Archived link

in an open letter to Canada’s Minister of Public Safety and the Foreign Influence Commissioner, NDP MP Jenny Kwan is demanding officials verify findings of a new report on the global proliferation of illegal Chinese police stations.

“These allegations warrant immediate attention,” Kwan wrote in response to the Nov. 6 report called A Formula for Repression – China’s Global Grid for Community Control.

“The Canadian government has an obligation to verify the report’s findings, determine whether these operations are active in Canada and establish whether individuals or organizations are facilitating activities on behalf of the Chinese government that constitute foreign interference, intimidation or coercion.”

...

The report’s author, Laura Harth of Safeguard Defenders, found more than 10 police forces from five Chinese provinces are involved in a global network of Chinese Communist Party operatives whose “core aim” is to control the diaspora.

In two 2022 reports, Safeguard Defenders detailed the activity of more than 100 overseas Chinese police stations in more than 50 countries. The RCMP investigated groups in Richmond, Toronto and Montreal, but did not recommend charges.

Kwan’s letter to Minister Gary Anandasangaree and Commissioner Anton Boegman asks whether Chinese overseas police stations or affiliated networks remain active or have expanded operations since 2022 in Canada. She seeks protection for any member of Canada’s Chinese, Hong Kong, Uyghur, Tibetan and Taiwan communities at risk of intimidation, surveillance and coercion.

“Canadians must be free to speak, organize, protest and participate in public life without fear of intimidation or reprisal from foreign states,” Kwan wrote.

“The Prime Minister and the Minister of Public Safety have an obligation to ensure that these allegations are investigated and addressed without delay.”

...

Harth’s new report explains how the Chinese Communist Party divides every city, town and village into grids of a few hundred households. Each grid has a manager who reports upward. Nine of the 10 tasks for managers involve surveillance and control.

“There is a file on every resident,” said Harth’s report. “Anything seen as a threat to Party rule is escalated to a hub where enforcement stands ready to act. Internationally, this system of mass surveillance, control and suppression is projected through a global grid of United Front-affiliated organizations or designated liaisons. They are run by the Party’s ‘bridge and bond’ to the diaspora: the Overseas Chinese Federation.”

Safeguard Defenders found nearly 1,250 liaisons in at least 91 countries carrying out domestic grid functions abroad.

...

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 1 day ago

China has to be by a long way the most insecure "powerful" country in the world. We have these police stations on foreign soil to put manners on dissidents speaking out, their leader banning any comparisons on China's closed internet of him and Winnie the Pooh, their censored closed internet, the hilarious "wolf warrior" phase, mentions of Tianemen, Uyghur and Tibetan oppression, the "one China" policy and so on. Bunch of super sensitive snowflakes.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    No need for "illegal police stations" when the diaspora willingly install WeChat and gives out every permission. 🤦

    What a lovely living room scene of parents watching propaganda wechat shorts ON REPEAT about how powerful the PLA is and how they're gonna take Taiwan and on SPEAKERS about how "ukraine and nato are the dEvILs", and also "democrats are ruining everything, LoOk aT aLL tHeSe iLLeGaLs aNd hOmElEsS" (seriously thats what my house looks like)

    Seriously, we need a petition for WeCrap to get deplatformed. And btw deplatforming wouldnt violate free speech since its a corporate decision, not government.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Good luck with that. Liberals have been ignoring these for a decade.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago

    The Canadian government has an obligation to verify the report’s findings, determine whether these operations are active in Canada and establish whether individuals or organizations are facilitating activities on behalf of the Chinese government that constitute foreign interference, intimidation or coercion.

    The RCMP tried based on the mentioned report from 2022. They didn't find anything and are now getting sued for defamation worth millions.

    How it started in 2022 (from that same report): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/rcmp-investigating-chinese-police-stations-canada-1.6627166

    This comes after the Spain-based human rights group Safeguard Defenders reported that more than 50 exist worldwide, including three in the Greater Toronto Area in predominantly Chinese communities.

    Where it's at now: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-rcmp-investigations-chinese-police-1.7645361

    The RCMP has closed its investigation into alleged clandestine Chinese police stations in the Montreal area, and it is not recommending charges.

    The closure comes as the RCMP faces a $4.9-million defamation lawsuit from the groups named in the probe.

    So just further fear mongering from one trick racist Scotty because they can't be bothered to do their homework.

  • source
  • 30 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    China China bo bina banana fana fo fina....why do you post about nothing but China

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    As some commenters are trying to play this down, here is the original report:

    A Formula for Repression - China’s Global Grid for Community Control - (pdf)

    In this report, Safeguard Defenders finds nearly 1,250 formally designated liaisons in at least 91 countries which exist to carry out domestic grid functions abroad. This number is based on our conservative methodology, and a likely underrepresentation of actual activity. The Party numbers its affiliated associations abroad in the tens of thousands, every one of them a potential grid liaison in the waiting.

    Included in this number are the very liaison stations we exposed years ago and were told "merely" provided services to the diaspora community ...

    It makes a good read and is well-sourced citing over 1,000 sources.

    @AGM@lemmy.ca

    @Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    The first line in that report

    In 2022, Safeguard Defenders published 110 Overseas and Patrol & Persuade: two reports detailingthe activity of over 100 overseas Chinese police stations operating in more than 50 countries

    So it's still based off the 2022 report that the RCMP already investigated the claims of.

    Real sad Scotty

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    The Canadian government has an obligation to verify the report’s findings, determine whether these operations are active in Canada and establish whether individuals or organizations are facilitating activities on behalf of the Chinese government that constitute foreign interference, intimidation or coercion.

    The RCMP tried based on the mentioned report from 2022. They didn't find anything and are now getting sued for defamation worth millions.

    How it started in 2022 (from that same report): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/rcmp-investigating-chinese-police-stations-canada-1.6627166

    This comes after the Spain-based human rights group Safeguard Defenders reported that more than 50 exist worldwide, including three in the Greater Toronto Area in predominantly Chinese communities.

    Where it's at now: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-rcmp-investigations-chinese-police-1.7645361

    The RCMP has closed its investigation into alleged clandestine Chinese police stations in the Montreal area, and it is not recommending charges.

    The closure comes as the RCMP faces a $4.9-million defamation lawsuit from the groups named in the probe.

    So just further fear mongering from one trick racist Scotty because they can't be bothered to do their homework.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    Huge tip. Its not 2022 anymore.

    Edit: my point is using an old investigation is not really enough to discredit new information and credible concern (which exists outside of Canada too). What i find most interesting are people who go out of their way to disparage any investigations into the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    I think you should read the OP article, because it uses the 2022 report data. The same NGO is using their old report.

    So perhaps your comment should be directed at the NGO or the outlets regurgitating the addendum to the report (that turned out false).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 22 hours ago

    @Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca

    I think you should read the OP article, because it uses the 2022 report data. The same NGO is using their old report.

    Your claim is wrong.

    I think you should read the article before commenting. Or, even better, read the new report by Safeguard Defenders published in October 2026, two weeks ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -1 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

    The article you are linking to relates to a single organization.

    And, no, the report Jenny Kwan refers to is not published in 2022 but in 2026, two weeks ago.

    What you are doing here is blatant disinformation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 19 hours ago* (3 children)

    Scotty, read what you post. From your own post:

    In two 2022 reports, Safeguard Defenders detailed the activity of more than 100 overseas Chinese police stations in more than 50 countries. The RCMP investigated groups in Richmond, Toronto and Montreal, but did not recommend charges.

    How blinded by racism does a person have to be to not even read their own article they're sharing?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    @Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca

    This was the report 2022. But

    Harth’s new report explains how the Chinese Communist Party divides every city, town and village into grids of a few hundred households.

    Harth's new report, which is the reason for Kwan's letter, has been published end of October 2026.

    The original report makes a good read. But read everything, not just the parts that you like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago* (1 child)

    Yes, harth has added more narrative. But the original report (that was already investigated by RCMP) is still wrong. So what's the point of narrative if content is false?

    Do better, Scotty. I think you need to critically read what you're sharing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 39 minutes ago

    harth has added more narrative.

    No, this is a new report. It describes China's system of repression, ranging from the police stations in China's municipalities and how they are connected to which 'liaison offices' in Canada and other Western countries, including the 'liaison officers' and other information based on 1,200 sources.

    But the original report (that was already investigated by RCMP) is still wrong.

    No, you are wrong here. The RCMP has investigated a single organization mentioned in the 2022 report.

    What you are doing here is spreading disinformation, @Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 1 day ago (16 children)

    Kwan wastes so much time with this shit...

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (15 children)

    Get out of here. This is serious foreign interference how the hell can you disparage this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Nah, I generally support Kwan but this report is some NED funded propaganda, as was a lot of what China Action did before it became Safeguard Defenders. The Canadian government should have internal processes for protecting against foreign interference, but you can't go wasting resources chasing every scare report the NED funds. Go read the actual report and you'll see it wastes no time getting into very heavy handed bias and manipulative framing. The RCMP and CSIS can do their own work on whatever is really going on in Canada at a hopefully much higher standard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 22 hours ago* (4 children)

    @AGM@lemmy.ca

    Read the report by Safeguard Defenders. From your comment, one can easily infer that you haven't done so.

    I generally support Kwan

    You are generally supporting the Chinese government, at least this is what your comment history tells.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    It's evident you didn't even read my comment, in which I indicate I read it and that's what I base my comment on, and where I suggest Canada protect itself from foreign interference with higher standards.

    Do go ahead and lean into posting history though. Many of us know yours, and the history of your other sockpuppet accounts always pushing the same narratives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    @AGM@lemmy.ca

    The report by Safeguard Defenders contains hundreds of sources and is a well-sourced investigation. Everyone who has read it knows this. Your comments perfectly fit into Chinese propaganda slop. It is the same wording, the same pseudo-intellectual tonality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child)

    Lol, your attempts are so weak, Scotty. I'm even encouraging people to go read it themselves so they can see the way it's written. I'm encouraging people to read and judge for themselves, including reading both my posting history and yours.

    The real irony here is you pushing a US-funded report as something to guide Canada's internal policies while claiming to oppose foreign interference. The RCMP and CSIS don't need a foreign-funded advocacy group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Why should I worry about this shit when the IDF has government funded recruitment terror schools on our soil?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    You’re only capable of caring about one thing at a time? Life must be tough for you. Sorry to hear it, little buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago (2 children)

    I'm not interested in getting side tracked with bullshit when there is real work to be done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Because this hurts real people at the moment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    IDF are bombing children in tents "at the moment."

    China is supposedly leaning on ex-citizens, and that's if you actually believe this report.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 17 hours ago* (1 child)

    It's not that I believe this report or not, but I have almost first hand experience. That's why I'm definitely empathetic to others who suffer, including those in Gaza, whether they are children or adults.

    It's hypocritical if you only care about those in Gaza but not those who are "ex-Chinese citizens".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 10 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Oooh! Do the US & Russia next! 🍿

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Unlisted Chinese ones a bit more than most.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    From our collective place in the food chain, the differences are slight. ☝🏼

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I mean, the usual cops don't threaten all your friends and family in addition to yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Are you trying to defend the Chinese Secret Police or ICE, because their motives might be different but they both threaten your friends and family.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment