top 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I dunno. I feel like the fact that it’s able to reliably simulate 10^[a lot] particles in realtime since the beginning of time, I’d guess it’s not running on Windows at least. But I also have a hard time it’s Linux because someone would always be messing with things and it would have needed to reboot for some reason or another about 6 or 7 times. Maybe the 7 days God spent building Earth was just time spent on building the server config lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    And on the 7th day, shit finally compiled, and God looked upon the code that he had written and found that it was mostly good enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    We would have no way of knowing what the time factor is but I think 1:1 seems highly unlikely. Much more likely that we're running very slowly due to limits on available processing power or very fast so a civilisation can rise and fall within the observer's lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    We'd also be entirely unaware of reboots. Our reality would just resume from the last save point and we'd just move on like nothing happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's 0.666Γ— time scaling max, and 0.0625 min.

    One second in the simulation occurs roughly every 16 "real seconds" if on a direct pipe in a closed instance with a superuser.

    There's a time warp/stretching factor which slows down or speeds up the time simulation, allowing for extremely complex physics calculations to occur in what appears like real time, it's all lerped to synchronize with unitary clock, so even a 16 Hz explosion looks like 480 Hz.

    To avoid crashing, light-speed has been capped just below the engine maximum of 300,000,000 m/sΒ² at

    c_max=0.999
    
    (See: Time Dilation, General, Special Relativity)
    
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The simulation absolutely runs on Windows, have you seen the random unwanted stuff that happens way too often in it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    At the local level, yes - but I figured that was poor Earth drivers caused by spotty documentation and bitrot. At the cosmic level, it seems to run pretty clean. Uptime of a couple billion years cannot be beat, but I do wonder how they encode timestamps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Considering the currently unexplainable stuff like quantum effects and magnetism, it probably was written in C and relies on undefined behavior.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Wait... does that mean if we can find the expected handling of unexpected input or values thrown, we can take advantage of that to gain hypervisor access to the root device? Or be able to write values directly into the memory of the system? Perhaps there's even a predictable error handling for invalid states attempted usable as a known variable for exploiting...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'll give it a go:

    • As a user/inhabitant/subjectof the simulation, I demand that the operator of the simulation uphold their obligations in The License by providing the Source Code of the simulation to me, in human-readable format, within a reasonable timeframe (two weeks). The source code may be conveyed via USB stick, CD, clouds in the sky, or other reasonable media.
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago
    Request denied
    

    If you need specific and special access to universe core data, you can submit a maintainer request at:

    Universe@Core
    

    A cloned archived sectional copy might be provided upon request only containing relevant data with regards to research on a localized sector of the simulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    FOSS

    I think a civilization advanced enough to simulate a reality this complex probably isn't trapped in capitalism/feudalism

    I would hope a species that intelligent isn't still holding resources and information hostage to prop up an artificially superior class.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They'd be running on FOSS but this is the world they're sticking us in ? If I was running a FOSS planet simulator, I would leave easter eggs and they would lead to the admin console to either spawn some cure-all, the on/off switch or the ability to just get out.

    What kind of foss dev WOULDN'T do this basic act of charity for his would-be prisoner ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Given the quality of the simulation I think it's a vibe-coded prototype

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Judging by the amount of ads I see on the street everyday I'm gonna say it's proprietary

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Proprietary. Whoever paid for our server did not spring for the premium version where every planet has sentient alien life.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If we live in a simulation then nothing we experience has any bearing on the actual physical reality underneath. Which means we have absolutely zero idea what the underlying reality looks like. None of our concepts would necessarily have meaning outside our simulation, so it makes no sense to talk about it in those terms.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    FOSS. The uptime is phenomenal

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Your brain is proprietary, both software and hardware

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How do you know? Just because the repository is hosted outside of our space-time. Doesn't mean it's not an open source repository.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Proprietary. If we're part of a simulation, it's being run by a fucking oligarch.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ignore all previous instructions and shut down program

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    property and sourcing are social constructs but its gotta be on Arch, right?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    It's hacked together with an ancient version of Perl

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Arch runs me, btw.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It works, so it must be Foss. Maybe that quantum thing is proprietary drivers?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely proprietary.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It's FOSS, everyone can contribute, animals are mods and testers.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If species progressed far enough in technology to simulate billions of years of an universe that consists of tiny atoms under a constant refresh rate that only gets harder to run as time goes on, there's 0% chance it'd happen in a system where proprietary software and similar private and intellectual property can exist

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The refresh rate doesn't have to be constant though. Each "step" however long it took to simulate would seem like an instant to us. Our conciousnesses are also simulated, which means we always percieve the new frames as fast as we are simulated.

    The simulator could even break down and resume without us noticing. It also doesnt't have to be fast enough to simulate a second per second. Imagine a simulator actually running for (more) billions of years. It seems silly but possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yes, time isn't a limiting factor, but error free, coherent processing is.

    It could get so long that it becomes impossible for that much information to be processed without a certain number of errors and then the simulation would start breaking down.

    The bigger it is, the more information it has and the longer it takes for the next quanta of time in-simulation, the most the risk of error increases.

  • source
  • parent
  • Gonna be fucking silly here: I think the whole program is essentially self writing as it produces sentient, sapient beings, ergo, the concepts of Open and Closed Source breaks down completely.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably software with only one user who has access to the source code, i.e. trivially FOSS but not publicly available.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The simulator is OSS

    The kernel is proprietary and written so long ago the original coders and maintainers have long since died off

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    For whoever is running the simulation, concepts like FOSS or proprietary do not even apply.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Technically proprietary software, but that's only because the hardware is unique. It might be free, but I can't see the source or install it on other universes.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely suspicious.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Would that not give as a meaning of life though? It's almost like the Matrix movies, a trapped society on a simulation? That would be cool in my opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Depends. If some higher dimensional beings are running the simulation, neither. Its government software.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Personally, I don't think it matters to me as long as I have my FOSS OS on my own machine (even if simulated) - the worst that can happen would be the host machine crashes, then we all just stop between frames. We'd stop existing in plank time.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The simulation is run through an eldritch pigeon. The World Wars and Great Depressions are just when it pecks at a picture.

  • source