Full country for those interested

Full country for those interested

Looking at a map, Chile is a thin strip of land compared to all other South American countries, which is what makes sense to do because it makes it easily identifiable to everyone when they also look at a map.
Exactly! Just like on the map of Scandinavia, you could call Sweden and Norway the shaft and Demark the ejaculate.
If Scandinavia looks like a cock to you, then yes. But you might want to see a doctor it your cock looks like the outline of Norway and Sweden...
I saw a doctor in Amsterdam about it and he slid me €20 and kept saying, "I'm a real doctor". They really do things differently in Europe!
Sweden is clearly the cock and Finland the balls. Norway is only for Klingons.
Brazil is south America shaped, which is Africa shaped. The other way is Rio Grande do Sul that is Brazil shaped and a Brazilian state
Looks like a fried chicken thigh. Though a lot of things could look like fried chicken pieces.
Fun fact, Brazil has about the same length on the N-S as the E-W directions.
You can't notice this looking at most maps.
Well they're not wrong
It's enormous, but relatively speaking, a thin strip, yeah
John Oliver on The Bugle podcast had the best description of its shape. “Chile. The country most likely to crack if baked into a biscuit.”
An interesting comparison is Canada. Chile is about as long as Canada is wide, and most of Canada lives within a short distance of the US border, so the population distribution is similar to Chile's.

I'm not sure this is malintended
And the BBC is headquartered on a damp rock.
As a Brit… … yeah actually
Yeah this is 100% correct. Today it's a damp and humid rock.
Wish I was on some far off thin strip of land, if I'm honest.
It’s 2600 miles/4200km long. It’s 2300 miles NYC to Los Angeles, for perspective.
thin is a good description honestly, Snow in the Andes by the morning, and beach by the afternoon.
I like it here 10/10, would be born here again.
It is a relatively thin strip of land. I drove down the Carretera Austral a few years ago, you even have to drive through Argentina, because there are the sea and mountains and not enough space to "fit" a highway (alternatively you could take the ferry).
I'm sorry, but at no point does Chile get too thin to fit a highway. It is just that part meets a gulf and wildlife territory. They are all national parks. The alternative (to going into Argentina or the ferry) would be to deforest hundreds of hectares and blow up mountains just so tourists get an scenic car ride (that is already pretty scenic and spectacular as it is).
That's why I put the "fit" in quotes. There is no space for a highway because of gulf, mountains and national parks, and that is a good thing.
If it was wider they would have built a highway for sure.
I get what you meant. But it would be more apt to say that they don't want a highway there, it's not like it wouldn't fit if they wanted. The whole thing is a biosphere reserve, new infrastructure is not allowed. It has nothing to do with the geographical wideness of Chile. To only have a ferry there is a choice. Bypassing through Argentina actually skips a good third of the official highway.
What are you talking about? Chile gets wider at the bottom...
top 54 comments