top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 157 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Only one way to settle this: A GAY-OFF!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    OK, go whats your favorite off broadway musical?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not gay, let alone gay enough to know which musicals are and aren't Broadway. I've seen quite a few musicals elsewhere, though, so I can be on the panel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nope, it's me and I bet you can't prove me wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them....maybe you can hire The Gay-Team.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Does the big burly black man still need to be drugged to fly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So entire human sexuality can be described as being between two people at each ends.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Only if you think someone's position on the spectrum never changes over time. Which, judging from the microsecond moment of pause induced in "straights" by the proximity of shirtless Jason Momoa, is not how this works.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Whoever is gayest could change from moment to moment as individual scores fluctuate. Or maybe you have to look at it as an average of all those cumulative scores. Rich had a fleeting moment of straightness, in an otherwise 100% gay life, that puts him a hair behind Stephan, whose gayness has been unwavering since birth.

    More likely though, I think whether you look at the cumulative, or second to second, its a many way tie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think of it like beauty - there’s not much disagreement about whether someone is a 9, but a 10 is completely subjective. For someone to be breathtakingly stunning, there usually has to be something about them that most other people don’t see.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So......like, born with TWO penis's, and both of them are super gay?

    Most people never see your two penii, or your 37 nipples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Not necessarily, there could just be a hard limit that multiple people hit. They're gayness is pegged, if you will. 😏

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Once you get to the elite ranks there will always be disagreement on how to score the parameters of ultimate gayness

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It's more that each person will have a moment in their life when they are at their gayest

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    But that doesn't change the fact that every moment there'll exist someone who is the gayest, it's just the same person may not hold that status for a very long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh dang, so you're saying I was the gayest person on earth once, but because it happened in my sleep, I never noticed? That explains those dreams.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not necessarily. You might never be the gayest person on Earth (at one given moment), but there was (or will be) the gayest moment you ever were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    More importantly does that mean people can be ordered by that and can we construct a binary search tree to find anyone with a specific value of gay within O(log_2(n)) time?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If and only if you can define "gay" on a one dimensional axis, otherwise it would be like plotting points on an N-dimensional graph, I'm pretty sure "gay" is a multiple dimensions thing.

    So sadly we wont be getting a

    tree: BinaryTree<Person> = BinaryTree::new_sorted_by(order_gayest);
    

    anytime soon 😒

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There is at least a time component to consider, as you might feel gayer some days than others. It likely also depends on your company, that is, if you are around a lot of hot men who are open to the idea of gay relations but not many hot women interested in you, you might feel gayer than if it were the other way around. So by sorting the population you would skew the amount of gay in a population by grouping gay people around gayer people and not as gay people with the even less gay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, and according to those mean kids on Xbox Live, it’s me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Sigh… yes. We’ve already been over this guys.

    Frankie Grande is the gayest person. Freddie Mercury is the most bi person. Sabrina Carpenter is the straightest person.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    Casual Sex implies the existence of Ranked Competitive Sex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] [S] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    "Hey, girl; how much do I gotta pay to open your loot box?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    Tactical Espionage Action Sex

    • written by Hideo Kojima
    • directed by Hideo Kojima
    • produced by Hideo Kojima
    • starring Hideo Kojima
    • special thanks to...
    • Hideo Kojima

    (2025 all rights reserved Hideo Kojima Productions)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Idk Harley owners seem to be right up there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yes it does, and Grant O'Brien is a STRONG contender for that title.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Brennan, Lily, and Tao each have a moment during that episode where they're reading a thing and their brains turn back on in emergency mode and they realize to their astonishment what they're reading. I usually don't like cringe humor, but those looks are the reason I can still watch True Facts About Grant Anthony O'Brien.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    He once sucked 49 dicks in a night at a sex party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • Yeah, and it's almost certainly some Baptist prosperity gospel preacher with nineteen children.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Whenever someone breaks a barrier as "The first gay..." remember that they're technically "the gayest...".

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Someone sucked the most dicks, so yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • If they sucked 2 cocks a day (conservative, I know) over a gay career of fifty years, that would be 36,500 cocks. Which is a very respectable number imo. But is that gayer than a guy in a committed relationship sucking the same cock 36,500 times?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    It does mean that, yeah.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Not necessarily, there probably exists multiple orderings on gayness , the question is if you can create a total ordering and if its multiple people are maximally gay, or at least if the gayest people are equally gay.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    That's what Big Gay wants you to believe.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Scientifically speaking no, just like 2 objects can have the exact same color multiple people can all be on the end of this spectrum.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Colours are a spectrum. That doesn't stop two things from being the same hue/wavelength

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    I've seen sexualities you people wouldn't believe. Drag Queens at the Fyre Festival off the shoulder of Orion's Disco. I watched sequined gowns glitter in the dark near the Berghain Entrance. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›