you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

Accurate because art requires emotion. No emotion = not art.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    IMO art is just something "useless but pretty" that humans produce. I don't think emotion is really a requirement. e.g. Mondrian painted lines and colored rectangles and it's considered art but I don't see much emotion in those works. In fact I'd say these represent the exact opposite of emotion: logic, order and rigidity.

    Defining arts is pointless as artists just love to break out of such definitions.

  • source
  • parent