Isn't that illegal now?

Absolutely nothing at all could be wrong in this, right?

Ewwwwwww!!!!!

The image generator will also make photorealistic pictures of children upon request, but thankfully refuses to animate them inappropriately, despite the “spicy” option still being available. You can still select it, but in all my tests, it just added generic movement.

So it does know theres a line to cross somewhere…

everyday I thank myself for being too shut-in to post pictures of myself online

Musk offered to father her children. This was probably done deliberately.

https://archive.is/QTpGe because its either pay walled or needs an account

Gross.

Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros

Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.

I wonder if grok could make some distasteful Elon deepfakes.

So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revelation ?

I appreciate Grok for being the platonic ideal AI system. Not like these others that get little guardrails and tweaks added every time a news article hits about some inevitable fucked up output it can produce. Just pure unrefined donkey shit. 🤌

"... for science" - reporter

That picture is uncanny.

How is AI not buried under piles of lawsuits?

At what point do these artists (read labels) start suing for defamation (read loss of profits).

Groki is Elon, this is the proof.

Man the unstable diffusion users must have lost their collective minds

That's not fair