top 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 247 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Full country for those interested

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah! Thanks. I was shouting "Zoom out! Zoom out!" at my screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    It is a very thick but even taller strip of land.

    The point of reference for it's thinness shouldn't be it's own height, but rather the sizes of countries in general.

    I mean, it's still be thin, but the UK has no place throwing stones from within that glass house lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I feel like this is stretching the definition of "thin" to make sure nobody feels insecure about the proportions of the land claimed by local government.

    What are we doing here, folks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is.

    Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice.

    Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 133 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Looking at a map, Chile is a thin strip of land compared to all other South American countries, which is what makes sense to do because it makes it easily identifiable to everyone when they also look at a map.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Exactly! Just like on the map of Scandinavia, you could call Sweden and Norway the shaft and Demark the ejaculate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    If Scandinavia looks like a cock to you, then yes. But you might want to see a doctor it your cock looks like the outline of Norway and Sweden...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sweden is clearly the cock and Finland the balls. Norway is only for Klingons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago

    Well they're not wrong

    It's enormous, but relatively speaking, a thin strip, yeah

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago*

    John Oliver on The Bugle podcast had the best description of its shape. “Chile. The country most likely to crack if baked into a biscuit.”

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    An interesting comparison is Canada. Chile is about as long as Canada is wide, and most of Canada lives within a short distance of the US border, so the population distribution is similar to Chile's.

    Chile rotated east-west instead of north-south superimposed over Canada

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure this is malintended

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And the BBC is headquartered on a damp rock.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It’s 2600 miles/4200km long. It’s 2300 miles NYC to Los Angeles, for perspective.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    You mean the media outlet from the insignificant island in the North Sea?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    thin is a good description honestly, Snow in the Andes by the morning, and beach by the afternoon.

    I like it here 10/10, would be born here again.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It is a relatively thin strip of land. I drove down the Carretera Austral a few years ago, you even have to drive through Argentina, because there are the sea and mountains and not enough space to "fit" a highway (alternatively you could take the ferry).

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm sorry, but at no point does Chile get too thin to fit a highway. It is just that part meets a gulf and wildlife territory. They are all national parks. The alternative (to going into Argentina or the ferry) would be to deforest hundreds of hectares and blow up mountains just so tourists get an scenic car ride (that is already pretty scenic and spectacular as it is).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's why I put the "fit" in quotes. There is no space for a highway because of gulf, mountains and national parks, and that is a good thing.

    If it was wider they would have built a highway for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I get what you meant. But it would be more apt to say that they don't want a highway there, it's not like it wouldn't fit if they wanted. The whole thing is a biosphere reserve, new infrastructure is not allowed. It has nothing to do with the geographical wideness of Chile. To only have a ferry there is a choice. Bypassing through Argentina actually skips a good third of the official highway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What are you talking about? Chile gets wider at the bottom...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Somos el mejor país de Chile CTM!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Now show the population density

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Viva chile mierda!

  • source
  • At least call it a banana due to earth's curvature

  • source