all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

logical next step. sounds like they just wanted to wait until the controversy blew over.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm not keeping up with YouTube, but didn't they already remove it a few years ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    We should quit watching YouTube. YouTubers are more proof of overconsumption. People should not be willingly shilling for corps for ad revenue. Just turn it off.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'd say Youtube is a case of lack of competition making an oligopoly. And sadly for quite a few matters, it's still the "least worse" option.

    Still, I'd urge to people, though I know it's an uphill battle, to at least keep alternatives at hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    I mean, not like people would go anywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is probably bad for the YouTubers actually making content, despite it all. They can see whether people disliked their video.

    "Return YouTube dislikes" exists right now to approximate dislikes, and it will continue to exist, and review bombers are more likely to use it and therefore disproportionately influence approximate statistics. But at least for now, YouTubers can dispute those guesses. They won't be able to do that if they lose the metric.

    It's kind of conceding to the mob.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Agreed.

    Some also argue dislikes are used for censoring, but I'd conter-argue that dissidence is a form of opinion. If people are using the tool illegitimately, it doesn't make the tool itself illegitimate. Rather, investigating suspicious behaviour, of which there are tools one can use on Youtube, should be the way.

    And I'd further say the removal hurts not just the content creators, but their followers too. If the creator uses likes ratio as a quality assurance metric, or to know what they should or shouldn't focus on, the lack of the metric will make the service he/she provides worsen, and by extension the experience of their followers.

  • source
  • parent
  • 10 comments in c/enshittification@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    The real dislike button is removing videos from your watch history - as the watch history defines what the algorithm recommends. Curate your watch history and you can have a better experience.

    The dislike button is for users telling the content creator they've made a bad video. But I believe studies have shown it can leave a bad impression of the platform on the user - that's why sites get rid of negative indicators.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    My watch history is turned off.

    The real dislike button is using a channel blocker, or pipepipe etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

    The real dislike button is not watching YouTube.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    pipepipe etc seems very not likey.

    I'm still to find a platform that serves the same purpose as yt, it's my last google thing. I had some potential options open, but then didn't. Need to look yet again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Unsure what aspect you are looking for, but maybe #Grayjay or straight-up #RSS?

    Former aggregates video and audio services, and people can make their own integrations too, and even helps with discoverability if you explore the home tab. Latter fits a similar aggregation purpose purpose, though not quite on discoverability and is more manual to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    A balance of quantity and quality I guess, browser based, and no to low ai

    I've looked a few times over the years and never found anything that ticks the boxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Didnt they remove it years ago?

    I wouldnt know since i use invidious and automatically download videos of creators i follow using a yt-dlp script.

  • source