We should have a global Land Value Tax on the top 1%.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Wouldn't the middle class be the 49% in between?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Yeah; that was my thought too. I don’t disagree that the middle class in trouble; but this post doesn’t address 49% of the population

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    In the UK the middle class also largely seem to not want to help the working class. I have seen them complain about things which help the working class as it brings them closer to the middle class and they don't like it. Things like a livable minimum wage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    you're trying to contrive a way this could be okay. an angle you could look from where you won't are how terrifying and atrocious this is.

    I'll sell you the drugs that can make it possible, but fair warning: that blue pill is mostly ketamine. you're gonna need daipers after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    Im not contriving a way for this to be okay, Im pointing out the massive gap in excluding almost half the problem to try and make a point.

    There is quite clearly a problem, but trying to say that theres no "middle class" (a concept meant to mollify a large swath of people) by implying a group who owns 65% of wealth doesnt matter is terrible logic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • fuck tax. if we don't kill them they will kill us.

    I used to work with unhoused populations. those people are you, and they do not have a long life expectancy. do you choose risk of death in revolution, or its certainty?

  • source
  • Serves me right. It is from finance.yahoo.com.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I have up-voted the article, but now I think that the photo is AI. Somebody please tell me I didn't just up-vote AI. I will not support any AI image knowingly, Gaia bless my fleeting incarnation of self-awareness.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago*
    • Not AI. It's a stock photo (credited in the caption), which often look like AI because they're inherently pretty staged and lifeless and make up a lot of generative AI's training material.
    • Setting aside the fact there's no evidence of AI in this image in a vacuum, here's the album, where you can see consistency between shots. And the image is credited to early 2016.
    • While Yahoo! Finance has original articles (and I don't know what you have against them, being so vague about it), this isn't one of them. This is an article from the newsletter of Benzinga, an investment platform. By and large, Yahoo! News and Yahoo! Finance are news aggregators with a minority of their content being first-party.
    • You can edit your comments and don't have to fork your amendment(s)/addendum(s) into a second comment.
  • source
  • parent
  • 4 comments in c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Don't just stop at land, all wealth.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Once you hit 1 billion, everything above should be taxed at 100%, period.

    You can get a nice plaque "won capitalism", and the rest of the wealth gets redistributed to the bottom 10-20%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    The middle class was a myth used to stop Communism.

  • source