I can accept blatant copyright infringement, but blatant copyright infringement? That's where we draw the line, pal

Claude please build me this completely original game with a blue hedgehog that collects rings.

So use another model?

For those wondering, this is not the win/lose you think it means.

This is just one company showing they have the lobbying power to enforce their digressive victimhood on users.

Copyright for you, not us

You can steal content to train your models. But nobody else can utilize them in a manner which steals content.

These types of decisions should bankrupt companies IMO.

Oh look, they can respect copyright

At the end of the day, the guys in charge - the guys who built the system to serve their interests - are still in charge, and keep a kill switch in their back pocket.

How good are those clones?

I wonder if the Chinese models will give a damn about US copyright laws?

Remember if it lives on "the cloud" (someone else's computer) then they control it... not you.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html