all 89 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I like mullvad because I can pay for it with vouchers and have nothing to tie my payment to my account#

I don't think any other VPN can do that.

Theres also the fact that mullvad was raided by the (Swedish)police and even though they fully complied, the police ended up walking away with nothing because mullvad had nothing to give them.

Proton on the other hand, will at the very least be storing your email, payment info, and possibly other info in your account that mullvad won't. I also don't like how they have aligned themselves with conservative politics.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    Mullvad.

    All you are to them is an account number. that's it. no name, no email, nothing. you can even pay in cash. while mullvad's GUI is still meh their CLI is top notch and very quick.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I used to have Mullvad and switched to Proton because I use pretty much their entire suite...

    If you don't need port forwarding, I think Mullvad is superior in everything. Such a great service, highly recommend it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    There's Port Forwarding with Proton VPN too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes there's port forwarding with proton, but not with mullvad they removed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Proton's CEO sucks. I canceled my extremely low-priced, grandfathered subscription and moved elsewhere. I had been a user since basically day one, a subscriber since available, and converted family members and friends to it. Not anymore.

    Mullvad has been stellar. Fast, anonymous, easy to use. Zero complaints.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Damn, I couldn't let go of my extremely-low priced grandfathered subscription. I contemplated about it and getting both mullvad and tuta but it ads up more than what I pay proton.

    Also, I believe proton ceo apologized or something like that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The apology kind of felt like a "sorry you're offended".

    I don't fault anyone for staying but I definitely don't champion them anymore. I did move to Tuta as well and it is far from as seamless of an experience - it does everything I need (including domain aliases), but it was much less intuitive to configure. The system is way slower with search (it doesn't index anything for privacy reasons) and in similar vein the mobile app only syncs something when opened. So you'll get a notification for a new email but when you open it doesn't load for 2-8 seconds.

    I get it all somewhat because they're only syncing what's needed at any point in time and decrypting it or whatever, but it does feel janky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I read this article and it certainly is something to consider.

    It talks about how Andy Yen was just pointing out how under Trump's first admin, they started to actually attack big tech when dems haven't done anything. Which is true. He praises Gail Slater and Lina Khan (but Lina Khan was recently fired...sooooo).

    They clarified how the andy1011000 (andy88) username probably is more about how Andy's birthday was in 1988 and 88 is a lucky number in Taiwan, unlikely that he's a white supremacist.

    They also traced the money of Proton's donations and none of the organizations were republican, and pretty much all of the donations align with the practices of Democrat donors.

    Andy has a history of posting online supporting Ukraine, being against xenophobia, against racism, supporting women in tech, supporting refugees receive education in Switzerland.

    When the Democrat party had proposals for regulatory efforts, Andy supported them.

    https://proton.me/blog/congress-antitrust-report

    He even made a tweet and blog post talking about the tech surveillance underneath the Trump administration and how people should fear it.

    So it seems to be that Andy is more liberal when donating money and publicly acknowledge whoever is in support of anti-trust and anti-surveillance to me.

    If it's the goal of Proton to seem neutral, then they maybe did it a little too well. They convinced people that Andy is a full on fascist when in reality, he seems better than democrat politicians we have nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    From what I gather these are about the IP Logging, deanonymizing user, and having accounts on temporary suspension.

    You could search it why on your own or even read the articles you just cited but basically.

    • Apparently the user broke swiss law and "Proton must comply with Swiss law. As soon as a crime is committed, privacy protections can be suspended". However, if the user used VPN, they could've gotten away with this tbh. Emails are encrypted so the only thing they got going for them was the IP address, and that was the weak point.
    • For the deanonymized user, their recovery email was an iCloud email. You don't need to use a recovery email, it's an option that the user chose.
    • Proton received an alert from CERT, saying that these users were linked to a North Korean APT group. But they couldn't verify (as they can't read encrypted emails), so they did the safe thing and temporary suspended them until they receiver further confirmation.

    It seems everything they did was to comply with the laws and 2 of these situations could've been easily avoided by the user. The third case just put their accounts in suspension for some further review.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Then why did they take the comments to double and triple and quadruple down after the initial issue?

    Unlike Ladybird, which is undeniably shit - I won't judge someone for using Proton. I realize people's takeaways from the situation are different. I've been fine without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I use both (not suggesting that). I mostly use Proton because it's already included in my plan, and they seem to have more connections to choose from, but I frequently have to switch because the one I'm on starts to get really slow. I like Mullvad's flat pricing and lack of commitment (they even accept cash), and it was an easier setup on Linux (at least Arch).

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    The main difference I see between the two is that Mullvad no longer offers port forwarding services and ProtonVPn does offer port forwarding services.

    This can make a big difference based on your use-case scenarios. If you are gaming and need port forwarding or are torrenting and need port forwarding Protonvpn is the better choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    PIA is also a good option if port forwarding is important to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Heads up PIA got acquired by an ad company a bit ago

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I use Proton VPN only because I use Proton everything else. If not, I'd probably consider Mullvad. But I'm in the US and regional pricing doesn't apply.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mullvad because it accepts cash payments.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Mullvad is more private but Proton VPN still supports port forwarding.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Both options are good. I think for the most part it boils down to wanting a single product or suite of products.

    While you certainly can get just one proton service, the idea of having an easy entry point into multiple privacy focused solutions is what they are going for.

    The pro argument for that is cheaper overall, simpler to get into and mange, etc. The con argument is an eggs in one basket philosophy isn't ideal because you can have a single point of failure. This is all subjective to your personal threat model.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Proton mail has an alias feature that I rather enjoy. Does anyone know an alternative service for that. I was looking to leave the proton ecosystem. Switching to mullvad is easy enough for vpn but im also looking at email etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Mullvad. Excellent service, never had an issue. Used to use Proton, but their CEO sucks ass

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I personally prefer the Mullvad client since, at least on MacOS, it allows you to exclude specific apps from the VPN, while the ProtonVPN client does not! I still use ProtonVPN instead though, since it's also significantly cheaper for me.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'd rather compare IVPN vs Mullvad.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I like mullvad i use their dns filtering and their socks5 proxies however it does lack port forwarding so it sucks for torrenting.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Does anyone here regard ivpn as a good vpn as well?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Definitely Mullvad, the whole point of VPN is to stay private and Proton does not accept crypto while Mullvad does.

    If the VPN has your payment details then any privacy just goes out the window.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    For sailing the seas, I like CryptoStorm.is Good speed with port forwarding.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    What about AirVPN? I haven't chosen any VPNs yet, mostly because I'm still not sure which to go with, but I never see anyone talk about Air, even though I once heard Proton or Air were the best choices.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Vote for the unlisted AirVPN because extremely easy to use, very moderate pricing, and specifically why I needed it, port forwarding.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Both of them are decent VPN choices at the end of the day. If one is 60% cheaper then the choice should be very easy unless you have too much money on your hand. Try 1 month of each and make a choice.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Moved from Proton to Mullvad to Windscribe

    Proton kept getting worse and is moving towards a walled garden.

    Mullvad seemed great on the private payment front. Their apps are pretty solid. The device limit was too low for me. For 6-10 devices the price doubles.

    Windscribe won me over with their build a plan option. Their apps aren't the most visually appealing but get the job done.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How is proton moving to a walled garden?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    A la carte pricing has gone out the window in favor of bundles. This enables the same subsidization model of business used by Apple, Google, etc. Even when you pay, they display ads and reminders to get you to upgrade to higher tiers. Drive launched in beta only for paid users. Drive now encourages the use of their proprietary document format. They hand out storage bonuses for each year of membership. That's not a sustainable long-term practice and purposefully creates stickiness. Generally speaking, they don't have easy export tools, so they're not very interoperable. Forwarding emails sent to @proton.me or @protonmail.com addresses to a new inbox is not possible unless you're a paying customer, which makes switching more difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Why don't you use a decentralized VPN like NymVPN? It's impossible for the company or anyone to take logs because your traffic is routed over several nodes. It's like Tor but also adds noise to data and harder to deanonymize

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    t’s like Tor but a decentralized one.

    ...so is Tor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sorry, you are right. But what I meant was it is very hard to deanonymize and monitor users of NymVPN. Tor network can be however monitored by NSA although chances are small that you will be deanonymized. And unlike Tor, NymVPN can offer 5 relays, which makes the chances that nodes can collaborate to deanonymize you to almost zero. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why do you want a VPN? Is it just for some light piracy? Staying safe on public wifi? Or do you actually NEED to maintain your privacy, with real consequences if you can't?

    If you need true privacy, the answer is Mullvad. But there's also more required than just switching on a VPN if you want privacy. If you want a convenient and easy VPN that's part of a bigger privacy-focused suite of tools, then I'd recommend Proton. They make some pretty good products.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Why do you want a VPN? Is it just for some light piracy? Staying safe on public wifi? Or do you actually NEED to maintain your privacy, with real consequences if you can’t?

    Nice try, FBI.

  • source
  • parent
  • If you care about things beyond the operations, the Proton boss came out in support of 47's adminstration with regards to regulating big tech IIRC. I'm not aware the Mullvad chief did something similar.

    Proton works well. But it's designed to be the basket for all your eggs (VPN, office suite, email, etc.). They want you to use all their services and push for upgrades to the highest tier. I found their customer support you be ... very ... slow.

    If you need port forwarding, AirVPN is another option. I think they're cheaper than Mullvad but it's held together by dedication and duct tape. It works okay but read their website first to see if you're okay with how it's set up.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (23 children)

    It's kind of sad, that people still believe that VPN is a safe option. Sure, it ads a layer, but anyone who wants to know who you are, can find out by your fingerprints, your accounts, anything you put out there. So if you do anything but light surfing, then you are not anonymous with VPN.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    people still believe that VPN is a safe option

    What does that sentence even mean without context?

    Safe against whom? I'm pretty convinced a VPN is safe against :

    • your boss or manager if you somehow browse on your corporate network
    • your flatmates or family member if you browse at home and do not necessary trust them or whomever setup the router
    • your school
    • the manager of the cafe you are using WiFi on

    I'm pretty convinced might be safe against larger scale surveillance :

    • your ISP if it is not doing deep packet inspection (and that's pretty much per country basis AFAICT)

    I'm pretty convinced might NOT be safe against professional individual surveillance :

    • state level professionals using exploits and actually knowing your name, not your nickname
    • your VPN provider or the cloud provider you rely on to install the backend side of Wireguard or OpenVPN

    So... no I don't think anyone can make your VPN pointless. Clearly the random person sitting next to me in a cafe can not. Only few people with the technical expertise or power can do that. None of that matters though if you already volunteer your information elsewhere publicly on private platforms like Instagram or YouTube though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You certainly are "pretty much"... :-)

    So, what do you do, since you don't trust your family? Seems pretty much suspect there... or pretty much paranoid.

    You are not safe against any of those you mention. Don't you know what VPN does, and does not?

    You are pretty much NOT safe against large scale surveillance.

    Thanks for backing me up, with the last thing you wrote. And then please go read up on what VPN actually does, and does not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    alright then, keep your secrets

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I always keep my secrets. :-)

    I have also linked to a couple of articles that touch on what I'm talking about...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Under no circumstance does that mean it is not worth getting one. Particularly dependent on where one lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    It certainly does - if you don't know how to actually use it in a proper way, because then it becomes totally meaningless to even have VPN... No matter where you live. Please read up on what it does and does not!

    https://www.pcmag.com/explainers/7-dangerous-vpn-myths-you-probably-believe

    https://www.tomsguide.com/features/are-you-really-invisible-when-you-use-a-vpn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Yes locks on your door are pointless because if someone wants to break into your house they're going to do it once way or another, especially if you leave the window open

    This is a dumb take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    You are right, your take is really dumb. So why do you share it?

    A dumb take is, to pay for something you might get nothing from. But hey, you do you... VPN-providers are happy for people like you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    A dumb take is, to pay for something you might get nothing from.

    You just described every form of insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    To you, maybe... I'm sorry to hear that your insurances isn't working for you.

    What I described might be taken as me describing an insurance, that you totally foil, without knowing it, because you didn't read the policy, and you don't know what it covers and doesn't cover.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    If everyone always got payouts for the insurance they pay into, the industry literally could not exist.

    It's the entire business model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Clueless... If you have insured your house against fire, and your house burns down, you should always get the money you have insured it for. If the shed in your yard is not covered by that insurance, you won't get any money if it burns down. That's logic. If you want money for that too, it should be included in the police.

    But I see that you really don't get the point here, even though you wanted to use "insurance" as the (faulty) example here. Maybe you should stick to the topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    A dumb take is, to pay for something you might get nothing from

    And which VPN provider is it you're getting "nothing" from? There seems to be a budding market for VPN's out there, lots of people are paying for them and continue to do so, why do you think that is? Because the whole world is stupid and it's a pointless waste of money? Or because they are actually in fact getting some kind of use from them?

    VPN's have a myriad of uses, you're focusing on some ambiguous nation-state attacker tracking you down for whatever reason. Meanwhile, quite a lot of users would just like to watch porn without having to submit ID. I'd say they're getting plenty of use out of their VPN for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Do take the time to read the comments, so you get the context.

    As I already said, if you don't know how to keep your usage of the internet private, then you will not be private with a VPN either. VPN doesn't keep you private. It will help you to attain a little more privacy, but only is you use it right.

    Please don't tell me what I am focusing on, when I haven't even said it... Making straw man arguments is low. Lying is low...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Please don't tell me what I am focusing on, when I haven't even said it

    I literally quoted you, so don't try playing the "I never actually said that" card.

    It's ironic that you're now complaining about context and strawmen when you yourself started it with the whole "anyone who wants to know who you are..." argument. This mysterious "anyone" is the ultimate strawman because they're anonymous and all encompassing. Meanwhile, you have zero idea what anyone wants from their VPN's so you're making the broad, sweeping statements while lacking any context yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    you’re focusing on some ambiguous nation-state attacker tracking you down for whatever reason

    I didn't write that anywhere... You are clueless, to say that you "literally quoted" me... You didn't. What a great liar you are.

    It's ironic that you are this dumb, so please go troll someone else with your childish way of making shit up in a debate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You've been making shit up since this whole debate started. You're the textbook definition of "perfection is the enemy of good enough" because 99% of people will find that a VPN is good enough but according to you they're worthless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    99 % percent will find, that they think they are safe, and yet they are not.

    Thanks for your made up history about me. Hope it made you feel better. :-) But it didn't refute anything I have said. And since you can't either, you just go ad hominem... That's just sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago*

    I dont use the well known ones, seems to me that those would be the first to have backdoors since people pick them.

    I have a vpn that is never mentioned anywhere. Perfect.

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Any reason Private Internet Access (PIA) isn’t in the running? I’ve been using it for years now with no complaints or issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)