Protesters are planning to gather outside the Brooklyn home of US Sen. Chuck Schumer on Friday morning, demanding he block what they've dubbed a "dirty data center deal" from passing through the Senate.

The bill, known as the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA), is aimed at speeding the permitting process for energy infrastructure, including renewable energy projects, transmission lines, oil and gas pipelines, and other major industrial developments.

The Senate is preparing for a procedural vote on Monday to advance the bill, which will require Democratic support. Schumer (D-NY)—who is hoping to be reelected as Senate majority leader by his party next month—has not publicly taken a position on the legislation, according to Heatmap.

The bill has faced opposition from environmental justice and Indigenous rights groups who warn it will gut long-standing environmental protections, undermine tribal sovereignty, and fast-track fossil fuel and other polluting projects, while restricting the public's ability to challenge harmful developments in court.

They warn that the legislation would also accelerate the expansion of energy-hungry artificial intelligence data centers and the gas-fired power plants and pipelines needed to power them, while making it harder for state and local communities to block or challenge their development.

Specifically, the bill would expand the authority of the Republican-controlled Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is chaired by an appointee of President Donald Trump, to approve permits for interstate transmission lines.

Jeremy Symons of the Environmental Protection Network has warned that under the BAAJA, the commission could hypothetically issue permits to Elon Musk to build a coal-powered data center in the Grand Canyon and “no one can do anything” about it.

The bill was introduced in September in the Senate by Sens. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Whitehouse, the bill's lead Democratic sponsor and the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, holds the most investments of any US senator in data center-related holdings—between $2.1 million and $8.6 million, according to Forbes. According to Sludge, he and his wife hold up to $12.3 million in AI-related stocks, including major tech companies and data center operators.

In a letter sent Thursday, Food & Water Watch and more than 160 other environmental, health, consumer, and religious groups urged Congress to reject the BAAJA.

"Data centers can have impacts beyond the lands they occupy, driving significant energy demand and need for grid infrastructure, which can increase cost for the public, as well as create new sources of air and water pollution, which can adversely impact public health and the climate crisis," they wrote. "This push to expand data centers comes as lawmakers in Washington, DC, are considering a backroom deal that will drive forward a massive buildout of AI data centers and the fossil fuel infrastructure to power them."

Sen. Schumer Hosts Roundtable On Rising Energy CostsUS Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) speak to reporters after a roundtable on rising energy costs on Capitol Hill on March 17, 2026, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Activists with Food & Water Watch, New York Communities for Change, 350Brooklyn, Climate Families NYC, and Indivisible Brooklyn plan to gather outside Schumer's Park Slope apartment on Friday with a large, smoking AI data center prop and a giant "blank check."

With signs that read “No blank checks for Big Tech” and “stop the dirty data center deal,” they plan to continue the protest afterward at the Fort Greene office of Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who is currently the front-runner to become the next speaker of the House.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), who has proposed banning data centers on federal lands and vocally opposed the BAAJA, noted that the bill would be brought to the floor just days after voters across the country sent "a clear message that Americans want their representatives to protect their health and environment, not sell them out to Big Tech and Big Oil."

On Tuesday, communities across 10 US states passed 43 out of 44 initiatives that proposed banning or pausing construction on data centers or infrastructure of a certain size. Meanwhile, candidates who made opposition to data centers central to their campaigns, including Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, Sherrod Brown in Ohio, and Troy Jackson in Maine, won convincingly over their Republican opponents.

“People across the country are rightfully chasing data centers out of their communities, and the industry is eyeing public lands as a way around this growing opposition," said Jim Walsh, policy director at Food & Water Watch.

He said that the lawmakers pushing for the BAAJA were doing so "in blatant disregard for the overwhelming public backlash to Big Tech that helped drive voters to the polls."

Kenilworth, New Jersey Considers Construction Of CoreWeave AI Data CenterPeople participate in a protest against the CoreWeave AI data center outside the municipal building in Kenilworth, New Jersey, on October 21, 2026. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

After Tuesday's blue wave handed Democrats at least 54 Senate seats, Schumer predicted, "I’ll be reelected as majority leader.”

But many incoming Democratic senators, including El-Sayed, Jackson, and Sen.-elect Peggy Flanagan (Minn.), were vocally critical of Schumer on the campaign trail. Meanwhile, pooled state and district polls found that 59% of Democratic voters wanted someone else to lead the Senate while just 22% backed Schumer.

A former aide to a lawmaker on the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources told Common Dreams that the BAAJA is "a test for Schumer’s leadership campaign."

“Will the first thing Schumer does after the overwhelming rebuke of Trump that voters delivered be giving Trump nearly unlimited power to build data centers where he wants?” the former aide asked. "Or will he see the opportunity to send a message that he's up to lead the mandate voters gave Democrats?”


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
19 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 105 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Big media keeps referring to him and Jefferies as the next congressional leadership, but that shits an election and any member of Congress can run.

There is no fucking reason either of them need to be allowed near any leadership position again.

Everyone needs to spend the next 3 months pestering the shit of their representatives reminding them of that.

Especially if it's a neoliberal who's up in 2028 for a primary

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    I need to start the web site chuckschumerfuckoff.com

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago* (2 children)

    No dude, not 3 months. It’s weeks away.

    Sign the petition, call AND email your senators right fucking now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago

    The election for leadership is January...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Speaker_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives_election

    An election for speaker of the United States House of Representatives took place on January 3, 2025, on the opening day of the 119th United States Congress, two months after the 2024 elections for the United States House of Representatives.

    I thought it was the end of January, not the begining.

    And that fucking petition does the sam as every change.org petition: nothing.

    Don't waste time with it, spend it advocating for people to contact elected reps instead, that actually does something

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago

    Big media keeps referring to him and Jefferies as the next congressional leadership, but that shits an election and any member of Congress can run.

    Well yeah, corporate media want Schumer and Jeffries because they can be depended on to maintain the status quo. They have an interest in presenting it as a foregone conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 5 days ago

    This wet noodle did next to nothing to stand up to trump. He has to go.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Isnt this guy employed by Israel?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 5 days ago

    Why do Americans and American leaders keep pinning their hopes and leadership into these ancient dinosaurs.

    America used to be a source of intellectual youthfulness and vigor .... but over the past few decades the political landscape just looks like a care home for millionaires who are completely disconnected from reality.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago

    I wrote personal letters to my senators and house rep to not elect Schumer or Jeffries because if they do I’ll have to vote Republican next election because I don’t want to get thrown into the camps.

    We need law and order restored ASAP and we need the right leaders to do it.

  • source
  • A lot of dumb asses voted for the orange asshole because they wanted nothing to do with the status quo. These are low information voters, just knowing in their bones that something has to change. They didn't see the corruption, civil rights violations, human rights violations, disregard of the Constitution, and so on, as a deal breaker. Just the price of gas. You can call them dummies who can't see past their wallet, and I have, but the core problem, that the status quo isn't cutting it, isn't wrong.

    Dems have a chance here to show they are a positive, dynamic force for change. Big Issue change. Like healthcare, just to point out one of the big ones. The optics of Schumer and Jefferies leading again will be like driving that bus of optimism straight off a fucking cliff.

    Being small minded dummies hasn't stopped the Dems before from pushing unpopular candidates or policies, so I don't have a lot of hope. I'm just trying to hold onto the warm comforting glow of Wednesday morning's election results for as long as I can.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    When people are consistently ineffective and appear captured by the enemy they are usually replaced. Watching from afar, ineffective and captured appears to be the right words.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago

    If it was an oil company, he would not say the same thing

  • source