Currently there’s just 65 votes separating them; that’s nuts
post
This is a crazy standard process. Miscounts happen, small variances are expected, and most elections aren't so close. That's why so many states have recounts at like .5 -1% mandatory just to verify. They're going to request a recount for such a close race anyway, might as well just make it the standard.
Yet again Mississippi proving they don't know how to operate an effective government.
just to be clear they have specific rules in state law that allow challenging the election in court if they want to.
Seems like that “no recounts” rule is probably gonna be challenged up to the Supreme Court (of the US, not MS), regardless of who technically wins the election
States get to run their own elections?
How? States manage their elections, not the Fed?
The same way any case gets to them. The loser sues and the civil case gets appealed repeatedly.
I guess anything can get to the supreme court that way. The supreme court has been rejecting all election cases though
Bush v Gore was a notable and shameful exception. They are ignoring Trump’s recent temper tantrum filings because he’s asking for way too much for even the crazy corrupt Alito and Thomas to abide. But don't kid yourself, they will forsake what few principles they have in a heartbeat if it suits them.
Look into what happened in the 2000 election around Florida, and how the SC got involved
Didn't that happen once already and it was decided that there wasn't enough time in the 2 months between the election and the candidate taking power without leaving the citizenry in uncertainty over who was elected?
What's the story with Alaska being so late? Similar drama?
Adding to the others: it's also ranked choice, so they have to wait for all the ballots to come in before they start redistributing losing votes
Lots of mail in ballots plus a close election. Usually by the time you get to this point the election is decided before they even have to count the letter ballots.
Their polls closed the later than the rest (except HI), its a massive state, and the infrastructure isn't the best. So it takes time. Also its a close race, so they want to be right when they call it.
Since both the senator and governor are under the majority, it goes to the special ranked choice vote. I'm not sure the process, but I imagine it takes time.
It is a very close race, and logistically difficult to collect and get all the votes counted considering how large and rugged much of the state is.
You also can’t make a citizen lead constitutional amendment vote in Mississippi anymore.
When I lived there, MS when from 5 districts to 4 districts in 2000. The state constitution says to get equal signatures from all 5 districts (12% total of the total vote in the last gubernatorial election). Voter ID and gay marriage restrictions were among the ones that passed.
Then come an amendment in 2020 to legalize medical marijuana for anything a doctor says is allowed. This passed with 70% of the popular vote. They also got signatures of 25% in all the new districts and 20% in the old districts (with much room for error). This was challeneged by the richest county mayor in MS, and the state Supreme Court sided with the mayor saying that “oh yea, you can’t get this because we no longer have 5 districts” rather than going with the heart of the law.
Did they immediately repeal the voter ID one? Hell no. They even said they’d pass one legislatively if it was challenged. It’s been 6 years. Do you think they have gotten a new constitutional amendment process on the books? Hell no! MS government hates its citizens with a passion, mostly because it’s 30% African American.
I’m so glad I left in 2022.
Hell, we're shocked they allow voting in some of these states.
The federal government used to have to send in armed guards to ensure EVERYONE got to vote. Not just Cletus Vanderbilt the 13th.
I'm glad you reassured me of things I don't care about
all 62 comments