all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I thought I knew which study this was talking about, and I was going to say "Yes, it's to help with situations where surgical intervention is needed to put the bone back together" but I went and found the article I read and that one was a team of American and Korean scientists, so I actually don't know about the Chinese one. I assume it's the same idea, that it's for use in surgical situations.

    The one I thought it was talking about was this one, which is a cool idea but still has some kinks to work out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343380.shtml

    I can't read the specific study they're citing here, but from reporting on it this sounds like it's being just a little bit overhyped - a quick setting glue is critically important, but the situations in which you'd use a metal plate for osteoimmobilization are with extreme displaced fractures and something that could even be accessed with a 3 minute surgery (and evidently yes, this glue does require surgery) would not merit a metal plate in any case.

    The actual development sounds like it's a very fast setting bone-bonding bio-absorbing surgical glue that doesn't require extensive cleaning of the bonding site. That does sound like an extremely useful development, but it's also not a novel product by any means. This seems like another entry in the trend of pro-china hyped science reporting that absolutely removes all the interesting details in their quest to push a narrative (which uh... no hang on, that's all modern science reporting)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I could be wrong, but China now surpassed US in terms of R&D spending. That explains a lot.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And it's being done without regard for maximizing profit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Not even exactly that - r&d basically always has huge returns for decades or even centuries.

    It's just investing, not prioritising short-term profits ... and not having a system where the economy collapses if profits fall, not even necessarily into negative territories. They just need/want infrastructure, so they build it to have it (and profit from externalities of having said infrastructure, not building in some sort of direct profitability features). They want clan air, they pass laws & directives.

    It's not black or white, but def the shade contrasts with western world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don't like the authoritarianism, but I kinda like China's approach to reorient the economy depending on the needs. Too much economic growth at the expense of public investment, and they will reorient towards more public services and vice versa. This sounds similar to Keynesian economics and I am an old school proponent of Keynesianism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Neither capitalism nor authoritarianism are necessary to breed innovation. Lots of non-authoritarian places have great science, too.

    Also, great science does not suggest a country is a good place to live. There's lots of great science being done in the US, too, despite its horribleness.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    But 4 is bigger and better than 3, so that invention must be better.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’m back in the us for the first time in 6 years.

    I was just asked to leave by a machine after buying a $4 bottle of water in the airport.

    What the hell?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The vending machine asked you to leave it was there a separate machine just to ask for the leaving?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Tbf, America is busy arguing about the Superbowl halftime show... and how big the wh ballroom will be... and whether the UN escalator tried to assassinate the president...

  • source
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    You can't make an omelette without beating a few Uyghurs.

    (Chinese proverb)

    This may be the most racist thing I've seen this week. Holy shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The han chinese are welcome to stop committing genocide, cultural and otherwise, any time they like. Though I acknowledge it's their government and not all of them as a whole. Strictly speaking.

    And if it isn't racist to criticize Americans for doing similar things, it isn't racist to point out when China does it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's not at all what they're doing though.

    It's entirely a racist trope to do the Chinese Proverb part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It's literally what they're doing. They even have a name for it that they use proudly. Called the one China policy. It's whole goal is to eradicate divergent culture and groups. At home and aspirationally, imperialisticly in the country of Taiwan. Do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No the user was trying to make it a Chinese proverb about breaking people like eggs. That's the extremely racist part.

    Which then has people going well acksually it's fine to say that because it makes China look bad.

    Do better.

    I'm not the one excusing racist speach

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's cultural appropriation at worst. It's absurd to call that racism and belittles what racism actually is. But racism is always the first go-to of those who cannot defend their views.

    It would be like calling anyone who caricatures or uses the trope of the loud mouth, ignorant, 6 gun-toating, ten-gallon hat, wearing American as racist. Is it confrontational or antagonistic? Absolutely. Racist? Not even. Do you want to know what is actually racist? White washing or apologizing for white supremacy or han supremacy. I support the KKK and the CCP equally. Not at all.

    You're doing worse than excusing racist speech. Similar to what Israel is doing to redefine anti-Zionism to antisemitism. Muddying the waters and making the terms meaningless. Any time, no matter the civility of the critique regarding China. Racism and sinophobia gets shouted as a blanket get out of jail free card. And as someone who has an appreciation for China's deep cultural diversity and heritage. A love of the distinctly Chinese Hong Kong cinema and many of it's actors, producers and directors. 9 times out of 10 the accusation is often outright DARVO if not hyperbolic.

    I agree their post was antagonistic and designed to provoke. But it was no more racist than the meme it was posted under.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You mean the one China policy that the department of State also recognizes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    And? I'm an anarchist. I disagree with most of the stuff our government does. Them recognizing a policy of a similar capitalist and fascistic group doesn't justify it to me. The American and Chinese people both need to rise up against the capitalist that seek to oppress and rule over us. Don't be a hypocrite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Except there's no proof other than us sinophobic propaganda

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Well, I mean, if you ignore all the people whose loved ones are being withheld and imprisoned. Sure, there's no evidence. But you would have to be a really dishonest hypocritical person to do that. Especially since the Chinese government themselves doesn't deny that they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    When you can't read that you are in a communist space

    When you can't read that you are in a communist space

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    of course it's tankie, its showing how bad capitalism is 🙃

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments