top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Vibrators are fine but when I whip out the premium™️ silicone vagina / asshole combo with a high speed self lubricating vortex cervix and the 36GG BIG TIDDY™️ attachment with Alexa integration I’m ruining he mood 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Well putting it like that is kinda belittling. I hear it as “well, sorry, you ain’t no LeBron James.” Is that the joke?

    Not the sentiment though. If the woman wants some fun with a vibrator, go to town! Tell me to jump, and I’ll ask how high. Get your partner to have fun, however they want; it is not that complicated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I've dated a couple of girls who can't get off without a vibrator.

    It's hard to get mad at that. They've got their thing and it works. If your dick or tongue can't shake at 30 wiggles a second, why complain? So long as we both get off by the end of it, everyone has a good time.

    What's the problem?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Equally, I've hooked up with some guys who struggle to get off during sex itself (which may be because the grip one uses while masturbating may be firmer than what one experiences during sex).

    Having slept with both women and men, I feel like the pressure to reach orgasm seems like it's bad for everyone. One dude I knew felt super insecure about not getting off, which stemmed from a previous partner taking it personally. It's certainly the case that for some men, it can feel uncomfortable to have sex and not reach orgasm. However, I think that everyone would have a better time if people decoupled satisfaction from orgasm.

    If I wanted to be certain that I'd get off, then the use of a vibrator helps a lot. That's not necessarily my goal though; some of the best sex I've ever had didn't result in me reaching orgasm, and I find it frustrating when people don't understand that this is possible (I find this problem more common with men). Of course, that's just personal to me — some people may consider reaching orgasm to be an essential part of "good sex", but that's why good communication is the best skill one can develop for better sex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    I'm one of those guys that struggles to orgasm. Even masturbating I will sometimes last a really long time. It's more a mood thing than a sensation thing for me. I have to have my mind in the right state to orgasm. The good thing about it is I can have sex for as long as my partner wants often.

    It's odd, because usually men are the ones who leave their partners wanting. For me my partners pretty much always get more than they bargained for, but I'm frequently left without orgasming. It's fine though. It's still plenty enjoyable without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The stories you've lived are the ones that seem more meaningful. For a guy, climax is a given, and sometimes the whole point just for maintenance purposes. The wholesome joy of a thing is made impure by ulterior motives. It took me a while to see it from the other side.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If your dick or tongue can’t shake at 30 wiggles a second, why complain?

    I would imagine for the same reason that women complain about men who cant cum without their pornhub deathgrip...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Life is too short not to have a good vibrator, no matter what bits you have or what bits you are attracted to, doesn't matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Excellent prank tool, if nothing else. “Honey, I swear I wasn’t railing scores of whores. I have no idea where the vibrator came from! Please don’t leave, I’ll do anything. Please, I’ve been working so hard to keep us afloat, and we do date night every other night and I love you and the kids. You started smiling again, Jimmy isn’t setting fires anymore, and Alissa is going to graduate soon. Please, just don’t go!”

    Ha, classic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Isn't it all about having pleasant fun together?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Yes, and for me the indirect feeling of the vibrator as part of sex is massive turn on. Also directly in certain positions. Or knowing she use it to get off by herself because being jealous of that would be like her being jealous of my hand.

    It is an addition to the fun, like lingerie or lube or anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We god fearing Christian folk don't use any kind of lewd objects when engaging in activities designed to expand the kingdom. They will turn you from an upstanding citizen in to a degenerate back-alley harlot faster than you can say "forgive me father for I have sinned". We get two minutes of dry missionary sex once a month with blindfolds on and only the smallest amount of movement possible to procreate. Anything more is shameful and should be outlawed post haste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Too many guys take it as a swipe at their ability to please their partner when a woman needing a vibrator typically has zero to do with his ability to get her off and everything to do with her ability to get off.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I would have no issue with vibrator usage, since that's a tool, not a person. But I don't think I want anyone else dunking on my gf while I make the alley-oop.

    From the emasculated male perspective, LeBron is the competitor, not your teammate.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    While I comple agree with her, you're right that metaphor is kind of ... meh. Like I get what she's trying to say it's just that you can twist that metaphor in some uncomfortable ways.

    Btw the magic wand is the answer if you don't like the vibrator idea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Btw the magic wand is the answer if you don't like the vibrator idea

    The magic wand....vibrator?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well one is internal use, and the other is external……usually

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    As long as my woman has an earth-shattering orgasm, I don't care how she gets there.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Do you think a vibrator being involved and being a meaningful part of an orgasm are mutually exclusive? Hint: They're absolutely not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you believe the only reason to have sex is to reach an orgasm and that the only valuable contribution to it is being the one that does it, then sure, but there's so much more to it than that.

    Now, I wanna be clear. I'm not telling you how to have sex. I'm not saying the way you want to have it is wrong. If you want to be the one doing it and no vibrators involved, there's nothing wrong with that. But acting like that's the only way to have sex? No, there are so many more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think being there while she does it is a turn on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m not emasculated by it, and very much enjoy it. Hitachi magic wands are so much fun. Thrusting rabbits are a delight.

    But….

    The ones that are realistic penis replicas….

    I get a bit turned off looking down and seeing a veiny flesh-colored penis in my hand. Just kinda takes me out of the moment. If I were bi, I’m sure it’d be lovely. But it’s just not for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I never considered this would bother anyone. The vibrator gets used probably over half the time my partner and I have sex. Even when she cums from oral and we move to PIV then when I’m getting ready I’ll hand her the vibrator when I’m getting close because her climaxing again makes it hit a lot harder for me. Usually I’m inside of her actively while she uses it but on rare occasions when I go clean up she will stay back and finish for another time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Its funny cause before i wouldnt have had a problem with it but they way she put it is kinda interesting lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago

    I showed it to my gf she laughed, no insecurities when you know though heh. Cause LeBron doesn't need to perform in the bedroom he does his work on the court, others have to do it in other less spacious rooms without millions watching thank fucking God. No viewers opinions when you're there. Like a damn a parole hearing each time, they want to critic each bit. But have fun and make sure it ain't too bad ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    While I agree that feeling EMASCULATED by a vibrator is ridiculous, as men are not meant to have vibrating functionality, I think just as many women would feel just as bummed out by it if men did a similar thing. Imagine if a man only got like half of the way there fucking you, then pulled out and was like "oh quick get that super tight fleshlight out so I can cum". Is it really so hard to understand why that might feel bad? Like sure, this fleshlight thing may be tighter than any biological vagina ever could be, but does that really make it not bother you? And even if it doesn't bother you, wouldn't it be nice if that wasn't always necessary?

    Because although penises aren't meant to vibrate, and vaginas aren't meant to squeeze like a tight fist, penises ARE "supposed" to please vaginas and vice versa, and if the literal climax of pleasure is not attainable by those means, why are we acting like that's a silly thing to wish was different?

    Don't all people, regardless of their own sex or gender, or the gender of their partner, enjoy the idea of bringing their partner to orgasm using their own body and not a device? I have made my girlfriend orgasm manually, orally, penetratively, and with vibrators. They're all fun ways to do it! But if we could only do it with a vibrator, I'd certainly be wishing we could get there other ways too. Is that really so silly? Each method has its own charms. So it seems very insensitive to put down these feelings, and it's also gross to do it with a sports metaphor.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (17 children)

    The reality is that it is generally harder for people with a vagina to achieve orgasm than for those with a penis. There are very much evolutionary reasons for that and... let's not talk about that because it is dark as fuck.

    In a perfect world? Two (or more) partners will always climax at the same time and everything will be wonderful. But that just isn't reasonable. Maybe its been a while and one partner finishes faster. Maybe its stressful at work and you thought it would work but it just isn't. And maybe you just kind of want the borderline sensory overload that sex toys tend to be capable of.

    The reality is that partners should work towards making sure everyone orgasms as much as they want to. If that involves external stimulation with a vibrator while you have vaginal sex? Go for it. If that involves finishing someone off with a handy? Go for it. And so forth.

    And if you feel that not being able to make your partner cum the way you want to is a problem? Grow the fuck up. Everyone is different and everyone responds to some stimuli better than others and that can change from week to week. If your partner really likes a vibrator? Awesome, work with that. Integrate it into the fun. Rather than get angry that they don't want you to fingerbang them instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    For sure for sure. I hope that my agreement with this sentiment was clear in my post. But there's nothing about that sentiment that precludes someone from also reasonably wishing that they could bring their partner to orgasm without non-organic, non-self implements.

    I'm saying, people shouldn't be averse to using the vibrator - but just because they shouldn't be averse to it doesn't mean that it's bad, dumb, or unreasonable to also wish to not always use the vibrator to orgasm or to have your partner orgasm.

    The fact that its impractical doesn't make it a shameful desire that should be eradicated. Some people wish their partner would fill them up with like, 4 cups of semen. That's unrealistic (impossible). If they say "I don't want to fuck you because you never produce 4 cups of semen like how I'd prefer", then that is stupid and bad behavior, just like not making your partner orgasm with a vibrator just because you wish they didn't need it is stupid and bad. But the wishing in itself should not be condemned.

    I think the assumption that just because the wish exists, anger also exists is part of the problem that leads to condemnation of the wish. "And if you feel that not being able to make your partner cum the way you want to is a problem? Grow the fuck up." - absolutely true, but just because someone wants their partner to cum in a different way than they actually do, doesn't mean they see it as a problem. It may just be a desire or fantasy. Additionally, if that desire is central to their own sexual satisfaction, it doesn't seem too unreasonable to say that that's not wrong of them but rather an irreconcilable sexual difference. If someone really likes fingerbanging girls, but their girl hates it, that's not a situation where either of them is in the wrong or needs to change what they're attracted to - it's just an incompatibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But the wishing in itself should not be condemned.

    No. It very much should be.

    A good mindset is "How can I pleasure my partner more". A bad mindset, and what you are describing, is "Why won't my partner orgasm the way I want to".

    The former is... a partnership. It is knowing what does and doesn't work and communicating and adjusting.

    The latter is getting angry that someone... is a someone. You know what you want to do and they don't want to do it so that makes you angry. And that is really shitty.

    Don't get me wrong. Everyone has intrusive thoughts. The key is to realize "huh. That is really shitty. Let's work towards not having those thoughts and never fucking tell anyone about them".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago*

    You are still conflating "I would like it if I could make my partner orgasm with my bare hands" and "why won't my partner orgasm the way I want to" as beliefs that must always go together. But it is totally possible to simultaneously believe and act on all the following:

    1. How can I pleasure my partner more?
    2. I love making my partner cum with the vibrator
    3. I don't expect my partner to cum the way I want them to
    4. I would like it if I could make my partner orgasm in more ways than they currently do (i.e with my bare hands rather than a vibrator)

    Isn't it? At least, I see no reason for mutual exclusivity of these

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I really don't think it it is harder for vagina owners to achieve orgasm.

    I think it's just that nobody has any fucking idea how they work. Including many of the people that have them.

    It's dead easy if you take the time to learn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree although I have a sample size of 1 so I dont like to generalize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    You can't generalize how fast genders climax. There is no settled science on that, and its something that varies wildly from person to person. There are women out there that reach orgasms with their partners just as quickly as you'd expect a man to.

    The whole idea of generalizing intimacy is insanity, honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You know the problem I have? Women don't communicate with their partners. It has been my observation that women would rather gossip with their friends about how bad a man is about sex, than communicate with him to make it better.

    The behavior I have got out of women about dating and sex seems to be as much of the effort that goes into the whole thing as possible should be transferred to the man.

    • It's his job to ask a woman out.
    • It's his job to plan the date.
    • It's his job to pick her up and drive her to the restaurant/theater/skating rink/gladiatorial arena.
    • It's his job to pay for everything.
    • It's his job to drive her to his place.
    • It's his job to open the car door for her.
    • It's his job to carry her body into the house as she goes limp.
    • It's his job to undress her.
    • It's his job to undress him.
    • It's his job to put on a condom.
    • It's his job to fuck her.
    • It's his job to give her an orgasm.

    All of this ideally without any of her active participation or input, because dating, romance and sex are things that are done to women by men, and her job is to absorb it all like a tampon.

    I've been with chicks that didn't seem to care if they came, because they weren't able or willing to articulate what they wanted in bed. If she doesn't care, why should I? It starts eroding your ability to trust women after awhile. What else won't you talk to me about? What other problems are brewing that you're going to explode at me later? What else can I just not take your word for because you won't just talk to me? If this isn't what you want, what DO you want, and what is your plan on getting it? What is this sex eventually going to cost me?

    Lesbians of Lemmy, are lesbians as useless as straight women?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    To answer your question:

    • When it comes to initiating, somewhat. A lot of queer women, would much rather stand around giving hints than making moves, especially ones who primarily have experience with men (and I've noticed a tendency for bi women to especially expect lesbians to play all of the masculine roles).

    • Date planning is a toss up, but ime it's usually a lot more casual.

    • We typically both show up at the location or meet at the driver's home, and honestly I assumed that straight people did the same.

    • You show up prepared to pay for both of you, usually you pay for yourself, and sometimes one will offer to pay for the other, usually with a response of "you really don't have to, I'll get the next one." (That one's also one where women who mostly date men sometimes assume you're taking the masculine role).

    • Driving really depends on how you got there. And who's place you go back to is often reliant on a variety of factors, like when I met my wife we went to her place despite her having roommates because she was in the city and my apartment was like an hour out of town.

    • Once again, had no idea that was an expectation anymore, sounds like some 50s bs

    • I don't think my wife or I could physically do that, and if we stayed out too late or one of us got too drunk to get indoors without being carried there'd be an uncomfortable conversation in the morning. Also a lot of the bi women I've dated have been of a size that their husbands couldn't do that.

    • Undressing is a frantic, seductive, and silly display early on and slowly moves to a causal affair as the relationship matures.

    • Idk, you usually strap yourself up if you're going that route. You bring and prepare your own equipment.

    • Sex is considered mutual or you're considered a bad lay unless you were upfront about being stone (only wants to give not to receive) or a pillow princess (only wants to receive not to give) beforehand.

    Ultimately I think the difference comes down to expectations. In sapphic relationships the expectation is communication and mutuality. Straight relationships have existing roles and it's very easy to not see what you're not doing or to think of it as only fair or even worse as adversarial. I've long been an advocate to women who date men to take on some of these masculine expectations at the beginning to create a foundation of equality and to weed out men who are uncomfortable with it. Hell, a lot of these expectations you listed are elements of agency and while yes it would be nice to have a no effort on my part but showing up and looking pretty date, it wouldn't be a good foundation for a relationship.

    I will note that I don't do butch-femme which is more likely to follow traditional gender roles, and I mostly date neurodivergent women who tend to be more insistent on clear communication regardless of orientation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm a straight man, I've dated mostly straight women with some allegedly bi women in there. The bi chicks didn't really behave much different to the straight chicks.

    Initiating. I've seen women remind themselves and each other not to initiate. Chanting "We attract, not chase" like a mantra. Not initiating, not approaching, not asking out seems to be something women actively and consciously want to do. I've had female friends over the years that have said to me "There's this guy I really like but he won't ask me out" and I say "You ask him out" and it's "NO OMG I could never! What if he says no?!" Because rejection is for men.

    Date planning. I was once SCREAMED AT for asking a woman where she wanted to eat. A girl I was in a long-term relationship with, who said "I love you" to me, SCREAMED IN MY FACE for having the utter audacity to ask what she was hungry for. Sorry for an attempt to be considerate, I'll make sure that never happens again.

    Transportation. Very early on, there's the "I don't want to reveal my home to you in case you're dangerous" thing at which you'll meet somewhere, and she'll always be late because showing up on time is a sign of respect. Women are not bashful about demanding a man has a car, a few of them are bashful about demanding it's a nice car she can show off to her friends. Most of the time when traveling together, he will drive his car, because it's his resources being spent. Plus it frees her up to talk on her phone.

    Opening doors, especially car doors. Oh for about 20 years it was "HOW DARE YOU open a door for me?! Are you trying to say I'm an invalid? That I can't open a door because I'm a woman?" So men stopped, and now it's "What happened to chivalry? I want a man that opens doors for me." What women want is defined as what men aren't doing. Start doing it, they'll stop wanting it.

    On carrying her. Somewhat sarcastic here, but straight chicks do seem to like the ending of Officer and a Gentleman. I can lift a person of my own size, but I can't carry them far in a bridal carry, and women tend not to like being thrown over a shoulder.

    On undressing. Most of the women I've dated, from many different backgrounds, of a range of ages, would lie down fully clothed and expect to be undressed by me. One told me she liked it. Thing is, ALL of them lay down fully clothed and then want to be stripped, which is difficult to do. We'd walk into the bedroom together, I'd start kissing standing up, she pulls herself out of my arms and lays down in the bed fully clothed. So that I get to lift her ass to pull her pants off, so that I get to lift her back to unhook her bra. Next one that does that is getting cut out of her clothes with paramedic's shears. And she won't make a move to undress me, it's back to initiating. She's passive, remember? Can't let on that you want it, can never let your partner know you're attracted to them. We must act begrudging.

    On condoms. There's a stereotype that men don't like wearing condoms because they don't feel as good, that women want men to wear condoms for safety because she bears the brunt of the physical risk. In my experience, women hate condoms. They want NOTHING to do with choosing them and do NOT want to touch them, like a condom fresh from the package is a revolting item. A condom is most comfortably worn and works the best when applied to and worn on a fully erect penis, so ladies, here's what you do: Make the putting condom on moment as awkward as you can by being really weird about it. That'll definitely help him want to wear it.

    Sex and orgasms. There's definitely an attitude that between men and women, sex is something that men do to, or extract from, women. Women often express dislike for being on top or the active partner. Some women seem to think sex is lying there and letting him use you. And, most on point to the OP topic, men hear "size doesn't matter" and then are shamed for having a little dick, we're told don't be emasculated by my sex toys then shamed for not making you cum. There's no truth, only manipulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    •It's his job to carry her body into the house as she goes limp.

    •It's his job to undress her.

    Uhhhh… feeling a little rapey at this point.

    I've been with chicks that didn't seem to care if they came, because they weren't able or willing to articulate what they wanted in bed. If she doesn't care, why should I? It starts eroding your ability to trust women after awhile. What else won't you talk to me about? What other problems are brewing that you're going to explode at me later? What else can I just not take your word for because you won't just talk to me? If this isn't what you want, what DO you want, and what is your plan on getting it? What is this sex eventually going to cost me?

    Also, are you asking the women about these things or are you getting mad that they won’t tell you on their own?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Uhhhh… feeling a little rapey at this point.

    Yeah sex with women always does. For all the bitching about consent you hear, they hate actually communicating it in the moment. Best case scenario, it's that passivity again; she wants to "be taken." When's the last time you heard a woman describe a sexual fantasy that involved an exchange of permission?

    Also, are you asking the women about these things or are you getting mad that they won’t tell you on their own?

    Both. I've asked a lot of women questions they evade or outright ignore. Especially about sex. Also, FUCK YES I'm mad they won't communicate on their own. Women are people, right? Sometimes I'm not so sure, we can't ever hold them to "people" level standards of accountability, like saying what your intentions are in a relationship under her own power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe look for less shallow women?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And there it is. Everything is always a man's fault. I guess women's strategy is, you can't be accountable for your actions if you never actually do anything.

    Also, if a man wants a woman for sex, he's shallow. If a woman wants a man for sex, she's not shallow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Not really, there's plenty women who aren't materialist and role obsessed. Therefore I'd suggest looking for a different type.

    Either that or just visit a prostitute, you get to choose the woman you want and just sex and nothing else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Sometimes you just don't have time. Like, brother.. Come on.. I'm almost 40. It's not as easy to jackhammer my wife at the perfect angle for 25 straight minutes anymore. It's better for everyone, her included, if she helps rub that shit out and we can both be asleep by 10pm. We have work tomorrow, and you know our daughter's going to come pitter-pattering in here at 4:30am to say she's hungry because she couldn't be fucked to eat more than two beans and a half a chicken tender the night prior.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Plus if you're the type to get more satisfaction from your partner's pleasure than your own (which I'm hoping goes for everyone reading this), if toys help her come more times, why wouldn't you do it? I know I always enjoyed it more that way, SHE was the one who didn't want it too often lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Should be able to elicit an orgasm with oral in far less than 40 minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Sure, if your SO is into it. Many aren't.

    Also, it's not one or the other, variety is good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Well, people arent immutable, and romance and intimacy develops over time. I'd say a guy or girl who needs very specific conditions to orgasm has some intimacy issues. I'd imagine people might not want to be with people who have hangups like that.

    Oh my bad, sorry, I meant to say everyone's perfect the way they are, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -22 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Thanks for letting me know what that sounded like. Next time I'll add an /s at the end so that the dim individuals among us (not you, of course..) can more easily recognize humor on a sub that's devoted to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    The real comedy is in the comments we found along the way.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    See, men are told by movies and stories that they need to be "the hero" (singular) not "best team player" or "important helper". nope. main character or bust.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›