, rewards ceremonies for most things are nothing but BS. Very, very few are actual rewards that seriously considered all applicable content, and even fewer serve a purpose beyond ego inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think it's more about increasing perceived value. I've definitely seen professionals literally just paying for awards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Oh, perceived value... I guess that would be the outward side of ego for individuals like celebs. lol Only so many careers where those two can go hand in hand. (although under very much NOT meritocratic capitalism, ego goes a lot further than it should...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I didn't even hear about this one

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I saw something for it somewhere once and it seemed interesting until the title came up, then I was given the impression it'll be lame and never thought about it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Based on the 2002 documentary The Smashing Machine: The Life and Times of Extreme Fighter Mark Kerr

    They should have included the subtitle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Aaay. That would've made a lot more sense.

    With no context, the impression I got was like watching a brief trailer for Sully, except Tom Hanks has a reputation for things like Fast and Furious, and the trailer ends with, "Redemption Most Fowl, in cinemas blah blah..."

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Think of the niche market that an MMA sports movie is appealing to

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Johnson's not even MMA. His claim to fame is wrestling. The goofy older brother of MMA lets you abuse steroids until you're a giant muscle balloon just to lose to a guy called "The Transphobic Tickler"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That’s what I mean.. the movie is about MMA. I don’t have any particular interest in MMA, and I am sure lots of people out there like me might watching a boxing movie but don’t care about MMA. Anyway, just seems a very niche movie with a limited audience to be whinging about box office

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Saw it this weekend. The acting was good, but the movie in general was boring and anticlimactic. Definitely a snoozer.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The fact that you saw it after seeing clips makes me question your ability to reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The fact that you assume everyone to take the same stance as you makes me question your ability to be open-minded

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The trailers were absolute trash. The main character didn't even look like CGI, it looked like AI slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That... that's called lighting effects... films have been using them since, well, the very beginning of film. Now I have zero proof that no AI whatsoever was used to make the movie, but you can't be mad because it LOOKS like they did. If nothing else that's just going to strengthen the link in people's brains between "AI art" and "(over)polished"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What are these comments? This is a comm for people who like movies? It's a Safdie movie that by all accounts is at least decent, even if it flirts with "Oscar bait". Weird to almost revel in its box office failure.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    The Rock always was a movie "star" because peoplee saw him as a relatable dude, he was never a good actor

    After becoming a diva, he destroyed his own value... plus only Rogan idiots care about MMA

    I like movies... nothing here calls my attention except perhaps the question "how did they drag Emily Blunt into this?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Rock always was a movie "star" because peoplee saw him as a relatable dude, he was never a good actor

    Is that actually the case? To me he never seemed relatable. If I had to describe him he is/was pretty much the personification of the type of movies he had success with. Over the top, generally positive and lighthearted, and firmly in the pure entertainment not art category. But I wouldn't call him relatable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Well, personally I agree with you... I have a real hard time with the American Celebrity Worship mentality but that is what I kept on reading online about The Rock.

    I never actually liked any of his movies because even if they are to be silly, action goofiness, I need a good cast that sells that... his wooden, always-the-same, performance was just boring. His are the type of movies I would not pause to go to the bathroom. However, this is a matter of taste and everybody can have their own and no need to justify them

    Having said that, I was very willing to be less critical of his work when I thought he was a nice guy to his fans... now that I know he is yet another self-centered diva, I couldn't care less if he retires and never makes another film

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Dwayne "The Scorpion King" Johnson complaining about the box office opening of his latest movie?

  • source
  • Havent seen it. But I've heard good things. Like its obvious Oscar bait, but one of the better performances by him.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Oooh that smashing machine, what did I watch

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    no, you're just not a good actor, and many other people had problems with you, cavil, vin disesal. plus you try to strongarm the DCU by trying to hijack it.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I know I saw an advertisement or two about this movie, I just couldn't tell you what it was about. Like it did no work at drawing me in and making me want to see the film. The only thing I remember about the ad was the rock looked like he had a weird shaped head in it. That's it that's all I got. I think he was a boxer and his head was weird that's it.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As someone who is a fan of pro wrestling it's kinda funny and a bit weird how quickly The Rock allowed his mask to slip.

    for years and years he was seen as a nice guy, giving people homes and trucks and what have you, even in the wrestling biz he was considered a nice guy. then the failures started happening and his demeanor and personality started to change or maybe his true nature started coming to light.

    Ends up he's not a good person. Ends up he's more like Hulk Hogan.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I do think this kind of tendency is fairly common. Most humans find it easier to be kind and giving when everything is going well for them. And conversely most humans, when their life starts going to shit, really find it difficult to care about other people's problems.

    Of course there are examples of people who are going through the worst time ever and still manage to muster up empathy and patience for others. I think people like that are remarkable because they are not the usual.

    (Not to defend Dwayne Johnson, I have no feelings at all about him or knowledge about what he has and has not done. Just a side note thought)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    Wait, a person looking for fame and fortune via glorifying themselves turned out to be a bad person?!

    ... Holy shit celebrity culture has cooked peoples' brains... cannot even finish my mock surprise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Two things that I just don’t give a shit about are The Rock and MMA. I may check this out when it gets to the streaming platforms, but that won’t. Be until football season is over.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    You can't controll box office results and believe me, we tried.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Or, just realize that simply having a famous name like yours doesn't make people automatically want to shell out $30+ a person to watch whatever slop you've decided to star in.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    "No one wants what I'm selling" ..Maybe stop making crap lol

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ironically, I'd imagine this is his best movie. Certainly the most grown up one. As far as I know, no explosions, almost certainly no cars flying off/through buildings etc. Just a drama for adults aka the kind of movie that hasn't done well at the box office for the last quarter century or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -17 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Oh no is the rich celebrity butt hurt their product didn’t sell.

    Oh no what is the rest of the world going to do?

    Probably focus on real issues instead of your advertising disguised as a story.

    Rich fucking shithead.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, how dare the actor discuss the movie he acted in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Salesman talking about mediocre sales.

    Nothing about this is credibly a good story or worth reading as a movie enthusiast.

    This is corporate propaganda at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You're not allowed to watch any movies or TV shows ever. By nature of audience size, they generate big incomes. You support the rich if you do. So you won't now, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    As much as the other guy is a trolling shithead, that logic you're using is about as stupid as the people who claim a pirated copy is literally a lost sale...

    Not only do movies and media in general have zero requirements for massive paychecks, there are many great shows/movies with tiny budgets where the people involved very much did NOT make The Rock sized wages. So you're plain wrong even on a fundamental level, let alone what you meant by using it as a response...

    It doesn't make OP right, it just makes that a very, very dumb comment, let alone comeback.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I agree with you, but the context doesn't make much sense. I can be cryptic, so it's my bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I hear you. I just have to push back against anyone who is clearly assuming certain jobs simply deserve their insanely high paychecks. Virtually nobody should be making The Rock kind of money, and anyone operating on the assumption that it's not only totally fine but should be assumed for some jobs really gets my hackles up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have downloaded everything I’ve watched for the last two decades 🏴‍☠️

    Literally doesn’t change shit for me bro. Try harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Fuckin' made my day. Oh, lordy.

    One of those snorts that's almost an actual laugh out loud moment. And no, you didn't make any jokes unless this is like some sort of character. Good shit.

  • source
  • parent