all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 34 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    Synthetic Learning Originated Pictures.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    Why bother when slop already exists in the zeitgeist?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 17 hours ago

    What do you mean? Mocking and ridiculing the powerful is often our only tool on the left to effectively use. Look at what we've done to these llm models already, people are rejecting the hype, their bonds aren't selling, and the house of cards could collapse.

    I don't know who this zeitgeist fellow is, but I know that turning public opinion against the corporos is not just a right, but a duty, of every patriotic citizen, and or any citizen loyal to their tribe, to their families, to wildlife and the environment, and so forth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 18 hours ago

    No. My blender art is C.R.A.P....

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    we’ve already got a term for it - slop

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago

    It's all slop to me.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago

    I just use "AI image", everyone can probably understand it and avoids both calling them art and calling non-AI images rendered by a computer crap

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago

    Simulated Hueristic Intelligence Thing (SHIT)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 15 hours ago

    That is just wrong, digital art exists, obviously it doesn't use ai.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 17 hours ago

    I've seen this post (or a similar one) about 8 times by now and I forget about "CRAP" the moment I close the tab.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    i have something in my clipboard which i think came from lemmy with the same acronym: computer rendered anonymized plagiarism

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago

    Computer-Rendered Automatic Product

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago

    Ha ha, nice! I will refer to it as that, let's make this catch on.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago

    I already Calle it AI gen. But CRAP is much better.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    Accurate because art requires emotion. No emotion = not art.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 22 minutes ago

    IMO art is just something "useless but pretty" that humans produce. I don't think emotion is really a requirement. e.g. Mondrian painted lines and colored rectangles and it's considered art but I don't see much emotion in those works. In fact I'd say these represent the exact opposite of emotion: logic, order and rigidity.

    Defining arts is pointless as artists just love to break out of such definitions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 17 hours ago
    [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    I too like this

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago

    Well I don't ! I do this for a living. Rendering artificial pictures on a computer. Sooo....

  • source