post
I mean it also does mean the first thing tho no?
I've only rarely heard it used as a shorthand for "I/we/you can't get laid". I've always interpreted it to mean the first thing. OP isn't wrong about the second though, honestly. It is a skill issue.
Sure, there are a minority of people who have legitimate physical disabilities that make it difficult for them to get laid, or impossible to have sex at all. I was under the impression that we were discussing the general case, though. I'm not going to prefix every comment I make with a statement about the exceptions when I'm speaking casually.
It makes conversation awkward and difficult to follow, because you have to dig through the throat-clearing and ass-covering to figure out what the person is trying to say. If you want to discuss those exceptions, feel free to bring them up, but if you feel that I'm ableist for refusing to pad out all my comments with performative acknowledgements to satisfy your asinine sense of morality, then I don't know what to tell you. Well, actually, I guess I do: "No".
Right, it's very early and I rarely (if ever) have a sexual appetite, so Imma need clarification: how is getting laid not a skill issue? It is my understanding that if people want it enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen.
Just like how if people want to be billionaires enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen. People only have partial control over who they are and the circumstances they're in, and the changes they're able to make don't always make a difference here.
depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first
but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean "im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"
Oh, so it's just the deliberate misunderstanding of a nuanced term, like what they did with toxic masculinity.
I don't know who gave you that idea, but it's incorrect
She has a PHD
wat.
Most who have pursued a PhD, and all who attain it, are the lost ones.
These poor souls live only a half life now. He was right to fear her.
We have walked through the valley of insanity, bashed our heads on the walls of frustration only to seek the next valley, the next wall for we thought we glimpsed enlightenment only a decade ago and have dreamed of it since. Sayeth not whether one draws close or hath traversed a false path. Half a life! Bah! A whole life and more is demanded and others too drawn in, burn thy candle from every end lest thou be cursed with an eternal postdoc and irrelevance.
PhD=permanent head damage lol.
"She has spent many years pursuing one small insignificant thing. Surely she will not give up on me any sooner!"
e: the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. wouldn't even the manliest man want an advisor who is smarter than he? What Arthur does not have his Merlin? What Corleone does not have his consigliere?
I haven't got along well with any of the women with PHDs I've known but it wasn't a very large sample size for me to write them off as a whole. If I ran into too many more that had the same personality type as the ones I met I might consider it though because they were frustrating to be around. It wasn't that they were smarter than me, it was that they wouldn't even listen to me on subjects I was more knowledgeable about.
Actively wanting to date someone less intelligent than oneself feels like predatorial behaviour.
Wait until you find out about the order of magnitude of greater doubt there is when a man is attacked by a woman.
Signed, a male who was molested by a female as a child, then told it's literally "impossible" for rape to happen in that direction when he futilely sought support.
Dude, youre bringing some "exactly that kind of person" energy throughout this thread....
I'm bringing empathy for a demographic that's generally starved of it, and frustration toward those who have none for it, is all.
I can't believe people are downvoting you, I totally heard something similar about some guys who don't like dating women who make more money than they do... It's just kinda funny to see "PhD" sticking out like that...
And then, on the other hand, are women who don't like dating men who don't make more money than they do: https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/women-are-struggling-to-find-men-who-make-as-much-money-as-they-do/
She has higher education -> She earns more -> "She can't be earning more than me, I'm supposed to provide for the household!!!!!"
I assume it's something along those lines?
She has kids
I understand this perspective only if someone wants to remain childfree; it's impossible to compromise on having kids or not, you either do or you don't
If it's just because he only wants his own biological kids, I'm less sympathetic
Depends on the specific circumstances, but i feel like it can be just as much of an issue, if you want children and don't even care if they are biologically related to you.
Depending on how much the other parent of ones stepchildren is involved in their lives and their age, taking on a parenting role might not be wanted or even allowed. So you might have children living in your house, but won't ever have a complete parental relationship with them. You will always have that additional relationship that needs to be build around, whether that be vacations or where you live.
Honestly, though, that sounds like an avoidant attachment style. He desperately wants intimacy, but it scares the bejeezus out of him, so he unconsciously finds a way to sandbag every potential connection.
Andrew Tate and Ben Shapiro say it's spot on.
And you listen to them to figure out what's correct and what isn't?
You got that backwards. Feminist and lefty leaning circles routinely dismiss the first as the second which is partly responsible for pushing young men further right.
I feel like this type of reply to the male loneliness epidemic (or y'know just the loneliness epidemic, since loneliness has been on the rise independent of gender) really does not give a shit about the people that experience loneliness by reducing them to the most horrible and loud of subset of them.
Sure, there are incels that will twist and turn every societal tragedy into why they are victims and deserve to keep hating women. But by listening to them and reducing the entire problem to hahaha, the women haters are getting what they deserve, you are just hurting everyone else.
I agree that we need to treat men (and indeed everyone, we're all victims) with compassion and care. However, I think these conversations often turn into tone policing our own community more than those who attack it
In progressive spaces, we need to make room for anger and negative emotion because they are how we express the injustices of the world. The problem is, how do we allow people to express that anger safely, without causing harm. To that, I don't know the answer, but I have personally found art quite helpful
Idk, I'm trying to also be sympathetic to that anger because it often comes from a place of hurt
Their "advice" that they gave out is "be enjoyable" ... some real big brain stuff

and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid)
Weird post, that literally just isn't a thing at all. This reads like a thinly veiled attempt to try to put down people they perceive as "not getting laid". This kind of "skill issue" attack rhetoric actually contributes to the male loneliness epidemic
It's as ironic as it is frustrating that so many of the same people who'd be outraged at the notion of a woman's value being determined in any part, by whether she is a virgin, will, gleefully and without irony, consider virginity not only a valid, but a go-to insult to use against men.
Double standards are so irritating.
Yeah, right? Sex isn‘t even a huge aspect of why I‘d want a relationship anymore. It would complement it, sure, but if the relationship otherwise is just an expensive, instagram story bullshit, body insecurity fuelled mess where eating disorder meets self-worth anxiety…fuck no!
I just want someone to hug and cuddle with atp if I‘m being real. Does sharing this on lemmy make me “weak” and “un-manly” in the eyes of society? Maybe, but that‘s part of a problem I honestly don‘t care about any longer.
To me, it reads like they're just extrapolating the statements from the loudest group of people who tend to yell online about the male loneliness epidemic (incels that blame women for their celibacy) out and assuming that's the majority opinion, which actually tends to be more referencing actual loneliness in general. Either that, or they just worded it a little badly.
I do agree that the rhetoric can be a bit detrimental though.
This is gonna sound crazy but I've had some incredibly lonely sex where I haven't felt connected, intimate or seen by my partner.
omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7 but it's absolutely soulless and soul destroying in a lot of cases. Intimacy is what people what but can't figure out how to have. That's true in every form of relationship.
you can have sex instantly 24/7
Fuck me. Conservatives told me gay was a choice. And here I picked the wrong team.
omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7
Either you're male, things have changed a LOT since I found a steady partner, or I'm really bad at this.
I don't think that sounds crazy at all. I wish that this sentiment were discussed more freely in society, because I hate the stereotype that men only care about pure physicality in sex (and the corresponding stereotype that women only care about emotional connection).
Same, it was like a one night stand but with someone I had known and slept with before. I call it the n+1 night stand.
What? That's perfectly normal. First two times I had sex I was like, "THIS is what all the hoopla was about?!" Gf and I met at 17 and fucked like rabid wolverines. She had had the same experience! Two guys before me, meh.
Felt that way with my ex-wife. Woke one day, realized I was lonely as hell, with a wife and two kids! Thank god she left. Took the kids, had to fight like hell to get 'em back, but thank god she's gone. Proceeded to have many fine lovers over the next few years, landed my wife, could not be happier.
The problem is we live in a society pause for laugh track
Where men are told they have to get laid or their personhood is questionable and women are told they must never get laid or their personhood is questionable.
The result is that heterosexual men are frustrated, cisgender women everywhere are afraid of anything with a penis, and dating men as a transwomen is pretty fucking easy because men are tired and desperate.
Source: Am Transwoman
Trans people always have the greatest insight into these issues. Thank you!
Do you have any idea how many femboys just went for me? I have to reject them all as it won't work out, but I appreciate it I guess.
Meanwhile, a handful of women went for me. Like, I'm fine now with whatever happens. I simply accepted that people are different, and we don't all have to have the same lives.
Dumbass take.
A "skill issue" take, is just a republican "personal responsibility" take.
It's dumb as fuck. How about you examine the systems that produce outcomes? Have you learned literally nothing from the last 50 years of the social justice movement?
Don't deprive the weak men of their agency. So many Trump toxicity 'outcomes' chose this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback
The notion of cause-and-effect has to be handled carefully when applied to feedback systems:
Simple causal reasoning about a feedback system is difficult because the first system influences the second and second system influences the first, leading to a circular argument. This makes reasoning based upon cause and effect tricky, and it is necessary to analyze the system as a whole. As provided by Webster, feedback in business is the transmission of evaluative or corrective information about an action, event, or process to the original or controlling source.[2]
The solution to a complex system isn't to fret about how complex it is, it's to cut the feedback loop.
Weak men who developed toxic politics are caught in a feedback loop. Cut them out of it. Not complicated, just abrasive.
But you can continue constructing your nuanced and sympathetic understanding. These men just need to be understood, that will help them.
You're advocating genocide, or at least, one step away from it, and you don't even seem to realize it.
You also seem to have no grasp of how complex systems or feedback work, given that feedback is a necessary and inherent part of many systems and cannot just be 'cut out'.
Quite frankly, you're more toxic then most of the men you seem to despise.
it does not follow from the marginalization of the other that every time you experience the marginalization of the other, it is directly connected to genocide. humans are more than ideal atoms, and some of them need to be communicated with in the language of harsh blunt truth.
Men who are unfuckable because of their politics need to man up. If you are spending several hundred words to say: "please integrate a more healthy relationship with masculinity" which is literally just telling them to man up with extra steps that they are uninterested in, you should consider that they are man enough to need to hear: "man up."
You sound like someone who has read a lot and understood very little.
You sound like someone with the word 'master' in their online internet name.
Oooh what an insult. I'm totally going to be embarassed by my public display name.
Most women tend to not want to form relationships with misogynistic incels. That's what's seen as a skill issue.
top 95 comments