1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
26 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 207 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This was legitimately fascinating. It’s crazy that Bloomberg reported on the same issue and didn’t find anything. Their reporters are terrible at their jobs or were prevented from doing them properly. Either way Bloomberg looks inept or corrupt.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It’s not that surprising that an outlet that makes its entire living on a certain segment of the economy would do a better job in that segment than generalist journalists.

    If you’ve ever seen a news article about something you have real world expertise in, you know what I mean. Every time this happens to me I’m like “but they’re giving it such a surface treatment, missing the real point, and getting lots of little things wrong.”

    Then I turn to the next article and read it like it’s gospel. It’s a cognitive dissonance I don’t know how to deal with except by becoming an expert in everything, which is impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I hate to bring up AI, but this is exactly what I keep trying to explain to people - when you ask any of these bots questions about things you're an expert in, you see all the flaws. The trouble is people tend not to ask questions about things they already know...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Since we first got easy access to various LLMs, I've been doing the opposite, asking obscure questions I know the answer to, trying to get a better understanding of what various models are really (not) capable of, and what data they're (not) trained on, but it seems that you're right and I'm in a minority. Most people treat the only LLM they know of as an oracle, and don't seem to understand that it can write with confidence and still be incorrect. I've seen countless examples of just that, some funnier than other, so to me it has always been very obvious. It's possible that using GPT-2 (back in the talktotransformer days), which was not configured for chat-style conversation but rather just to generate a continuation to the user's input text, has actually helped me understand LLMs better and avoid using them in that common naive way, but I'm not sure how to make it just as clear to everyone else...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    What bugs me the most is I've pointed it out to people in conversations that basically go like this:

    Me: You used it for X and caught mistakes - why are you trusting it for Y? Them: That's a good point.

    And then they keep doing it anyway.

    I'm not an AI hater at all - it can be a great way to accelerate work you are capable of doing on your own. But using it for things you don't understand, and/or not double checking its work is insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I tried to use an LLM to write a script for me. It confidently told me I could split a string in OpenSCAD with the [1:] operator. It works in Python, but isn't an OpenSCAD feature.

    Fortunately, programming has a good way of letting you know when the LLM is completely wrong.

    The worrying part is that the LLMs can sometimes produce code that runs, but has massive security issues that you don't notice if you just run the code and don't closely analyse it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    I've had it on loop (on a muted tab) for the past 2 days.

    starshipTroopersImDoingMyPart.gif

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    I never even thought about data smuggling. China isn't allowed to buy Nvidia GPUs? Ok then China will have someone maintain the Nvidia servers in another country and remote into it to run their AI models.

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Edit: OP corrected the link. Please support Gamer's Nexus.

    This is a re-upload by a third party. Which is perfectly acceptable, but do note it's not back up on Gamer's Nexus' page.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 45 points 1 year ago*

    Oops, thanks, I was watching it on my phone and grabbed the wrong link from Duckduckgo. I've corrected the link to point to their video.

    Note that it is back up - I'm watching it on their channel on my phone right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Could only watch the first 10-15 mins, they've definitely upped the production value. I reckon I'll have to buy some merch from them to support them because this is good shit and want to see more.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'll shill for them - if you play DND, the dice set is sick. Nice wooden case too (but the fit is a little jank, the lids don't sit flush). Still, it's an eye pleaser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Already watched it when it came out, I guess I'll play it in the background while I work, muted, to help the algorithm.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    4:30 in and I'm hooked. Gotta save it for later.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Hell yeah! Make sure to download it for preservation reasons as well.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    It was up in Odysee all this time.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/games@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    They got mad, that's how you know it slegit. Literally better than any 5 star review.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Fuck Bloomberg. All my homies hate Bloomberg.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Really fun watch. I probably am more aware of this than most so most of the contextual information was "common sense" or "open secrets", but never really saw anyone put it that clearly or blatantly before. And the technical segments (building a frankenboard) were awesome.

    Although one thing me and a few buddies keep wondering but are too afraid to ask legal about: Did Steve actually film himself committing a crime when he bought the card? Like, he as a US citizen is a party that can buy one of those and as long as he didn't give it to anyone else, it is no different than buying and shipping a card from a less than reputable source. But it also raises every single export control flag in my head.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Edit: OP corrected the link. Please support Gamer's Nexus.

    This is a re-upload by a third party. Which is perfectly acceptable, but do note it's not back up on Gamer's Nexus' page.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Oops, thanks, I was watching it on my phone and grabbed the wrong link from Duckduckgo. I've corrected the link to point to their video.

    Note that it is back up - I'm watching it on their channel on my phone right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    My conclusion is that the US is getting what it wants out of the importation block regardless of smuggling or "fell of the assembly line".

    Universities (China and the US) want a warranty on that hardware. They can't get a warranty on smuggled hardware. That's where you would have researchers building models. The GPUs they have are getting old and they don't have replacements lined up.

    The other place to build models is corporations, who might choose to ignore the warranty issue, but they can't possibly get enough high end GPUs to actually do that. Not while using mules who can only bring in one or two at a time. Maybe they can find a way to smuggle things en masse, but they'd likely just make themselves a target to US trade authorities.

    That leaves Chinese gamers as the only ones who want smuggled GPUs at all. US trade policy doesn't give a shit about them.

    So yes, there's smuggling, Nvidia certainly knows about it, US trade authorities certainly know about it, but nobody has any reason to care.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Shit I just posted this without seeing your post. Deleting 🥲

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/hardware@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    FYI, the YouTube algorithm positively freaks out when you watch a video below 1x speed because of the increased watchtime.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • 1 comment in c/documentaries@lemmy.cafe view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Why isn't this on peerube?

  • source