Framework + valve collaborating to release half-life 3 as a platform exclusive, confirmed!
post
Considering the Steam Deck is not a deck, and the Valve Index is not an index, I’m assuming this is not a frame.
Oh wait, Steam Controller.
Steam Machine was a 10/10 name for an unfortunately failed product :(
Frames -> Glasses -> new VR headset?
PS: Whatever you call it, please Steam Controller 2, it's been too long 🥲
I'm sure a new VR headset would still use the Index name. AR glasses maybe, but I doubt it.
I'm personally speculating something like xr glasses with game streaming ability and the ability to connect to some kind of controller.
Agreed.
But I get a strong feeling it is going to be all-in-one like the Quest. Computer and Battery are on the headset.
Deck Verified to now extend to VR titles through this new device. Frame Verified.
I wish. I like the idea of a standalone headset but I'm not exactly thrilled to give Meta any money...
Maybe a self-hosted gaming computer rack via which one Steam Links to Steam Decks around the house, give them a lot more compute capability. :-)
Hmmm. I was thinking since sort of flat screen that masquerades as a picture frame. Maybe an AIO device for game streaming.
Seems like we're getting one step close to a full fledge SteamOS. I'm guessing they want to sell pre-builts before releasing the OS?
My guess would be they don't want to spend a lot of effort supporting arbitrary hardware before they're ready. Honestly, I don't get why everyone is so obsessed with it. There are excellent dedicated distro maintainers that provide the same feature set SteamOS will provide —or something more suitable to your taste even. If you have a Deck then great, keep running SteamOS. If not, there are potentially better options for you already.
Honestly I'm ecstatic to see more Valve hardware. They're setting the target for hardware for game developers which means a better experience for us all.
PC Game Developers will know they need to get they're game running on deck (and now FRAME) if they want to hit the maximum size audience. Nvidia currently owns PC gaming but they're not good stewards of the PC gaming ecosystem anymore (nor is Microsoft).
-
I really have no interest in title's that beg me to run buggy builds on a $2000 graphics card that is less than 2 years old to be "playable". (Looking squarely at unreal engine 5 games)
-
I have no interest in GPUs that cost 200% the cost of the rest of the PC.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
I want AMD apus to dominate the space. I want Linux to empower them. I am tired and TBH my next gaming PC is going to end up running Kazeta.org at this rate.
Thank you for coming to my TEDex talk
I just looked up Kazeta.org and it looks like a gaming console with extra steps. It looks cool, but the amount of effort needed to build a physical collection of carts is so tedious that I would have spent better time simply purchasing a gaming console because they are always plug- and- play
I just think it's neat!
I have no interest in GPUs that cost 200% the cost of the rest of the PC.
Well, CPUs have come down in price because they just aren't advancing in performance that quickly any more; serial compute hasn't improved that much. If you charge much for a modern processor, people will just use an older one. Parallel compute improvements has kept going, and thus GPUs aren't under that kind of pressure from physical limitations.
Is parallel computing the future? >.>
Well, unless we make new physics breakthroughs, serial computing improvements have slowed down a lot and are just limited in how much further we can push it. Kinda makes parallel computing the future by default, at least for problems that can be parallelized. Might not be tomorrow or next year, but over time, yeah, I expect a general shift towards parallelization. That's not a huge surprise
I mean, I think that it isn't very controversial to say that we expected that to probably ultimately happen at some point, just didn't know exactly when.
For a while, I’ve also just wanted to use igpus since my gaming demands are not that extreme, but they were enough that older igpus couldn’t handle it. The steam deck was the first machine that could do it for me.
Unless I want to start running ai models in my home, I’ll skip the gpu.
Valve is building psychic robots remote piloted by orphans.
AMD field detected! Pattern orange!
If this is like a SteamOS desktop I am down. My 2080 TI is still going just fine though.
Steam machines was a better name to be honest. I'm sad that effort withered and died.
Maybe they will use the stream machines name as an umbrella term for all their “consoles”. I like that name too.
I'd say more effort went into the software which sets us up for where we are now where a great deal of PC games is already compatible making this a must buy for playing the massive libraries that everyone has been amassing since 2003. If it can boot Plasma Bigscreen or if Steam Big Picture gets more entertainment apps like Netflix, it will be a home entertainment juggernaut.
Is there a reason valve calls all their products "steam something" as opposed to "valve something" ?
I would guess it's to indicate heavy association with the Steam client/service. Valve could make other products (I know they're working on human brain interface stuff), but if it's called "Steam..." you can easily identify it's in the gaming line for use with Steam.
A Valve is a mechanism used to regulate and control the release of Steam?
pls be deckard pls be deckard pls be deckard
Steam Fream™️
I'm pretty sure this is for an AI robot that is meant to play our backlog games for us
My bet is a new cloud gaming platform.
Would they really? Feels like that market is pretty saturated already. Unless they do something unique with it. But then again it would be great for the steam deck.
saturated
steam
cloud
ha
I have nothing to add I'm just loopy and thought it was funny
They already have the tech for it nearly perfected. Most of the time I play a Steam game now, I’m playing through my phone, tablet, or AppleTV. It’s fantastic.
Only thing that sucks is the Steam link app locks you out of the store and friends functionality (I believe to comply with Apple restrictions). Locking friends straight up breaks multiplayer in a few games.
I don't think steam link is perfect as a frequent user, there's lots of connectivity issues
Probably very dependent on your setup. I have high speed fiber, so the performance is great either at home or remote.
If you don’t have a great connection, or your upload speed is limited by the ISP, your experience won’t be great. But maybe that’s what Steam frame is going to address?
I'm on fiber as well but using wifi on the remote machine
Why would your internet connection matter for something that runs on LAN?
I'm glad that Steam Link works for you. Meanwhile I gave up on it and decided to just lug my 50LB desktop from room to room instead, because doing so is considerably less of a hassle than putting up with Steam Link and its constant lagging, disconnects, dropouts, FPS dips, and input lag. It's so fucking bad that I can't believe that people actually still use it as more than just a neat novelty for five minutes at a time.
"Saturated"? Seriously? How so? I can't think of a single cloud gaming platform that didn't fail miserably. Nobody can seem to be able to make a competitive service. There's a massive gap that needs to be filled.
Uh, GeForce Now? Xbox gamepass/cloud? Amazon Luna? Probably more. And if others fail I assume because there isn't enough demand. (except for stadia, that's just failed because Google gets a hard on for canceling projects). Now I haven't bothered with cloud gaming since OnLive. So I don't know how good any of these are. They probably can be improved on. But to say there are none? Nah.
Sounds kinda dumb, ngl. But if they come out with some decent hardware, I won't mind.
top 81 comments