cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34331173

Politicians in the Bay Area want to remove bike lanes from the Richmond-San Rafael bridge because they are worried about traffic congestion.

Cyclists say removing these bike lanes will put them in danger.

https://richmondside.org/2025/08/05/richmond-san-rafael-bridge-bike-path-final-vote/

https://bikeeastbay.org/rsr2024-2/

During the public hearing, commissioner Karl Hasz was spotted driving his car

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

stop removing bike lanes, start removing car lanes

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The worst part is they didn’t even remove a car lane for this. There’s literally no reason to remove it and the data prove it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Spite. Many people are no more emotionally advanced than a toddler. They're mad about something (traffic, the looming spectre of mortality, queer people, being out of shape, whatever) so they lash out at whatever. Bike lanes are a symbol of things they don't like, and easier to attack than the real sources of their unhappiness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is it wide enough to ge another lane for cars? Would that actually reduce traffic at all?

    Im not anti-car, but is there any benefit to this? It seems really unlikely

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    While it is wide enough, it would be counterproductive for traffic flow to allow vehicular traffic there. The bridge currently has 2 lanes, and the highway beyond is also two lanes -- so having a 3rd lane on the bridge would just lead to a zipper-merge situation that would back traffic up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    California Carbrain Overload!

  • source
  • 130 comments in c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world view that post