Obviously they meant someone who isn't born by C-section

Taking a nap often gives me a headache

It's still much less transparent with more possibilities of things going wrong and it doesn't guarantee a vote was done anonymous.

Mandatory voting is the much simpler solution

The problem is that the in the US the right wing has claimed there was fraud with mail in voting. This means that if anyone mentions the issues with mail in voting they are assumed of doing the same thing.

No matter whether you are left or right, mail in (or god forbid online voting) is an horribly bad idea. The whole voting process should be transparent and visible from casting your vote (or someone elses) to seeing it counted. That is not possible with mail in voting so it allows for possible fraud (or even the suggestion of fraud as we see in the US).

Someone mentioned unique barcodes on ballots, great now you have eliminated voting anonymity.

Yes, voter suppression is a real issue mail in voting can help against, but IMO mandatory voting is the better solution.

My washing machine doesn't participates in segregation

You mean because of e=mc²? That's true but basically unmeasurable. Air batteries do get mesurable heavier.

I can go months without AI just fine. Yes it does hallucinate, yes it can create slop, but that doesn't mean it's completely useless.

I genuinely didn't get where you were trying to go with that question.

Honestly, I have very mixed feelings about LLMs. I don't think you're necessarily wrong, but I don't think refusing to use AI is going to help me or anyone else.

What do you mean by that?

Just chatting with an LLM uses so few tokens I don't really see that changing

The AI bubble might pop, but just as the dotcom bubble didn't mean the end of the internet it won't mean the end of AI. LLMs (or whatever might supersede them) are here to stay.

And the chili's