My Favorite Ozzy Quote...

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

He died to forgive us our virtues.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Did Ozzy Osbourne really eat a bat onstage? Rock's most outrageous rumor, explained

    The answer is: yes, kinda, a little bit, but there's some contours to the tale.

  • source
  • 54 comments in c/memes@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And was married to cunt

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago
    [–] 65 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    If I recall correctly, the head biting was an accident.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And it wasn't a bat. It was a bird. Dove or pigeon, IIRC. He thought it was a prop, not a real bird

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago*

    That was a different incident, when he was negotiating with his label, iirc. I think he brought two doves to release as a symbol of peace and when negotiations went south, he intentionally bit their heads off.

    The bat incident is very well-documented, and is definitely a different story.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How do you accidentally bite the head off a bat? That's like accidentally sticking your penis in someone other than your SO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    He's like the only major rock star from the 60s-80s period I can think of who I haven't heard about sexually harassing or assaulting someone at some point

    e; I stand corrected

    The couple used to physically fight regularly and, according to Osbourne, they would "beat the shit out of each other." She has described herself as "a beaten woman" when she was at the hands of husband Ozzy where he once knocked out her front teeth. She once retaliated by throwing a full bottle of scotch at his head.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharon_Osbourne

    The couple used to physically fight regularly and, according to Osbourne, they would "beat the shit out of each other." She has described herself as "a beaten woman" when she was at the hands of husband Ozzy where he once knocked out her front teeth. She once retaliated by throwing a full bottle of scotch at his head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How much has society fucked me when my first thought was "well at least it was mutual abuse and he didn't rape a minor".

    No. None of it is okay, what the fuck brain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It may not be ok, but certainly better than rape. They may have passed on another form of trauma to their kids like every generation before and it may have taken quite a long time but they did finally make things and each other better. Which I think is a good relationship in my book.

    From my understanding anyway. Not gonna proclaim to be some Ozzy Osbourne biographer or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Why is no one mentioning that he once peed on the Alamo?... Does no one remember the Alamo?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    He didn’t piss on the actual Alamo but it was close enough Texas didn’t care

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ok, you're officially right, as in he did not pee on the actual Alamo... he peed on the Alamo Cenotaph Monument, which is the monument to honor those who fell in the battle. I'm not sure that's any better, and I can understand why the Texans were upset by it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    No one person has ever invented a genre of music. Dont get me wrong, I won't argue against calling him the grandad of metal or whatever it is, but he INVENTED heavey metal? Fucking insane take.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    King Crimson's '21st century schizoid man' came out in '69, after the formation of black Sabbath but before their first album was released, and I think it has a decent claim to being a 'metal' song. There was definitely a vibe for that kind of musical experimentation around that time, although Black Sabbath can claim to be more defining of what 'metal' was.

    Anyway yeah, agreed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    After making that comment, I went and compared first album dates with other bands I thought came out at a similar time, and sabbath was 5 or 10 yrs ahead of them. And Ive no idea when Earth got started. But yea King Crimson and some hippy rock who were getting a little heavier where the only big names I saw listed as metal in 1970.

    I stand by he didnt invent it singlehandly, but dam if anyone else could contend for title of Grandfather of metal. I made it to a few ozzfeasts in the late 90s early 00s, great time. He fucking rocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can waste all sorts of time on the net arguing with people about who started what genres. Then you start getting into terms like proto-metal, etc.

    No personal issue with your choice because it's a fucking awesome song, but if wanted to be one of those assholes I'd say it's heavy prog rock, in the pool of music metal would later draw from. That said, I'm no musicologist, and somewhere right now there's someone in a black t-shirt with a very cool but difficult to read band name on it reading this, aghast.

    I think we can all agree that Black Sabbath is a cornerstone in what metal generally (and specifically sludge, stoner metal, etc.) developed into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If that song doesn't count, then I think you really do have to hand it to Black Sabbath as the defining progenitor of the genre. Even if it does, it was an impressive exploratory foray; Black Sabbath set up camp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Stupid thought but BS's first two albums both came out within like 14 months of that song. Perhaps it was the kernel that got their sound together. I wonder if there are any recordings of Sabbath from before the release of that song...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Ohh did he somehow dethrone Lucas being the Prince of Darkness?

    Joke aside, RIP

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    he use to

    \sigh

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    i actually needed this explanation, i'm young

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    Ozzy Osbourne aka: the prince of darkness and his band Black Sabbath and later solo Ozzy, are some of the originators of what we now know as heavy metal. Ozzy was well known for onstage theatrics which were popular at the time for bands like Sabbath and Alice Cooper. Big stage shows showing fake gore and violence like the precursors to Gwar. They would act out killing people and animals on stage as part of their showmanship routine and throw offal and guts into the crowd. "Worship Satan". Have women in lingerie on stage for no reason but to get covered in "blood" or act like they were being murdered. Eventually the crowds started throwing stuff back. One such stage show involved a fan throwing a "live" bat on stage. Ozzy picked it up and bit it's head off "not knowing" it was alive. There are conflicting stories about this of course.

    Much of this also led to the satanic panic we experienced as kids in the 80's and 90's.

    Likely a lot of these actions were because Ozzy was a raging alcoholic and drug user for much of his professional life. There are lots of interviews with him completely fucked out of his brain. He would intentionally drop acid and booze before said interviews and sometimes even his band mates couldn't handle him. Like Kieth Richards people even joked that Ozzy would outlive everyone because he had done so much stupid shit publicly over the course of his life and survived.

    Ozzy was one of the artists that morphed the huge epic stage shows of the 60's rock and roll era into the chaos and drama of early heavy metal. Aside from his shortcomings Ozzy was an original rock and roll master.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It was not "his band". Although Ozzy was in Black Sabbath from the beginning, he was enlisted by Bill Ward and Tony Iommi together with Geezer Butler because as a drummer and a guitarist with a vision they needed bass and vocals with them.

    Ozzy was kicked out in 1979 and started his solo career in the shock rock tradition he is mostly known for. The idea that sparked Black Sabbath however was a heavier blues than ever heard before and that was Ward and Iommi.

    As you say, they were some of the originators of heavy metal. There is no single inventor of the genre. There never is. Culture is cross pollination and collaboration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Ozzy made it "his band". That's what front men did then. The sound came.from the band. The recognition came from the front man. In this case Ozzy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Who's band when they change their sound so much they basically fall into obscurity after Ozzy leaves?

    Dio was a shit front man and his presence lost fans immediately. That they hung in for three more albums was valiant but pointless. Dragging out the death of the band over the next several decades because their sound was so good without Ozzy.

    And had Charlie "fired" Mick, the same fate would have befallen the rolling stones as did Sabbath. You could have all sound you want yet without the charisma you had nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Are you by any chance a singer in a band that still hasn't caught a break because of external reasons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why must it always turn into personal attacks when people realize that their point is actually pointless?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    It was a joke based on the stereotype of singers and their ego. There are plenty of other stereotypes about instrumentalists, such as bass players being simple, lead guitarrist that find everything else support for solos, drummers being brutes, keyboardists being music theorists and so on. I thought you'd recognize it but alas.

    But sure. You're using hypotheticals for arguments that you think is proof when presented with historical evidence that the frontman was one job of the band and not the entire act. There isn't really much to discuss against something like that. I could invent my own alternative history too. But why.

    And it's not very nice to call the rest of the musicians in the band irrelevant and replaceable.

    Edit: clarifications

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Never once suggested the front man was the entire act. I used a word that you took offence to, "His", which was simply used to refer to the band that Ozzy was a part of not that he "owned" the band. Then I stated my position and defended it. One that is quite valid and accurate for the band and time period. That's generally how discussion works. I didn't make up any alternative history. Without Ozzy Sabbath would not have been what they were. Proven by their lack of success following his departure.

    To each their own I suppose, but why.

    Edit: damn you certainly have a way of putting words in others mouths. Try stay on track.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I don't even understand what you are arguing any more because it seems to me that you are full of contradiction. On one hand it is the band of the front man band because "that is how it was", but on the other hand you never said so. I say that there is more to a band than the front man, including the initial comment that Ozzy was recruited because others had the musical vision for it. You maintain the position that it is all the front man, giving example how you dislike what Black Sabbath became post Ozzy, disregarding that Ozzy would not be what he was without the band that brought him up to fame. When I presented a well known and here fact checked case of a front man vs "the band" controversy from close enough the same generation of rock music, you made up an alternative history about Rolling Stones and avoiding the topical discussion about the front man status.

    Hence the joke about the singer which I was fit because this would be the position that a singer would hold, though I agree it was unnecessary with the secondary comment of mine that came from frustration from the stated above.

    I don't think it is a far leap though that the sum of this implies that the rest of the band members are irrelevant and replaceable, and my only argument is really that they are not and that it is a mistake to argue that they were because of how you subjectively may perceive or have perceived rock acts as audience back in the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Great summary, but just as a point of order apparently the bat might not have actually been alive when he bit it: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72ppzwek90o

    That being said, he apparently did on a separate occasion bite the heads off of two live doves. Dude was on hella drugs and alcohol, but goddamn was he talented.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments