top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago
[+] 241 points 1 year ago* (28 children)
  • [–] [S] 132 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It’s 4chan speak, I’ve seen it before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    While I can understand his syntax, I fail to understand the substance of that sentence.

    Now I'm curious how wealth can be utilized in a manner that pertains to African-Americans. Funding sickle cell anemia research?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think he is basically saying "I think that black people are bad. I also think that some billionaires are bad, but it's #notallbillionaires . The innate badness that black people have and the bad billionaires have are the same, so I am going to call the bad billionaires black". In other words, racist bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    His "exceptions" are clearly the guy who can't get through a press conference without rolling on molly (and has dozens of illegitimate children) the guy who talks with a vocal fry and practices "concerned face" in the mirror because he thinks it fools people into thinking he isn't Patrick Bateman, and the guy who injects the blood of young people and gets stumped when the interviewer asks him if the human race should survive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't think that's a neologism. It's just the adjective to 'negro'.

    Basically he thinks billionaires are 'behaving black'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    no, it's not even a word. that wouldn't even be the adjective to that word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    no, it’s not even a word.

    It is though.

    that wouldn’t even be the adjective to that word.

    You are right there though. I'm not a native English speaker and thought that would be it. (Sounds like if I'd try to build that adjective in my native language though).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    that's not the word I'm talking about. I'm saying the supposed adjective is not a word. it's not your fault that you were confused as i said "word" twice referring to different things the Spanish word and the supposed adjective. it's just that i really don't want to type any of it so i said "that word" instead not thinking it would be confusing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -78 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    A n*gger is a race neutral term nowadays

    no. no it's not. people know its origins and who it's referring to. to deny this is a form of sealioning. fuck off with that

    It essentially means someone that takes far more than they will ever contribute, and in that respect, he's absolutely correct

    attaching this meaning to it is a form of dog whistle to get people to associate these traits with Black people. you are doing the propaganda work of white supremacy right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    supremaCISM

    "White supremacy" is what they think is the case. "White supremacism" is what they practice by thinking it.

    Sorry for pedantry but this is one of those things that drives me nuts, similar to "my grandpa is on Facebook with all his conspiracies". NO. A conspiracy is real. A conspiracy THEORY is when a bunch of idiots think there's a conspiracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Dunno, I once got told that you can use the word if you're black, LOL =\

    And if I'd use it to address a bunch of friends whose ancestors weren't slaves and who are not black, I think this wouldn't be an insult. If there's a black person nearby, I won't risk it having a different effect though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No it doesn't. People have all kinds of perceptions of words. Get used to it, nobody is going to follow your whim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Buddy, you're not a normal person and nothing in this conversation says I'm a racist.

    You're an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    I don't know what racist town you're from, but that is not reality no matter how much racists wish it was. As for a name for people who take more than anyone could ever deserve, we simply call them billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Woof, you realize that the episode of South Park you morons use to justify this "change in meaning" was satire, and was not meant to be a guide for how to use cognitive dissonance to change words' meanings to your own liking.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 141 points 1 year ago* (20 children)
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I find it funny how bad guys in fiction openly expresses that they’re in the dark side. That’s so comical it can’t happen in reality. Right?

    Nah, this guy is embracing ”Dark Enlightenment” as his core philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    You start out thinking that the fictional one-dimensional villains are realistic as a kid

    Then you grow up and realize that they were just intentionally overdone hyperbole

    Then you grow up even more and realize that the fictional one-dimensional villains are very real

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    If you dig deep, Nick Land (coiner of the term “Dark Enlightenment”) draws a lot of influence from Bataille - and specifically fucked up shit written by Bataille. He’s got an article all about the philosophy of the “Story of the Eye” which is basically snuff erotica.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    “He has defended the institution of slavery, and has suggested that certain races may be more naturally inclined toward servitude than others.[3][18] He has argued that whites have inherently higher IQs than black people,[18] and opposes U.S. civil rights programs.[19]”

    holy fucking hell

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    and has suggested that certain races may be more naturally inclined toward servitude

    Never his race though, that'd be silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That limitation actually doesn't exist. If someone is racist primarily against some group nearby, they may think that some group further from them is better than their own.

    Like some Eastern Europeans thinking they are better than Middle-Eastern people, but that Western Europeans are better than them.

    In case of that guy - he surely feels right at home in USA where all this is reduced to "White", "Black" and "Asian". OK, Middle-Eastern people are sometimes "White" and sometimes "Brown". Jewish people are usually classified as "White", which is very convenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you get deep into their subcultures, they get really nitpicky. There are comics where Italians are depicted with the kind of racist features they give to Black people, because some of the people don’t believe that Italians count as white.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Yarvin has been described as a "neo-reactionary", "neo-monarchist" and "neo-feudalist"

    I've seen this for hardcore libertarian. They have one of the most unhinged subreddits. Their mod Derpballz was rather prolific is showing up to random communities with that BS. Bro is currently ban evasion as Irresolution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "neo-monarchist" "hardcore libertarian" I love it when people have coherent views which aren't self-contradictory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    There's a version of libertarianism where if you rightfully (via all-voluntary process) own a piece of land and make a kingdom there, or create a network of agreements leading to monarchy, it's fine.

    The issue is that you can never own territory fully logically rightfully by even Rothbard, so you only can have a voluntary monarchy without territory cause territory is inherently commonly owned, or owned by nobody. A group of people needing some territory to live on can claim as much as they need, but one person who wants to have a kingdom on it - nah. And a voluntary monarchy is not much different from a BDSM orgy, you can have it right now if everybody agrees.

    So bog standard ancap is incompatible with this, but there are a few kinds of fascists (or "paleo-libertarians") who have a set of ideas which isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Mississippi's Letter of Secession on slavery:

    Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    (I read the tweet)

    Mother of God...

    (I read his Wikipedia page)

    Oh, this is actually mild by his standards, my goodness...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Can we please go back to a time when psychos like this guy were largely irrelevant?

    I hate the internet sometimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    They were more numerous and loud when they were largely irrelevant.

    But the times were nice, yes.

    But - I've looked for Urbit and it's interesting. It's very close to what I'd consider useful.

    IMHO a p2p system of the future should work as one user group being one democratically controlled system (like OS with its resources and entities) with computation and storage distributed between member nodes. The reason I'm not too interested in that idea is that it's about global Internet and global availability. Today delay-tolerant offline-enabled applications seem more historically relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I... what does that even mean?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 1 year ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fascinating. I never understood why the cuckolding fetish (fixation? obsession?) came with such a strong overlap with, I guess, race play? Feels like a charitable way to put it.

    I didn't believe it at first, but any quick web search will show that cuckolding largely is about the races of the people involved.

    Which makes a lot more sense if seen through the framework you just described.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sure, yeah, but none of that explains what billionaires being "negrous" means? Like something something connect them with the same negative attributes that they keep going on about?

    Can white billionaires be "negrous"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I know I'm an idiot, but I actually still don't understand it.

    So there is no black people, that are billionaires. So that is not a problem. But he wants there to be a problem. So he just says that they act black. Which is a problem.

    ?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    ok I'm going to TRY to explain his thinking but I'm likely going to come off as racist trying to explain it.

    What he's saying is there are those who earned their wealth via hard work and all that other bullshit and others that just got it handed to them or give off the impression that they're insanely wealthy when "they're not".

    this is what he likely means when he says "n-word rich". Because this morons impression of wealth in the Black community is via watching music videos and watching reality TV. He's watched way too many youtube vids about such and such Black music artist or athlete who wears all this "bling" has all these cars and a huge mansion with nothing in it but meanwhile said person is broke. that's what he means by "n-word rich".

    he could have just said "The problem is the majority of billionaires aren't actually billionaires. They just think they are."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That's what I thought he was saying at first, but that still doesn't even make any sense though. You are either a billionaire or you are not. I don't know of anyone who goes around claiming to be a billionaire when they are not, and I could probably name a few who are but never mention it.

    Also why would it be a problem? Is he saying there is not enough of a wealth gap? That's demonstrably false.

    And what's with the nature and function bit?

    Sounds to me he's just spouting hatred to be provocative without any real point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    No idea. I do think billionaires are a serious problem and shouldn't be allowed. Dont care how many business they start. They have the power to buy elections and play games with our entire world so fuck em.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    How is it that the weirdest dudes keep ending up with so much power and influence. Like, this is just bigoted shit obviously, but it's weird bigoted shit. What is it about people that makes them look at a weirdo freak (derogatory) like this and think "this is a man I need to have direct the entirety of my belief system going forward"?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Success is awarded to the confident. You can be an absolute weird idiot and still, in the right circumstances, get massive success just because people assume there's a reason you seem so confident, and who are they to second guess that confidence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think a part of it is you have to be weird to want to chase power. Normal people aren't thinking 24/7 about how they can leap frog their way into power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    The other part is that normal people as party of a well functioning society need to actively maintain systems that keep fuckwits from accumulation to much power, and we haven't been doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I’m middle aged now, but I have to admit, while I’ve always known there was racism still around, and still part of the government. I’m blown away though at just how much more of it, and how deeply rooted it is. The kind of people in charge right now are literal cartoon villains when I was a kid.

    I mean that literally.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’m blown away though at just how much more of it, and how deeply rooted it is.

    Same. Same. I'm feeling like I must live in a bubble (nobody around me is like that) and also that it was also always there, they're just more comfortable taking their masks off right now. It's depressing.

    On the flip side though the people I have around me are mostly family and my kids. I have zero social time beyond that at the moment. Two of my kids besties are not white so I'm at least absolutely sure I'm raising my kids to not be racist pieces of shit. It's something.

    I genuinely expected that tweet to be a "you had me in the first half". Like the naggers scene in south park. Fuck that guy. Absolute filth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Nah, blatant racism isn't much a thing anymore. It's the systemic racism that is turning out sticky.

    I'm in the South and haven't heard N, or any other slur, in ages. Confederate flags are rare enough to make my blood boil when I see one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well that's heartening. Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's not as bad as social media makes out. I've seen more racism in Manhattan and Chicago than down here.

    When I moved to the South, black people often gave me the evil eye. Never had that happen before! Really woke to how angry they must feel when hit with random, senseless racism.

    Anyway, haven't felt that in almost 20-years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is that real?! I remember them poking fun at Trump now and again as he was a national laughing stock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Yes, there was a whole running narrative about bill the cat having his brain replaced with trumps back in the 80’s. my now completely crazy, maga dad, turned me on to bloom county as a kid so most of my politics likely took root with a large nosed penguin and his friends. Then when I hit high school, I found rage against the machine.

    But yeah, I never watched any of his reality shows, this is the turnip I knew, until he became the actual president. My brain has not recovered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›