I must peer review this research.
post
I’m not opposed to this kind of research. Something interesting may come out of it. But, the only brewers I can imagine using this information would be the large mass-market beers that are mostly crap.
This feels like min-maxing the marketing of beer. It has fuck-all to do with the essential things about beer—taste and alcohol—and only serves to make something pretty in an ad.
Is that really the end game for beer? I like seeing the head and all but I’m kinda glad when it dissipates.
Thick beer foam research is flourishing, but thick thigh research has been stagnating since the 70s.
Japan really likes it's foam (7:3 beer to foam is considered best). They even have cans where most of the top pops off and it foams up to a head (I hate those). I was always the guy who would order it without foam at my local. One of the half-Japanese staff was the same. I don't care for the texture (and younger, poorer me didn't care for what I saw as a waste of money). The only good thing I've heard is it can keep the beer fresher in the glass for longer, but I was never a slow drinker.
Sooooo, if we drink more beer, we get more head???
I can see where you're coming foam, but no
I can beerly stand that dad joke
It's an acquired taste, sometimes the joke needs time to ferment
It was good for a groan at the very yeast
There is something beautiful about learning something new about something that is so old as beer.
all 16 comments