all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (5 children)

in my experience, it's still a bit unstable for everyday use, but there are more convenient alternatives like Logseq or siyuan.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    i've really been wanting to replace obsidian. i tried logseq for some time but i wasn't very satisfied. i've heard aboyt siyuan but never installed it. do you have any thoughts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I never understood why logseq uses lists for everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    So from what I have understood, it is entirely AI generated? Or was the prototype AI generated and then a human continued the way?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is at the end of the README:

    opensidian was built predominantly with AI models. Nearly all of the code, the design docs, and this README were written by Claude (Anthropic's models, via Claude Code) working from prompts, reviews, and corrections by a single human maintainer. The human decided what to build and what the trust model must guarantee, read and pushed back on the output, and ran it; the models wrote most of the lines. Commit messages record the design rationale in the same way — many were drafted by the model and edited by the maintainer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'll do you one better.

    Emacs Org mode, Logseq, Vi + .MD files + grep.

    I'm partial to that last one. Un-ironically I would use the closed source Obsidian before this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    @gary_host_laptop I Use NextCloud Notes/QOwnNotes, But Is It Worth Switching To Opensidian?

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/opensource@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    They claim GPL 3 license but the whole thing was written by a chat bot, so can they even pretend they own it instead Anthropic? I'd be interested to see how that would play out if challenged.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    have been waiting for something like this. Does it support plug-ins or accept contributions?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Something wrong with logseq?

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ok, so slopscore is basically worthless (because the author decided to just put that paragraph in instead of doing what your supposed to do and have the slop machine as a co-author or whatever it is?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I don't know why it's worthless but it clearly did not catch the fact that the author says it's made almost exclusively using AI. Seems kind of worthless if it didn't register any AI when the author hasn't even tried to hide it and even states it in public

  • source
  • parent