It's more important to get the losers like Schumer, Pelosi, and Jeffries out first.
You build a house from the foundation and the democrats have been blackballing progressives for their own monetary gain for... well forever.
It's more important to get the losers like Schumer, Pelosi, and Jeffries out first.
You build a house from the foundation and the democrats have been blackballing progressives for their own monetary gain for... well forever.
Unfortunately, I think we'll get a Progressive male president before we get a female anything president.
I still hear people talk about how they wouldn't want a woman president, and some of these people are democratic women.
fucking ...alabama... just voted for a trans canidate, the idea clinton or harris lost because they were woman is nonsense. they lost because they were very obviously establishment stooges. one a career parasite most well-known for not having enough self-respect to leave a cheater, and the other flipflopped on all their big rallying cries within 24hrs. it was immediately noticable when harris was brought back on script...not too mention not having a primary and running a fucking Cheney endorsement at the DNC.
they lost cause they sucked ass and swallow. for the average person, if you have to choose between a corrupt pos smart enough to hide it and someone whose so goddamn proud of their corroption they brag about it...the latter is a known factor and therefor easier to work around.
@IronBird nonetheless. Still Better in every way than the Orange #pedophile
Hilary lost because of the electoral system ,she won the popular vote
She would have won the electoral college if she won more states, which she would have done if she wasn't an establishment Democrat but actually had a popular platform.
If there was no electoral college she would have won. You are proving my point
FDR. There are a few presidents who were progressive for their time but FDR was progressive by today’s standards
Agreed. The misogyny still runs deep in this country, usually expressed as, "She's just not a good candidate!"
The bar is on the floor, for boys. We already know what kinds of men can and have been good enough to get elected. It takes Penis to spell President, apparently, and it doesn't matter that it's out of order.
You used to say a muslim senator will never win. You used to say a black person will never win. It is pure ba to hide failures
I never said those things. I did say, "Well damn, my party would rather run a black man than a woman," and twice I've said, "Well damn, our country would rather elect a criminal than a woman."
Make that three times. I was around for Shirley Chisolm's run (but not old enough to vote) and like everyone else I knew a black woman couldn't get nominated in 1972. The Dems ran George McGovern instead, and Richard Nixon won in a landslide.
Like I said, for the boys the bar is on the floor.
There’s a belief that women leaders will lead to wimpy men because they don’t see that men too can be leaders. I want a good blend. We have plenty of people, who can be plenty of role models.
We have spycraft now anyways so we’re building shady role models, cunning rather than machismo seems a thing. Or am I speaking from the James Bond times that have calmed?
Holy fuck that man is incredibly eloquent. Like every word that flows out of his mouth is measured and exact.
Can someone remind me, is he ineligible for the presidency under current rules?
Yes, the exact terminology in the constitution is that the president must be a "natural born citizen". There's debate on the "natural born" part. For example, Ted Cruz was born Canadian, but his mom was from the US, which conferred him US citizenship at birth as well, so he's debatably "natural born". John McCain was born in the Panama canal zone, which was a US territory at the time (and his parents were citizens), but there still was some debate at the time.
Zohran is basically just a regular immigrant who became a citizen, with no way you could claim the "natural born" part.
Obviously they meant someone who isn't born by C-section
What makes it so impressive is that he can do this on the fly. Incredibly quick. Really one of a kind.
I think he's a big part of the blue wave. He showed that people can get stuff done, not be insert racist anything, and get shit done. Abdul really needs to thank him too.
On a completely irrelevant note, I am digging the mustache look. Not that the full beard was also not nice.
Ah he's a handsome bastard in fairness. He could nearly do no wrong fashion-wise.
I for one hope they impeach the president.
And try to end the war in Iran.
There's trickiness ahead and Dems are going to be blamed even more whatever they do, so they might just as well go for the jugular. Well, as far as they can.
They for sure can impeach him. The problem is trying to convict him in the Senate. They don't have the numbers, it takes a 2/3 majority. And I don't think any of the republicans in the Senate have the balls to try to convict Trump. And far too many of them are MAGA assholes themselves.
However there is a plethora of people under Trump that they can go after and easily put under the spotlight. Taking out his foundation will be far more effective at neutralizing him.
After Tuesday, I see Ossoff as the frontrunner for 2028. That race was called less than an hour after polls closed and demonstrated how strong of a candidate he is.
If Ossoff is the centrist pick, then progressives need someone to counter him. Someone young, charismatic, and bold. Progressives can attack him for saying America's commitment to Israel is "ironclad." He walked it back during this election though. He also doesn't support Medicare for All.
Why wouldnt it be AOC?
I'm saying Ossoff would be the centrist frontrunner. AOC is the progressive frontrunner
Oh I see what you mean. Do you think the primary will actually be between a progressive and establishment choice? I can't see the democrats rigging the primary again since its so well known how it happened last time.
Imo, progressives will be much more effective in the legislative branch than the executive. We need a big enough coalition to actually make the laws to be enforced. That's why I'd much prefer AOC replacing Schumer than running for president.
A progressive or a progressive except for palestine?
I hope we're not still pretending Genocide Joe was a progressive.
It just a genocide the crimes of all crimes, not a big deal.
At least 4% of the population are confirmed killed so far, with a more accurate count being hard because so many bodies are buried under the rubble and Israel won't allow digging equipment in. Also, I say "so far" because the Zionazis kill more every day. Then there's the indirect deaths, from disease and hunger and suicide, which can range from 3-15 times higher than the direct casualty count. We have absolutely no idea what the real number is at this point because data collection is impossible.
In addition: 10% have sustained life-altering injuries (severe burns, missing limbs, etc) and 60% of Palestinians have lost family.
No big deal, right?
Oh is not as bad as the holocaust so it is ok? By that metrics all conflicts are ok they are not as bad as the holocust.
Did you miss the "can range from 3-15 times higher than the direct casualty count" part?
Also, the Nazis were in charge for 12 years. This mass killing started only three years ago, but Israel will catch up.
Remember, Israel is blockading food, fuel, and medicine while still bombing and shooting people. This winter is probably going to be extremely bad and see the death toll spike: Israel targeted Gaza's water infrastructure, hospitals, and has destroyed 82 percent of all structures. No construction equipment or material is allowed in, so most people are effectively homeless.
The plan is total elimination of Gaza as a polity, either by displacing or exterminating the population. There's nowhere to displace them to (the Nazis ran into the same problem) so if Israel is not stopped then we will see them exterminate everyone.
And Israelis love it. The main electoral split is between people who support Netanyahu's current plans for genocide, and people who want even more genocide and think Netanyahu has been too soft on the Palestinians.
The population of Gaza Strip Declined by 10.6% in Two Years. https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/en/post-details/?postId=23319
Israel destroyed 85% of the agricultural fields , they are killing aid workers and now many aid organizations have financial trouble. Gaza depends on humanitarian aid now which most are blocked by israel. Israel is so sadistic that they prefer to extends israel suffering before being exterminated
Mamdani's wrong.
A real progressive is never going to come within sniffing distance of the presidency. After Bernie's primaries got rigged the Democrats were sued for running rigged primaries, they admitted it, and it's perfectly legal for them to do so.
That's what all those shiny superdelegates are for.
Further, you saw with the accusations of radical jihadism against AES and Zohran, and the weaponized SA allegation against Platner, and James Carville's public admission that they'd rather Republicans win than Socialists, that the Democratic Party has no intention of ever running a real progressive for president.
Stop huffing 10 year old copium and engage with reality. Progressive politics are on the ascendancy, and people are ABSOLUTELY FUCKING SICK of Radical Centrism™️. Schumer and Jeffries need to go, for sure, but this is the best time to launch a Progressive in years.
*was
And actually, it was the best time in decades. But we've seen how this ends. Obama made extravagant progressive promises, had a supermajority, and all he did with it was advance fascism, expand the wars he'd promised to end, and make health care more expensive.
Until I see them actually vote otherwise, I have to assume Democrats have every intention of wasting the next two years and making themselves wealthier, and in 2028, handing things back off to Republicans.
Hoping I'm wrong, but we'll see.
and looking for any place of communality. And when it comes to the two of us, that communality has been the welfare of our city. We’ve had conversations that allowed us to free New Yorkers from ICE detentions, to ensure that we were able to get visas for the mother of a New Yorker who was killed here recently. These are the kinds of tangible benefits that can be delivered when we’re looking for any of those areas of overlap. +05:24
Kinda contradictory +00:20 in, about our needs being unrealistic. Nazis do have a lot of communality with Democratic partisanship. What was the name of that praxis again?
all 65 comments