
post
Synthetic Learning Originated Pictures.
Why bother when slop already exists in the zeitgeist?
What do you mean? Mocking and ridiculing the powerful is often our only tool on the left to effectively use. Look at what we've done to these llm models already, people are rejecting the hype, their bonds aren't selling, and the house of cards could collapse.
I don't know who this zeitgeist fellow is, but I know that turning public opinion against the corporos is not just a right, but a duty, of every patriotic citizen, and or any citizen loyal to their tribe, to their families, to wildlife and the environment, and so forth.
we’ve already got a term for it - slop
I just use "AI image", everyone can probably understand it and avoids both calling them art and calling non-AI images rendered by a computer crap
I've seen this post (or a similar one) about 8 times by now and I forget about "CRAP" the moment I close the tab.
i have something in my clipboard which i think came from lemmy with the same acronym: computer rendered anonymized plagiarism
Accurate because art requires emotion. No emotion = not art.
IMO art is just something "useless but pretty" that humans produce. I don't think emotion is really a requirement. e.g. Mondrian painted lines and colored rectangles and it's considered art but I don't see much emotion in those works. In fact I'd say these represent the exact opposite of emotion: logic, order and rigidity.
Defining arts is pointless as artists just love to break out of such definitions.
Well I don't ! I do this for a living. Rendering artificial pictures on a computer. Sooo....

all 28 comments