From the technological Olympus of Silicon Valley to the urban canyons of Wall Street, a narrow club of vastly wealthy plutocrats sits on a ballooning share of the nation’s resources. One percent of Americans at the apex of the economy are hoarding over 31% of the nation’s total wealth, a cool $55tn in net worth.

Getting them to share with the rest of society, to fund redistribution or pay for public goods, is proving pretty much impossible. Their ability to move resources around, hide profit across jurisdictions, and minimize income to hoard wealth until they die appears to put them beyond the reach of taxation.

One recent research paper found that the country’s richest 384 oligarchs paid only 24% of their economic income in 2025, compared with 30% for the average taxpayer. And not all of them are getting top notch tax advice. Reporting by ProPublica revealed that some of the richest Americans – like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett and Michael Bloomberg – live largely tax free.

top 67 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 45 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Here's how it works: They pay no taxes because they own the government. So we pay taxes and give them our money.

Then they take our money and and use it to fund their terrible ideas that usually just fucking crash and burn and tank the entire fucking economy. So then they need more money. So you continue to pay more money, and they take your money. Now they have more money.

But we can't ask them to contribute money to fund public services let alone their own harebrained schemes because "Something something... Milton Friedman... Blah, blah, blah Hayek and the road to Serfdom, and the CIA is busy defending our freedom, yada, yada, yada."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    To be fair, it's not only the economy anymore. They're literally ready to burn the planet and kill us all to get more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    How the fuck are they gonna get more money if they kill us all?

    Unless it's just gonna be circular financing from now on, with the rich snowballing their monopoly money back and forth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Their net worths are already made up anyway. It's all merely speculative. Once we're all gone, who's going to be left to remind them that those numbers don't mean anything?

    It'll be the same circular lending schemes, only instead of self-fellating about becoming trillionaires, they'll be self-fellating about becoming quadrillionaires. And so on...

    They're like children playing imagination, arguing over whose stick is really "the most powerful sword in the game." The adults have left the room.

    Affluence is a mental illness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Just a reminder that Hayek and his mob were opposed to the application of the scientific method to economics, and also that the only place any of them had any experience of actual governance was in the proto-fascist pre-Anschluss government of Austria, where their proposed policies failed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The survival of American democracy depends on taxing imprisoning billionaires

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 2 weeks ago

    As of early October, 260 billionaires lived in the state, according to the Forbes billionaires’ list, amassing nearly $2.5tn in wealth. Based on these numbers, the 5% tax would raise some $110bn

    If a one time 5% tax on 260 people would raise $110,000,000,000 that alone should be enough to show you how fucked up our system is.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I would even go a step further than “get them to pay their own fair share.”

    When we talk about taxing billionaires, as we are in California right now, they always say the same thing: we will just leave.

    Well, maybe that’s a good thing. Billionaires flock to the US because they know they can do business with a free hand here and keep all the profits. And we see the results: capture of the state, exploitation of the workers, pollution of the media.

    Maybe it would be good for the US if it were no longer seen as the billionaires business paradise and they fucked off somewhwre else to try their luck?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Good riddance. I can't think of the last time a billionaire did any good besides build a new worthless toy or find a way to exploit consumers and the government.

    Not like we'll collapse anyway. Most of their money is spent on overseas labor and goods because they want to hoard all they can.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Not just taxing them, but taxing them until they are no longer billionaires. No one person needs that much money and it is morally wrong to hoard that much money while others are without homes, starving, or worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I'm accused regularly of being a crazy person, but my personal opinion is that after $500M/year, 100% tax rate. Locked. No exceptions, no loopholes, no offshore, no technicalities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I don’t think you’re crazy. Not even extreme. You’re like slightly left of a reasonable centrist in my book. The past 10 years of politics have too many people across the political spectrum wearing orange-shaded glasses, IYKWIM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    orange-shaded glasses

    I was with you until orange-shaded glasses, so I guess Idk. /shrug

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    I made this website to be able to find wealth tax supporters, it also has a parliamentary seats view, directory and other stuff. Linking to the US but I've added 25 countries so far: https://wealthtaxsupporters.com/us

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Well it's not going to happen. Here in California, we are about to reject a billionaire tax, and vote for what will essentially mean privatization and the end of many social services.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Here in Massachusetts our “millionaire tax” has been well received and widely supported. Probably helps that the extra income is partly targeted toward stuff that directly helps people: school lunches, free tuition, transit…… but here on Lemmy I see people bitching about our governor “taxing everyone for everything”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    The survival of American democracy depends on taxing billionaires

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Conservatives will give their own lives to prevent a billionaire from having to pay a penny in taxes. They are the foot-soldiers of the wealth class. Always have been. Conservatives will gleefully kill us all to please their billionaire idols.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Democracy is incompatible with capitalism. If you do not revise the capitalism part, it will naturally progress to fascism again no matter what else you do.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    The survival of humanity depends on us removing billionaires from the picture entirely and not having capitalism.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    We need to squeeze the billionaires until the pips squeak.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Survival? It’s been dead for decades

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Tax or take, it’s their choice

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Scientific socialism is the only sustainable way forward.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    The survival of the WORLD. These Sociopathic Oligarchs are reaching Trillionaire status, and once one gets there, they're ALL going to want it. And once they do, they will be able to build armies, especially if they form alliances. Then they can form their own sovereign nation, and start pushing the world around.

    Why do you think Kushner and Ivanka are pushing that Albanian island as a resort for the super-rich? It just happens to contain miles of fortified bunker that were designed to withstand a NATO attack. It also sits at the opening of a strait that controls much of the shipping to and from Eastern Europe. It would be the perfect stronghold for the Sociopathic Oligarchs to hide from the world, with a strait they can leverage for power.

    They are planning on creating their own country, and taking over the world. Taxing them is a start, but it won't be enough. They are mentally ill, with OCD manifesting as a Financial Hoarding Disorder. They can't stop, and they will even kill millions of people to accumulate even more money that they don't need. They must be stopped, their hoards confiscated, and they must be punished for their crimes, on a global basis.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Unpopular opinion, but I view the people up top squeezing the life out of everyone else to be a big cause for why NVE groups keep popping up. They know they can't stop the billionaires, so they instead hurt the vulnerable, causing all sorts of mayhem until they get arrested.

    Society is basically done if NVE ever becomes mainstream/hits critical mass. Even MAGA wants these people eradicated, but I don't see that happening unless people have reason to trust in society.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Nihilistic Violent Extremism. Very bad people doing very bad things, like blackmailing children into murdering their pets and parents. There are documentaries on Youtube about these groups ("The Com" or "764" for example), but it's some very depressing and nasty stuff. Be prepared if you decide to look into this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Huh. Hadn't heard that initialism until now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I only learned of it myself a month or so ago, from people speculating about why a kid tried to gas his school with cyanide. Turns out the FBI found references to 764 on the kid's phone. I never heard of that before, so I looked it up, and found all sorts of nasty things that group did.

    AFAIK, Kash Patel coined the term. It's surprising, but there's actually a case of Trump's FBI doing what they should be doing and putting bad people away. Everyone wants these guys gone, so I figure Trump views it as no stakes publicity for actually doing something good.

    Not sure why there aren't more awareness campaigns about these groups. They are dangerous people parents would want at least some understanding about. Maybe it's to suppress copycats?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    If you wanna look into the worst of the worst of NVEs, check out the Order of Nine Angles. I ran into them a while ago because I used to lurk 4chan and hang out in Satanist communities, so I saw their recruiting / propaganda. The scary thing about the O9A is that they create radicalization pipelines and communication spaces for the far right - like, they created the Iron March forum that all the neo-nazis used to organize on, they're behind 764, and behind a lot of other real-world attacks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago*

    What's the point when the pentagon can't even pass an audit?

    It's a black hole, sucking in every dollar with insatiable greed, straight into the deep pockets of military contractors. They'll just buy more robots like there's no tomorrow at millions a pop. Every dollar will be killer robots....

    I'm all for taxes, but with our government in this state, I don't think an increased billionaire tax, or any tax, will solve any of our problems, not even one.

    If a company can't pass an audit, it's dismantled, with legal consequences.

    I don't think any amount of increased tax income can save the USA at this point when we don't even know where the money is going. It's like giving money to a drug addict, except the drug is terminators.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    The US has never been democratic for the working classes, and certainly not for indigenous peoples. Even if the US taxes billionaires, it will still not be able to stop the inherent crisis of profitability that is to come.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Some guy making $15k/year "But how will they(the billionaires) afford thier basic needs?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I agree it needs to happen, but how do we prevent them from parking all their money in offshore accounts?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    America has democracy?...

    Since when?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is like a fucking joke at this point, how long have people been saying this, yet nothing actually changes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    We need to start measuring the costs of huge projects in specific billionaires by their net worth.

    "Yes it's a shame that bridge can't be rebuilt. It would cost .05 zuckerbergs. We just don't have that kind of money."

    "The national debt is now surging past 41.1 Elon Musks."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    The survival of any democracy depends on all within. The billionaires separate themselves by lobbying and using laws to protect their filthy lucre while still wanting to live (i.e. "do business") in a democracy.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's an unfair economic model but doesn't have anything to do with democracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    Wrongthink to base it on jealousy emotions. Core solution is eliminating tax breaks for investment income instead of targeting wealth, and to redistribute power through UBI (enough), and ideally liquid democracy.

    https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

    Nazi democracy's problems are Oligarchy/Zionism having disproportionate influence because winners control budgets, and gift everything to their sponsors, at expense of people. Picking a losing fight with no significant consequence even if implemented is just manipulating public's emotions instead of structurally fixing corruption.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Hard disagree. Failure to appropriately tax wealth while taxing income alone is the fundamental cause of labour having no value in the modern economic system. Ownership, not work, generates profit, ergo work has no market value, only wealth. There is no jealousy. Only a monster wants to be a billionaire while their neighbours starve. Taxing investment income is a fools errand because there are a million ways for them to enrich themselves off their holdings without appearing to HAVE income, on paper.

    Taxing wealth may be hard, but so was taxing income when we first tried it. We got better at tracking it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Failure to appropriately tax wealth while taxing income alone is the fundamental cause of labour having no value in the modern economic system

    Linked proposal would have 0 employment income taxes up to $100k, and 0 payroll taxes. 5% increment surtaxes on sliding scale incomes above $100k. Investment income would have base 25% tax. Taxing the income that is derived from wealth (investments) at equal rate to employment income (the 0 income tax is a gimmick based on not deducting employment expenses from employer) is both the right fairness balance, and high revenue raiser. The far greater benefit to 90% of population, overlapping the employee class, is freedom dividends. Over $36k/year in US per adult can be afforded when we stop thinking of just wealth taxes to fund a larger nazi empire by the oligarchs for the oligarchs.

    Taxing investment income is a fools errand because there are a million ways for them to enrich themselves off their holdings without appearing to HAVE income, on paper.

    The one big way is borrowing against investments. A $1m-$5m limit would go a long way to eliminating the loophole for ultra rich. Trusts can be taxed more. The loopholes can be fixed.

    The race to the bottom in US, is based on piecemeal "populist emotional" local measures, that just as Corporate investments shop arround for biggest local tax breaks, threats of leaving when "fair tax local" proposals/policy pass is a weak attempt at not fixing anything.

    Instead of taxing wealth as a principle, I do support financially zeroing out those who sponsor speech of nazi economic fraud, and zionazi theft of American prosperity. But, essentially, everyone is/should be encouraged to get as rich as they want as long as they STFU and pay their taxes instead of corrupting government to make them richer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Ineffective, half measure that achieves nothing by itself. Rearranging deck chairs on the titanic doesn't fix the problem that the existence of billionaires is itself an abomination of a broken economic system. Some inequality is inevitable. Inequality that extreme is evidence of dysfunction. The emotional appeal is simply a tool to build public support for a naturally healthy check on systemic abuse. I'm not taking your bait of deriding emotion. People should be passionate about economic justice. Right wing fear mongers wield emotion like a cudgel while whining like children about the left being bleeding hearts. Enough. You are claiming to be "Rational" while ignoring that a tax on wealth is the only way to re-balance a system so far from free market it makes the excesses of feudal mercantilism look nearly egalitarian. If you believe hard work should count for something, wealth concentration needs limits or you believe that human effort and skill don't have value. Ironically, your investment income tax could be the most effective tool to deter capital flight if used right, but without a wealth tax, its just bread and circuses while human dignity is further degraded by the degenerate rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    the existence of billionaires is itself an abomination of a broken economic system.

    the broken system is direct evil corrupting social governance. Money=speech means money= fraud, theft, terrorism, genocide. But it is the latter application of money that is evil rather than money. It is cause for liberating the evil from their money. Your view is simply dead wrong.

    The only path to wealth is accumulated propensity to savings. Extremely large yacht and epstein island orgy budgets, and MC hammer entourage hookers and blow, is wealth avoidance path. These lifestyle choices are the only path to trickle down, but you might hate them too, perhaps for the one trick "billionaire haters" hate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I like how I'm the one demanding systemic reform, you're advocating petty vengeance but I'm the one reacting emotionally. It is the imbalance of power and influence that money represents that is the fundamental threat. A system where one man can apply more economic pressure than a third of the country is inevitably going to corrupt, it's not a question of who, it's a question of how long it takes.

    And yes, their indulgent excesses are in fact a net harm for humanity. It is the definition of gluttony, and it deserves to be shamed and derided. I'm not jealous, I wouldn't live like that if I could, those people have abandoned their own humanity. They are animals without conscience, without ethical restraint, and without even cognitive empathy. A system that condones and tolerates that kind of behaviour is contemptible and either needs to be corrected or eliminated. They're a festering wound on humanity and they need to be amputated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    you’re advocating petty vengeance

    punishing specific evil is less petty vengence than generalizing on savings accumulation choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    You can play whatever semantic games help you sleep at night, but that does not change that the black hole grade market distortion created by that kind of wealth accumulation artificially inflates asset prices and creates and unjustifiable socioeconomic stratification that cannot help but corrupt a democratic society. Rule of law cannot withstand the Epstein class. Sic semper tyrannis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    eliminating tax breaks for investment income instead of targeting wealth

    Eliminating various tax breaks for “non-income” income is certainly a good start, but when there are people able to live on their wealth rather than income, it’s not enough.

    Plus you’re forgetting a progressive tax rate. Why are we ok with different tax rates depending on income for most of us, but with the top rate at upper-middle income. You’re basically targeting doctors and lawyers as “the wealthiest”, when they also earn next to nothing compared with actual wealthy, and they work for their income. Im not saying they shouldnt have a higher rate, i’m saying we clearly need tax brackets above that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    but with the top rate at upper-middle income. You’re basically targeting doctors and lawyers as “the wealthiest”, when they also earn next to nothing compared with actual wealthy

    Progressive taxation stays, its just added to investment income (capital gains deduction no more) as well. It's enough because its $3T additional revenue before carbon taxes. Billionaires "only" own $8T or so, and a wealth tax that applies just for them would need to be 35% of wealth every single year to raise the same amount. The $16m~ wealth level (top 1%) would need a 5% wealth tax every year to raise the same amount.

    The far more important social governance objective, is distributing social revenue to people as dividends is far more helpful than raising more revenue to pay oligarchs more for more wars. The goal shouldn't be to generate anger at a group just because they saved wealth, it should be to maximize shared prosperity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 2 weeks ago

    Tell me again how you’re gonna tax capital gains that have not been realized on ownership of stocks?

    Millionaires and billionaires borrow money against the value of their stock portfolio or assets. They don’t pay tax on loans because it’s not income. Just like they don’t pay taxes on stocks that own but have not sold.

    The argument for taxing billionaires and millionaires doesn’t hold much water. If all their money/assets are held in a trust and they pay themselves a salary of $50,000 a year they’re only paying taxes on the salary.

  • source
  • [+] -8 points 2 weeks ago

    You a stupid hoe

  • source