They claim GPL 3 license but the whole thing was written by a chat bot, so can they even pretend they own it instead Anthropic? I'd be interested to see how that would play out if challenged.
post
have been waiting for something like this. Does it support plug-ins or accept contributions?
Something wrong with logseq?
https://slopscore.ava.pet/repo/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub%2Ecom%2Fjpzk%2Fopensidian/main
Seems like it's not slopped?!
in my experience, it's still a bit unstable for everyday use, but there are more convenient alternatives like Logseq or siyuan.
i've really been wanting to replace obsidian. i tried logseq for some time but i wasn't very satisfied. i've heard aboyt siyuan but never installed it. do you have any thoughts?
I never understood why logseq uses lists for everything.
So from what I have understood, it is entirely AI generated? Or was the prototype AI generated and then a human continued the way?
This is at the end of the README:
opensidian was built predominantly with AI models. Nearly all of the code, the design docs, and this README were written by Claude (Anthropic's models, via Claude Code) working from prompts, reviews, and corrections by a single human maintainer. The human decided what to build and what the trust model must guarantee, read and pushed back on the output, and ran it; the models wrote most of the lines. Commit messages record the design rationale in the same way — many were drafted by the model and edited by the maintainer.
Sounds like it was reverse engineered by an LLM
I'll do you one better.
Emacs Org mode, Logseq, Vi + .MD files + grep.
I'm partial to that last one. Un-ironically I would use the closed source Obsidian before this.
@gary_host_laptop I Use NextCloud Notes/QOwnNotes, But Is It Worth Switching To Opensidian?
all 8 comments