Yeah cause that worked very well in the US in 2024.

In countries with a true democracy, ranked choice voting, true multiple parties, sure. In the US and similar countries, absolutely not.

Best analogy I heard about this is that you in a bus with 10 people voting for a driver. 5 people the driver that wanst to drive off a cliff. 3 people vote for the driver that wants to go to MacDonald's. The other two don't vote because MacDonald's is unhealthy so bothe sides are equally bad.

I'm french… she did not convinced me at all.

1. You try to reduce the harm as much as you possibly can on the easiest way possible.
2. Now that you have a, admittedly not great, gov that may hear a bit of what you said you can voice your disappointment to them.
3. Voting for (or against) someone does not prevent you to organize and voice your discontent!
4. So after the harm reduction go and try to steer the political debate where you want it to.

And yeah your bipartisan system in the USA is fucked up. I don't love our system here either.

Note: YOU are the one to choose which is the one who would cause the less harm. Or be the more willing to listen to you when confronting them.

Indeed, the conservatives are usually worse the the liberals.

Oh wait, this is about the US again where everything is backwards.

you have to ignore healium lady