Show transcriptScreenshot of a Tumblr post by nongunktional:

when i first heard about the male loneliness epidemic i was like oh yeah close camaraderie and bonding between men is often discouraged in favor of competition or, if not discouraged, at least filtered through a lens of individualism that precludes deep connections. and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid) to which i say skill issue

to all the men out there not getting laid: try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence

top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 205 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I found a local private club where drinks are cheap and there’s tons of regular customers. Feels like what the Cheers bar seemed like on TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It’s pretty great. Everyone is really chill and if you just want to find a comfy chair and read you can do that, too.

    I can’t wait for football season, not because I particularly like football, but because I like watching football with everybody.

    And a few drinks and a couple appetizers are like $60, tops.

    Oh, and the bartenders know your favorite drink and will just start making it when you walk in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And the stereo, quieter or louder than the ass end of a 727?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Loud enough to hear but quiet enough to talk to someone across the bar.

    And it’s got one of those jukeboxes where you can pick the song and there’s not many people so you’ve got a good chance of hearing it.

    And folks who aren’t there will pick a song to let their friends know they’re thinking about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -25 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    third places are dead

    I've heard this line quite a few times. But... as far as I can tell, camping is still absolutely a popular past time. Parks and beaches are still a thing. Gyms and bars and clubs are as crowded as ever.

    This reads much more like a meme than reality.

    There are people who are off the deep end, yes, but the answer isn’t to attack them like this.

    There's a lot of mass media that's screaming at people about how women and men are natural enemies and the only path to intimacy is through sexual assault.

    Absolutely attack this ideology. Drag your friends back from it if you can. Mock and deride the notion if you can't. Don't tolerate the intolerable.

    there really are huge societal problems that are resulting in people withdrawing, which is obviously bad for their mental health

    Absolutely. So throw a party. Invite people out to do things. Mix and mingle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago*

    Dead isn’t precise enough. Expensive is generally what they mean. Along with many free spaces being dead.

    Having to spend money to socialize is a concern for many. Often times this is a lack of a car too. Or lack of public transportation. Sprawl, Stroads.

    It’s a multi variate thing when people quip that third places are dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Mocking and deriding people is very effective at radicalizing them, please do not do that, it consistently makes the problem worse.

    I get that they would deserve that behaviour if they are advocating sexual assault, but if you care about that person, or the cultural issues they're succumbing to, or the rising sentiment that men have to be rapey to ever have success with women, please don't do that, it's detrimental to the cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Mocking and deriding people is very effective at radicalizing them

    To your side, certainly. That's how hazing works. Exploiting people's insecurities by calling them cucks and betas while presenting a facade of success and popularity is the Andrew Tate Special.

    Piercing that bubble and outing fanatics as weirdos is necessary if you want to break their grip. If you're tolerating abhorrent behavior - or, God forbid, rewarding it - you're reinforcing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    The key point here, however, is that exploiting insecurities through insults is not the only thing that Andrew Tate does.

    He simultaneously messages to young men that they are weak/poor/unhealthy/cucks/betas/etc, but also that they deserve more, that it's not entirely their fault that they're not getting rich/women/success/etc, and that if they do xyz, they'll fix themselves. Solely insulting them isn't what makes the messaging effective, it's the putting down of their current position in life while simultaneously promising a solution through notions of them having things like sex or money "taken" from them.

    It's certainly okay to mock or insult ideologies that are harmful, and to do a bit of that to the people that promote them, but only doing that will only radicalize them away from you. Think about these 2 scenarios:

    Scenario A: "You're worthless, you'll never be anything, you're poor, a virgin, and will die alone"

    Scenario B: "You're worthless, you're poor, a virgin, and you'll never be anything unless you follow these x steps to become a better man"

    Scenario B is what Andrew Tate uses on young men. Scenario A is pure harassment that doesn't motivate anybody on its own, Scenario B motivates action.

    If you just ridicule a friend that has negative beliefs and don't present any alternative, they will stop being your friend. If you deride them for sharing a harmful belief, then explain the alternative and how it would make them better off, you're more likely to get them to actually change. (though this is, of course, not universal, and I'm sure a small subset of people could be motivated to change purely off insults and nothing more)

    I hope I explained that well, I'm quite prone to rambling 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That sounds like an extremely good way to ensure they cling even tighter to the lies sold by the Tates of the world

    Antagonism is extremely effective at shutting people off from change. If you antagonize someone and they actually change, they almost certainly could have been better reached through compassion.

    And when, like the vast majority of people exposed to antagonism, they don't? You have now convinced them anyone outside their bubble is unreasonable and cruel, and given them a sense of persecution they will reflexively hide behind any time they're confronted with an outside perspective

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That sounds like an extremely good way to ensure they cling even tighter to the lies sold by the Tates of the world

    That's because you've bought into the right wing propaganda. The endless campaign to coddle fascists has only ever produced more fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Holy, this thread is a mess. If you think all men who struggle dating are fascists, this conversation ends here. If you accept the fact that not every man not in a relationship is a fascist, then we can talk. More specifically, we can talk about how the point isn't to "coddle fascists", but rather to not antagonize new men into the arms of Andrew Tate and others.

    Is someone with social anxiety, therefore struggles dating, a fascist? You might know a far-right socially anxious guy, sure, but that doesn't prove anything beyond the fact that this one person is a fascist. I'm not sure how it's right wing propaganda to say that generalization is bad. But I'm also not sure whether you realize an issue (in this case, men struggle with relationships) can have more than one cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you think all men who struggle dating are fascists

    No idea where you got that. But I do see a lot of fascists who alienate women as friends and partners, then grow resentful when they don't receive "respect" they feel they deserve.

    This can quickly escalate into stalking and further violence against family or ex-partners, unless other people intervene.

    The idea that a violent misogynist shouldn't be argued with or deterred, because their sense of superiority is more important than anyone else's safety is what's brought us to the modern fascist moment.

    Is someone with social anxiety, therefore struggles dating, a fascist?

    If "social anxiety" means lashing out at women in order to force them to comply with your demands?

    Absolutely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    You know that's not what I mean by social anxiety. Even the fact that you put it in quotation marks makes it sound like you don't believe anxiety can be a genuine reason to have never dated. I have social anxiety. I am a man. I've never dated. Therefore, you will now assume I'm a fascist who hates women, stalks women, is violent towards women. You will also assume that my social anxiety (or "social anxiety", as you say) is a lie, a cover for the way you assume I act.

    I'm not making excuses for actual fascists or actual men who do the things you mentioned above. I am, however, against this idea that men who struggle dating MUST do those things because there's, supposedly, no other explanation. Do the men you describe exist? Sure. Attacking any men not in a relationship is where I draw the line.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 119 points 1 year ago (35 children)

    I mean it also does mean the first thing tho no?

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    I've only rarely heard it used as a shorthand for "I/we/you can't get laid". I've always interpreted it to mean the first thing. OP isn't wrong about the second though, honestly. It is a skill issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Sure, there are a minority of people who have legitimate physical disabilities that make it difficult for them to get laid, or impossible to have sex at all. I was under the impression that we were discussing the general case, though. I'm not going to prefix every comment I make with a statement about the exceptions when I'm speaking casually.

    It makes conversation awkward and difficult to follow, because you have to dig through the throat-clearing and ass-covering to figure out what the person is trying to say. If you want to discuss those exceptions, feel free to bring them up, but if you feel that I'm ableist for refusing to pad out all my comments with performative acknowledgements to satisfy your asinine sense of morality, then I don't know what to tell you. Well, actually, I guess I do: "No".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right, it's very early and I rarely (if ever) have a sexual appetite, so Imma need clarification: how is getting laid not a skill issue? It is my understanding that if people want it enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Just like how if people want to be billionaires enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen. People only have partial control over who they are and the circumstances they're in, and the changes they're able to make don't always make a difference here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (29 children)

    depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first

    but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean "im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago* (25 children)

    I don't know who gave you that idea, but it's incorrect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (22 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Most who have pursued a PhD, and all who attain it, are the lost ones.

    These poor souls live only a half life now. He was right to fear her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    We have walked through the valley of insanity, bashed our heads on the walls of frustration only to seek the next valley, the next wall for we thought we glimpsed enlightenment only a decade ago and have dreamed of it since. Sayeth not whether one draws close or hath traversed a false path. Half a life! Bah! A whole life and more is demanded and others too drawn in, burn thy candle from every end lest thou be cursed with an eternal postdoc and irrelevance.

    PhD=permanent head damage lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    "She has spent many years pursuing one small insignificant thing. Surely she will not give up on me any sooner!"

    e: the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. wouldn't even the manliest man want an advisor who is smarter than he? What Arthur does not have his Merlin? What Corleone does not have his consigliere?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 18 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I haven't got along well with any of the women with PHDs I've known but it wasn't a very large sample size for me to write them off as a whole. If I ran into too many more that had the same personality type as the ones I met I might consider it though because they were frustrating to be around. It wasn't that they were smarter than me, it was that they wouldn't even listen to me on subjects I was more knowledgeable about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Actively wanting to date someone less intelligent than oneself feels like predatorial behaviour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Wait until you find out about the order of magnitude of greater doubt there is when a man is attacked by a woman.

    Signed, a male who was molested by a female as a child, then told it's literally "impossible" for rape to happen in that direction when he futilely sought support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Dude, youre bringing some "exactly that kind of person" energy throughout this thread....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I'm bringing empathy for a demographic that's generally starved of it, and frustration toward those who have none for it, is all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can't believe people are downvoting you, I totally heard something similar about some guys who don't like dating women who make more money than they do... It's just kinda funny to see "PhD" sticking out like that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    She has higher education -> She earns more -> "She can't be earning more than me, I'm supposed to provide for the household!!!!!"

    I assume it's something along those lines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    She has kids

    I understand this perspective only if someone wants to remain childfree; it's impossible to compromise on having kids or not, you either do or you don't

    If it's just because he only wants his own biological kids, I'm less sympathetic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Depends on the specific circumstances, but i feel like it can be just as much of an issue, if you want children and don't even care if they are biologically related to you.

    Depending on how much the other parent of ones stepchildren is involved in their lives and their age, taking on a parenting role might not be wanted or even allowed. So you might have children living in your house, but won't ever have a complete parental relationship with them. You will always have that additional relationship that needs to be build around, whether that be vacations or where you live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel like this type of reply to the male loneliness epidemic (or y'know just the loneliness epidemic, since loneliness has been on the rise independent of gender) really does not give a shit about the people that experience loneliness by reducing them to the most horrible and loud of subset of them.

    Sure, there are incels that will twist and turn every societal tragedy into why they are victims and deserve to keep hating women. But by listening to them and reducing the entire problem to hahaha, the women haters are getting what they deserve, you are just hurting everyone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    I agree that we need to treat men (and indeed everyone, we're all victims) with compassion and care. However, I think these conversations often turn into tone policing our own community more than those who attack it

    In progressive spaces, we need to make room for anger and negative emotion because they are how we express the injustices of the world. The problem is, how do we allow people to express that anger safely, without causing harm. To that, I don't know the answer, but I have personally found art quite helpful

    Idk, I'm trying to also be sympathetic to that anger because it often comes from a place of hurt

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Their "advice" that they gave out is "be enjoyable" ... some real big brain stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid)

    Weird post, that literally just isn't a thing at all. This reads like a thinly veiled attempt to try to put down people they perceive as "not getting laid". This kind of "skill issue" attack rhetoric actually contributes to the male loneliness epidemic

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    It's as ironic as it is frustrating that so many of the same people who'd be outraged at the notion of a woman's value being determined in any part, by whether she is a virgin, will, gleefully and without irony, consider virginity not only a valid, but a go-to insult to use against men.

    Double standards are so irritating.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yeah, right? Sex isn‘t even a huge aspect of why I‘d want a relationship anymore. It would complement it, sure, but if the relationship otherwise is just an expensive, instagram story bullshit, body insecurity fuelled mess where eating disorder meets self-worth anxiety…fuck no!

    I just want someone to hug and cuddle with atp if I‘m being real. Does sharing this on lemmy make me “weak” and “un-manly” in the eyes of society? Maybe, but that‘s part of a problem I honestly don‘t care about any longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    To me, it reads like they're just extrapolating the statements from the loudest group of people who tend to yell online about the male loneliness epidemic (incels that blame women for their celibacy) out and assuming that's the majority opinion, which actually tends to be more referencing actual loneliness in general. Either that, or they just worded it a little badly.

    I do agree that the rhetoric can be a bit detrimental though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    This is gonna sound crazy but I've had some incredibly lonely sex where I haven't felt connected, intimate or seen by my partner.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7 but it's absolutely soulless and soul destroying in a lot of cases. Intimacy is what people what but can't figure out how to have. That's true in every form of relationship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I don't think that sounds crazy at all. I wish that this sentiment were discussed more freely in society, because I hate the stereotype that men only care about pure physicality in sex (and the corresponding stereotype that women only care about emotional connection).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    What? That's perfectly normal. First two times I had sex I was like, "THIS is what all the hoopla was about?!" Gf and I met at 17 and fucked like rabid wolverines. She had had the same experience! Two guys before me, meh.

    Felt that way with my ex-wife. Woke one day, realized I was lonely as hell, with a wife and two kids! Thank god she left. Took the kids, had to fight like hell to get 'em back, but thank god she's gone. Proceeded to have many fine lovers over the next few years, landed my wife, could not be happier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The problem is we live in a society pause for laugh track

    Where men are told they have to get laid or their personhood is questionable and women are told they must never get laid or their personhood is questionable.

    The result is that heterosexual men are frustrated, cisgender women everywhere are afraid of anything with a penis, and dating men as a transwomen is pretty fucking easy because men are tired and desperate.

    Source: Am Transwoman

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Do you have any idea how many femboys just went for me? I have to reject them all as it won't work out, but I appreciate it I guess.

    Meanwhile, a handful of women went for me. Like, I'm fine now with whatever happens. I simply accepted that people are different, and we don't all have to have the same lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 81 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    Dumbass take.

    A "skill issue" take, is just a republican "personal responsibility" take.

    It's dumb as fuck. How about you examine the systems that produce outcomes? Have you learned literally nothing from the last 50 years of the social justice movement?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -28 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    Don't deprive the weak men of their agency. So many Trump toxicity 'outcomes' chose this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback

    The notion of cause-and-effect has to be handled carefully when applied to feedback systems:

    Simple causal reasoning about a feedback system is difficult because the first system influences the second and second system influences the first, leading to a circular argument. This makes reasoning based upon cause and effect tricky, and it is necessary to analyze the system as a whole. As provided by Webster, feedback in business is the transmission of evaluative or corrective information about an action, event, or process to the original or controlling source.[2]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The solution to a complex system isn't to fret about how complex it is, it's to cut the feedback loop.

    Weak men who developed toxic politics are caught in a feedback loop. Cut them out of it. Not complicated, just abrasive.

    But you can continue constructing your nuanced and sympathetic understanding. These men just need to be understood, that will help them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    You're advocating genocide, or at least, one step away from it, and you don't even seem to realize it.

    You also seem to have no grasp of how complex systems or feedback work, given that feedback is a necessary and inherent part of many systems and cannot just be 'cut out'.

    Quite frankly, you're more toxic then most of the men you seem to despise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    it does not follow from the marginalization of the other that every time you experience the marginalization of the other, it is directly connected to genocide. humans are more than ideal atoms, and some of them need to be communicated with in the language of harsh blunt truth.

    Men who are unfuckable because of their politics need to man up. If you are spending several hundred words to say: "please integrate a more healthy relationship with masculinity" which is literally just telling them to man up with extra steps that they are uninterested in, you should consider that they are man enough to need to hear: "man up."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    You sound like someone who has read a lot and understood very little.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You sound like someone with the word 'master' in their online internet name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Oooh what an insult. I'm totally going to be embarassed by my public display name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most women tend to not want to form relationships with misogynistic incels. That's what's seen as a skill issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›